Humphreys is a giant ********, this is par the course, shake the tree then act aghast when the nuts find the hollows. I might get suspended for this but I really don't give a ***** anymore, he's been such an ******** for so long that I'm just sick of it.
You're better off on Reddit or some other forum, instead of dealing with Humphreys who makes insane inferences from out of his ass and then goes 'idk why you're so mad' and the mods just buy it.
It was bull***** when someone made up an account to mock him. But *******-a, he can do whatever he wants and mock anyone and it's alright. **** that.
Don't worry though, I'm in the process of deleting my account (you can't just delete it, otherwise I'd be way gone) because id rather spend zero time here than for a second share space with humphreys and the mods who enable his behavior vs actually dealing with it, have fun listening to his BS, like how he thinks because I haven't been cubing much in the last month that I haven't played pauper peasant and therefore don't get to participate. Like if that's the impetus to his insult you can get an idea for the type of ******* moron speaking out of his ass he is.
Humphreys doesn't respect your opinion if for a month you don't cube every time he does, don't forget that. Thats the type of ******** you're arguing with.
Are you serious? I literally told you why I'm upset: you mocked me based on a like on a comment, and then act all confused and use the language barrier as a defense when clearly you have the capacity to understand the language enough to know how to mock people.
It's not caught off guard or embarrassment or whatever bull ***** you're implying. Like I've watched you and others play the games from your cube, I know how the cube plays out to whatever degree that is based on watching the games. It's your involving me in a way that insults me and tries to embarrass me, and I'm not going to sit down and take that because ******* ******** bully like yourself shouldn't get to mock who they want and then play their own 'victim card'.
But keep digging that hole where you continue to insult me and infer I'm passively involved and 'ya got me' or some *****. (Even though I've been calling you out here in this thread for your BS the entire time so clearly have no problem 'sitting in the front' and not in the back, as if that would be bad or embarrassing anyways.)
Like, I defended you when someone else insanely made an account to mock you, and after I was caught off guard there I thought maybe I had you wrong. But nope, you're an ******** and continuing to insult me and make inferences on my character because I liked a couple posts and then called you out on it later.
Here's something to accept: when you intentionally mock someone for liking someone's opinion that goes against yours and that's why you're calling them out, you're an ********. Not sure if you know what the definition of 'mocking' is, but its not exactly warm and friendly and inviting.
You act like Night intentionally provoked you--provoking the bear? Are you serious? He just made a point because he's curious, and then you take it as an attack because of the euphemism he uses! It's insane you can justify it like that.
Hmmmm I wonder why it got personal...can't be the fact that you intentionally mocked me because I liked a comment, right? It's almost like serious ********s intentionally mock people, and you do that all the time! A real piece of ***** you are, that's for sure. Calling someone out because they aren't taking into account 4 years of discussion, do you have any idea how insane that sounds? It makes you come across as a real unreasonable ********. The mental gymnastics being done here to avoid accepting responsibility for being a piece of ***** is truly amazing on a scary level. Honestly, why do you contribute here? So you can ignore everyone else and put them down for not following the Humphreys way? I'm just kidding, I'm not honestly asking because I know any answer you give will be more bull***** mental gymnastics.
[quote from="Humphrey »" url="/forums/the-game/the-cube-forum/pauper-peasant-discussion/193961-the-evaluate-everything-project?comment=914"]Even the T2 can beat you incredible fast (partly because of those 2/1 unblockables lol)
And Salmo, I would appreciate if you play my cube first (since we have the option now), before you further contribute to unfounded assumptions
Remember that convo about not being a dick? This is *exactly* what I was talking about. No one appreciates a condescending ********, and even after our private talk it continues? Pretty BS if you ask me, the language barrier excuse doesn't cut it this time. If you can understand what it takes to give me ***** in english for liking one of the above comments, then you can understand that that's being a ******* ********.
If you really appreciate me telling you how you're being perceived by many members of the community, how about you act like it? What the ****, dude?
</blockquote>
huh? in no way this was meant as an offense. I just noticed your upvote and since mrengineer is just speculating my midrange is not supported, i would have liked that you join a draft. It seems kinda useless to me to theorize and continously explaining gameplay when we can just experience it. I dont understand why you get so upset over it?
</blockquote>
Unfounded assumptions? Honestly dude, stop insulting mine and others' intelligence here. You're a real piece of *****.
[quote from="Humphrey »" url="/forums/the-game/the-cube-forum/pauper-peasant-discussion/193961-the-evaluate-everything-project?comment=914"]Even the T2 can beat you incredible fast (partly because of those 2/1 unblockables lol)
And Salmo, I would appreciate if you play my cube first (since we have the option now), before you further contribute to unfounded assumptions
Remember that convo about not being a dick? This is *exactly* what I was talking about. No one appreciates a condescending ********, and even after our private talk it continues? Pretty BS if you ask me, the language barrier excuse doesn't cut it this time. If you can understand what it takes to give me ***** in english for liking one of the above comments, then you can understand that that's being a ******* ********.
If you really appreciate me telling you how you're being perceived by many members of the community, how about you act like it? What the ****, dude?
Yeah unless I'm in some kind of weird scenario I never search for the value machines. Usually there's a 'need' in every moment and while Jace is great it's more just generically great in a very overpowered way and not filling a specific role, or at least one you want to tutor.
Yeah but constructed =/= pauper singleton. Being able to jam x4 cantrip is a lot different than running 1 ponder/preordain and then running looters too.
Looters being quality has always been an inherent principle in lower powered limited formats, so in fear of running around in circles might be time to agree to disagree
Do you have the game logs, humphreys? You have been drafting a bunch, but I'm curious to see how the looters played out as 'useless' doesn't really align with their power level historically.
Evolving Wild is good because it's colorless and goes in a land slot. This seems really bad for what you're trying to accomplish, square pegs and round holes.
I think the problem is that the theorizing exists and has existed since the card has been around forever, but the card still doesn't see consistent success. In theory vs in practice, essentially.
YMMV, obv, but it's been a *long* time since I've seen a Loam deck do work. We record a lot of 3-0s through xmage but LftL never gets there, part of that is lists but it's hard to ignore the other parts.
Izzet Charm does its fair share of shocking, too. The three modes are relevant in my experience, usually there's something you're happy to do with it even at the cost of inefficiency. I also agree that Izzet is weak overall, but that starts after Charm.
You're better off on Reddit or some other forum, instead of dealing with Humphreys who makes insane inferences from out of his ass and then goes 'idk why you're so mad' and the mods just buy it.
It was bull***** when someone made up an account to mock him. But *******-a, he can do whatever he wants and mock anyone and it's alright. **** that.
Don't worry though, I'm in the process of deleting my account (you can't just delete it, otherwise I'd be way gone) because id rather spend zero time here than for a second share space with humphreys and the mods who enable his behavior vs actually dealing with it, have fun listening to his BS, like how he thinks because I haven't been cubing much in the last month that I haven't played pauper peasant and therefore don't get to participate. Like if that's the impetus to his insult you can get an idea for the type of ******* moron speaking out of his ass he is.
Humphreys doesn't respect your opinion if for a month you don't cube every time he does, don't forget that. Thats the type of ******** you're arguing with.
It's not caught off guard or embarrassment or whatever bull ***** you're implying. Like I've watched you and others play the games from your cube, I know how the cube plays out to whatever degree that is based on watching the games. It's your involving me in a way that insults me and tries to embarrass me, and I'm not going to sit down and take that because ******* ******** bully like yourself shouldn't get to mock who they want and then play their own 'victim card'.
But keep digging that hole where you continue to insult me and infer I'm passively involved and 'ya got me' or some *****. (Even though I've been calling you out here in this thread for your BS the entire time so clearly have no problem 'sitting in the front' and not in the back, as if that would be bad or embarrassing anyways.)
Like, I defended you when someone else insanely made an account to mock you, and after I was caught off guard there I thought maybe I had you wrong. But nope, you're an ******** and continuing to insult me and make inferences on my character because I liked a couple posts and then called you out on it later.
You act like Night intentionally provoked you--provoking the bear? Are you serious? He just made a point because he's curious, and then you take it as an attack because of the euphemism he uses! It's insane you can justify it like that.
>meant to mock you
Hmmmm I wonder why it got personal...can't be the fact that you intentionally mocked me because I liked a comment, right? It's almost like serious ********s intentionally mock people, and you do that all the time! A real piece of ***** you are, that's for sure. Calling someone out because they aren't taking into account 4 years of discussion, do you have any idea how insane that sounds? It makes you come across as a real unreasonable ********. The mental gymnastics being done here to avoid accepting responsibility for being a piece of ***** is truly amazing on a scary level. Honestly, why do you contribute here? So you can ignore everyone else and put them down for not following the Humphreys way? I'm just kidding, I'm not honestly asking because I know any answer you give will be more bull***** mental gymnastics.
Unfounded assumptions? Honestly dude, stop insulting mine and others' intelligence here. You're a real piece of *****.
Remember that convo about not being a dick? This is *exactly* what I was talking about. No one appreciates a condescending ********, and even after our private talk it continues? Pretty BS if you ask me, the language barrier excuse doesn't cut it this time. If you can understand what it takes to give me ***** in english for liking one of the above comments, then you can understand that that's being a ******* ********.
If you really appreciate me telling you how you're being perceived by many members of the community, how about you act like it? What the ****, dude?
Looters being quality has always been an inherent principle in lower powered limited formats, so in fear of running around in circles might be time to agree to disagree
YMMV, obv, but it's been a *long* time since I've seen a Loam deck do work. We record a lot of 3-0s through xmage but LftL never gets there, part of that is lists but it's hard to ignore the other parts.