2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on [[Official]] Modern Prices Discussion
    Norin the Wary... Aether Revolt has actually made Norin the Wary go up in price. What kind of world have we just found ourselves in? Saffi Eriksdotter too? Why? How?
    Posted in: Modern
  • posted a message on State of Modern Thread: bans, format health, reprints, new cards, and more!
    Quote from rcwraspy »
    Quote from Colt47 »
    The pattern that drives most people nuts is that wizards prints a good card, people play that card and like it, then wizards bans the card and everyone complains they can't play it anymore because their primary venue of play is at FNM where the banlist is basically enforced with an iron fist. Sometimes they make good decisions on bannings where the only people who get upset are the pilots of the decks (GG eldrazi eye of ugin insanity), but most of the time they ban things that are only a problem in one deck, and then kill other fair decks in the collateral. There is something that has long been forgotten it seems at an FNM level: Players need to police themselves. If someone walks into a tournament and they do a 4 round swiss, how long do you think that tournament is going to last if everyone just refuses to play person X because they don't like his deck? What are the judges going to do? Default him to win status and just auto win him? Do people really think that is going to happen?

    It's the complacency at these FNM tournaments that really drives a nail in me. I've put my foot down on some players at my own FNM and it has had results.
    Did you just say that you bullied people into playing what you want them to play and it's worked?


    The situation would require some context. While it's one thing to be a rude to others and be a rules lawyer, it's a bit much when someone is being rude to a new player, is winning, and is also Rules lawyering when they are winning. Even the judge and store owner were with me on that one.
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • posted a message on State of Modern Thread: bans, format health, reprints, new cards, and more!
    Quote from Spsiegel1987 »
    Guess I'm pretty happy I enjoy Jund/Junk. Dat fair magic, bro.

    I'm super paranoid about Affinity, but I'll hope it won't be banned. I have Abzan Company, which is a nice combo and can grind, but it's not broken. Infect could be broken, but I had the deck to prey on things that preyed on Jund/Junk.

    I definitely feel bad for people like Gkou, who keep getting things banned, I'm with him in that I played Twin as a side piece and really fell in love with it, to the point that I was thinking of playing it more than Jund, before it ate a ban. I really enjoyed infect, thats banned.

    Saying, "if it gets banned, oh well, buy another deck" is kind of a horrible answer. Yes, MTG can be expensive, but I don't feel it's right that a 1,000 dollar deck can literally be reduced to nothing

    Now, if players are attracted to absolutely broken ***** like Titan Bloom later in its life, Eldrazi Winter, and you buy into those decks, well, you're an absolute moron. If you have a ton of money and totally accept it'll be banned, or if you're a spike trying to grind out GP's, ok, I understand, play what's best. But if you're trying to buy a deck, just have fun playing, going to FNM's, and maybe some tournaments here and there, I don't think it's unreasonable to invest 1 to 2k in a deck and enjoy it for a long time.

    I'm kind of offended by Jordans, "it's the Jund players complaining". I have not made any outcries for unfair decks or ramp decks eating a ban. Obviously I advocated for Blooms ban, it was broken. Eldrazi was---one of the most powerful decks ever to impact a format in MTG.

    Dredge became a battle of sideboards which warped decks and sideboards--WOTC stated in their reasoning similar to what I wrote in the past. I also wrote that it pushed out other GY strategies, and guess what, the very first small event saw the return of 2 Company decks

    I'd like to think I'm pretty reasonable in what I think is healthy/unhealthy for the format, despite being a GBx player. I never wanted everyone to play fair decks like me, I just don't want broken ass decks that invalidate nearly every other deck or strategy


    Yeah, my last posting was probably myself having a pointless rant session, but it's always painful to see a perfectly fair card get a home in a glass cannon deck or some truly broken abomination of mankind and then have to see it get banned. If modern cheerios takes off, for example, are they just going to ban Puresteel paladin? If they do that they might as well put the nail in the coffin for any equipment strategy.
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • posted a message on State of Modern Thread: bans, format health, reprints, new cards, and more!
    The pattern that drives most people nuts is that wizards prints a good card, people play that card and like it, then wizards bans the card and everyone complains they can't play it anymore because their primary venue of play is at FNM where the banlist is basically enforced with an iron fist. Sometimes they make good decisions on bannings where the only people who get upset are the pilots of the decks (GG eldrazi eye of ugin insanity), but most of the time they ban things that are only a problem in one deck, and then kill other fair decks in the collateral. There is something that has long been forgotten it seems at an FNM level: Players need to police themselves. If someone walks into a tournament and they do a 4 round swiss, how long do you think that tournament is going to last if everyone just refuses to play person X because they don't like his deck? What are the judges going to do? Default him to win status and just auto win him? Do people really think that is going to happen?

    It's the complacency at these FNM tournaments that really drives a nail in me. I've put my foot down on some players at my own FNM and it has had results.
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • posted a message on Wizards of the Coast plan digital reimaging of Magic: The Gathering
    Right now we just have to sort of wait and see what Wizards of the Coast does. I really feel like they are in a World of Warcraft decline era now for the game, where it will eventually level out after some peaks at some set releases and downs. The only hope they have to bring the magic playing population back up to Return to Ravnica levels is to solve the cost of entry issues on the paper side, which they are desperately trying to do and failing at thanks to not reprinting what people actually want over half the time. It took nearly cataclysmic levels of BS to even get them to do an Aetherhub FNM promo. Hopefully whatever digital products they come up with actually do something positive for the game, like reducing singles prices by having online game codes added to each booster pack.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Wizards of the Coast plan digital reimaging of Magic: The Gathering
    Quote from Colt47 »
    FYI, they are doing this due to the generation shift. Magic the gathering has serious issues for the younger generations of gamers such as price of entry. Let alone games like gwent and hearthstone.


    There are always other card games.

    And they have in common that they come and go, magic stays and probably will forever, as it isnt coupled to a brand that will vanish (pokemon and heartstone are bound to other franchises that still exist, and as long as people play WoW Heartstone will be a thing, as long as Pokemon games are released it will also be a trading card game ; but its still hard to judge when that is no longer the case, maybe they will stay, maybe not).

    ----

    I never played Magic Online and probably never will, as i seek the social Friday Night magic atmosphere in my local game store, thats what i value the most, and its a consistent return to a game that existed for almost my entire life and all people that do the same will stick to the game, leave for some time, and still return and even bring their children to the game.


    If they can really capture the game in digital form, it has to be simplified a lot, but in the end, the game is more complex than almost any other TCG that has a digital version, so the step from paper to digital isnt as straight forward as it is for other games.


    The game isn't going to vanish, but it's in decline due to faster, easier to learn and quicker to play games preventing new players from ever stepping into magic. Also, the costs of modern are presenting a problem on a public relations standpoint. Existing players don't have the same confidence in the game that existed a while ago as well. Kind of reminds me of fallen empires days.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Wizards of the Coast plan digital reimaging of Magic: The Gathering
    FYI, they are doing this due to the generation shift. Magic the gathering has serious issues for the younger generations of gamers such as price of entry. Let alone games like gwent and hearthstone.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Quality control issues with KMC Hyper Matte Sleeves?
    Hi Joban,

    I've been doing a massive resleeving and sleeving project where I've been double sleeving using KMC perfect fits and hypermats. So far I'm in about 1200+ sleeves and have had no issues yet. That sounds really strange, though.
    Posted in: Magic General
  • posted a message on U/B Improvise (Not the 0 CMC build)
    Oh yeah, for what it is worth here is Dev's deck from his channel...



    This is basically the 0 cmc build, but given the shell is about improvise one doesn't need to try and rush the game with all 0 and 1 drop artifacts. I think some of the best sources for paying improvise are cards like Servo Schematic, which give effectively two generic mana towards your next play. Also, I don't think vigilence and flying is enough to make Heart of Kiran a good target for Tezzeret's Touch. It's vulnerable to removal at 2 cmc in this format and the best vehicle for the deck is definitely Aethersphere harvester. If you want more mana fixing to ramp into big artifacts, you can combo Tezzeret's Touch with Cultivator's Caravan as well.
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on Modern Masters 2017 March 17
    If they go with tribal for draft, they may go with Zombies and Vampires since they mesh well with Rakdos and Demir colors. I'd also expect Selesnya humans and Azorius Spirits. They have to make the most of the fact they are advertising the new modern masters as giving special focus to RtR and Innistrad, and that is a good way to do it.

    The more I'm thinking on this, though, I really hope the reprints are more from Zendikar. There's just too many sets from the past that need a newer reprinting, and that includes just about all the modern viable lands, swaths of cards from innistrad and back, etc.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Best feeling singles purchase you've made in a while.
    Thought I'd start this one up to see what cards other people bought and ended up loving a lot more than they expected. Recently, I finally put the money down and bought a full set of swords, Batterskull, and a playset of Stoneforge Mystic. The first of the swords arrived two days ago and just holding an actual sword feels amazing. The fact that they have matching artwork thanks to Modern Masters (yes, the Sword of Fire and Ice and Sword of Light and Shadow I bought are the modern masters edition) just makes it feel even better.

    So what was everyone elses special card(s) that they really loved once they arrived?
    Posted in: Magic General
  • posted a message on Walking Ballista
    Quote from kalkris »
    Quote from guntius »
    It's an infinite combo in modern with heartless summoning and mikaeus the unhallowed which is what I've been working with in a combo deck.


    It's funny because you don't even need Heartless Summoning to combo out with Mikaeus, the Unhallowed. Even dying by SBEs he'll come back with a counter (and by that token he's probably better off without Summoning because the Ballista will die with 1 counter still on it if Summoning is on the board), ready for you to remove it and start anew with somebody at 1 less life. It's really just a 2 card combo that without ramp can be done by T56. I mean, additionally Ballista is a force on its own, so...

    Also of note is that I was coming to this thread strictly to address its combo potential with Mike and you happen to be the most recent post XD well done, o ninja.

    ~Lil Kalki

    EDIT: I needs to rtfc XD

    EDIT2: Heartless Summoning or a similar debuff is necessary to combo out with Mike as he himself buffs... I really need to up my game. Thankfully that means, for me, that i don't have to shell out for a second copy at $11 for my Ayli EDH, and can be content with my one incoming $3 copy for U/G Ezuri EDH lmao


    Actually, all you need is a sacrifice outlet and it works fine like Bloodflow Connoisseur. Get mike out, burn the counter on ballista, sacrifice it to Connoisseur, it comes back with a counter, use the counter, etc. Then you can use things like Reckless Fireweaver as well to just combo burn the heck out of someone.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [[Official]] Modern Prices Discussion
    I'm not so sure they aren't reprinting Zen fetches. People have been wanting them for a long time, and Merciless Cut was pretty close in some decks to Fatal Push. That and Fatal Push doesn't really do anything else when revolt triggers besides let you kill something 4 cmc or higher. I don't expect to see Zen fetches in Amonket, though.
    Posted in: Modern
  • posted a message on State of Modern Thread: bans, format health, reprints, new cards, and more!
    The one aspect of bannings that I dislike is when they hit a card that just feels like a really fun piece to play around with. Birthing Pod was probably an inevitable banning, but I can help but feel they also let that card impact the design of Emerge creatures. I think I said in an earlier thread that Emerge would have been a lot better if they had something like...

    Nameless Cultist GB

    "G Tap: Search your library for a creature with an emerge cost and put it into your hand. You may use Cultist to pay the emerge cost. If you do not, sacrifice Cultist."

    0/3

    Likewise, I think the power of searching and getting to play an artifact at the same time is why they are scared of unbanning stoneforge mystic.
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • posted a message on Walking Ballista
    Quote from guntius »
    It's an infinite combo in modern with heartless summoning and mikaeus the unhallowed which is what I've been working with in a combo deck.


    Yeah, the card has a lot of potential in modern. Most of my posts are kind of time sensitive since we just got done with the first tournament of the new standard and this pattern always happens with the top cards. This guy is one to keep an eye on, but his price definitely will come down a bit to probably spell queller levels.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.