You can't Fling Precursor for 9. Fling doesn't target.
came here to say just that.
please everyone READ CAREFULLY the text of Precursor Golem. its triggered ability will only copy an "instant or sorcery that targets a single golem"
if it is not an instant or sorcery it will not be copied.
if the spell has more than one target it will not be copied.
if the spell has a target but the target is not a single golem, it will not be copied.
fling's target is an enemy creature or player. the sacrificed creature is not the target of fling. that is part of its additional cost, and costs are never targetted.
Original Targeted - which stacks on the other two -
3x New Precursor Cackling Counterpart token's come into play, one for each existing Golem, when those 3 come into play, each one puts in 2 more golems, for 6 more.
Next person to say Sorin is becoming w/b will be teleported to Jin-Gitaxias' labs with a sign saying 'everything usable except for the brain'.
We have been practically told it won't happen. If (and this is an if so large it alters weather patterns) Sorin adds a color, it will likely be red. And even then, hedonism (which seems to be the main argument for) is still black. Self-indulgence is black.
Original Targeted - which stacks on the other two -
3x New Precursor Cackling Counterpart token's come into play, one for each existing Golem, when those 3 come into play, each one puts in 2 more golems, for 6 more.
so its 3+3+6=12 Golems?
Not quite, the copies of counterpart will make token copies of your tokens, so you will end up making 2 more tokens, and then a precursor with 2 more tokens for a total of 5 new golems. A second counterpart would get quite out of hand however...
Original Targeted - which stacks on the other two -
3x New Precursor Cackling Counterpart token's come into play, one for each existing Golem, when those 3 come into play, each one puts in 2 more golems, for 6 more.
so its 3+3+6=12 Golems?
i believe only precursor golem puts 2 more golems into play. The other 2 are simply golems and put 1 copy of itself into play.
3+3+1+1=8 golems (2 being precursor).
Edit: after looking in the rules section, it gets quite more complicated if there's 2 precursor golems in play and/or parallel lives, lol.
What does this mean? Is it spam? Or is it relevant to the topic? I'm confused as I don't speak whatever language that is.
Ok after a quick google search, I got redirected to another MTGSalvation page which directed me to yet another page, which had the definition and origin,
what exactly of the top answers was the correct one that you got "Nath'd" upon? Because im still not clear.
Next person to say Sorin is becoming w/b will be teleported to Jin-Gitaxias' labs with a sign saying 'everything usable except for the brain'.
We have been practically told it won't happen. If (and this is an if so large it alters weather patterns) Sorin adds a color, it will likely be red. And even then, hedonism (which seems to be the main argument for) is still black. Self-indulgence is black.
What does this mean? Is it spam? Or is it relevant to the topic? I'm confused as I don't speak whatever language that is.
Ok after a quick google search, I got redirected to another MTGSalvation page which directed me to yet another page, which had the definition and origin,
what exactly of the top answers was the correct one that you got "Nath'd" upon?
Because im still not clear.
Which answer it was does not matter, hence him deleting the post.
As to Integra saying that Precursor Golem is 'the nuts,' I entirely disagree. Card seems pretty poor right now and there is not a good controlling ramp build to steal games with the early nine points of damage. Without Lotus Cobra the card is pretty lackluster, in this players opinion. I doubt it will make any worthwhile appearances this season.
If you have a question on the moderation, PM the Mod. Don't post in the thread. Chances are I won't see it or you will get another infraction. I won't this time, this is just a verbal warning. As for the above post, I don't know what else I could add. It's clearly spam as the infraction reads out to you.
Things hurt him that are currently played are: Incinerate, Dismember, Brimstone Volley, Divine Offering, Ancient Grudge, Doomblade, Dispatch, and some Act of Treason type cards.
That's a good list of cards, but I don't think that should scare you off playing him or at least trying him out.
came here to say just that.
please everyone READ CAREFULLY the text of Precursor Golem. its triggered ability will only copy an "instant or sorcery that targets a single golem"
if it is not an instant or sorcery it will not be copied.
if the spell has more than one target it will not be copied.
if the spell has a target but the target is not a single golem, it will not be copied.
fling's target is an enemy creature or player. the sacrificed creature is not the target of fling. that is part of its additional cost, and costs are never targetted.
Is it like this?
1Precusor Original with 2x Golem tokens in play.
Original Targeted - which stacks on the other two -
3x New Precursor Cackling Counterpart token's come into play, one for each existing Golem, when those 3 come into play, each one puts in 2 more golems, for 6 more.
so its 3+3+6=12 Golems?
Seriously though, precursor is the nuts.
Not quite, the copies of counterpart will make token copies of your tokens, so you will end up making 2 more tokens, and then a precursor with 2 more tokens for a total of 5 new golems. A second counterpart would get quite out of hand however...
i believe only precursor golem puts 2 more golems into play. The other 2 are simply golems and put 1 copy of itself into play.
3+3+1+1=8 golems (2 being precursor).
Edit: after looking in the rules section, it gets quite more complicated if there's 2 precursor golems in play and/or parallel lives, lol.
Spam'd
OldSchool on Cockatrice
UW "Nancy" - U/w Tempo UW
BUG Damia Self-Mill Multiplayer BUG
BRW Kaalia 1v1 BRW
What does this mean? Is it spam? Or is it relevant to the topic? I'm confused as I don't speak whatever language that is.
Ok after a quick google search, I got redirected to another MTGSalvation page which directed me to yet another page, which had the definition and origin,
what exactly of the top answers was the correct one that you got "Nath'd" upon? Because im still not clear.
Which answer it was does not matter, hence him deleting the post.
As to Integra saying that Precursor Golem is 'the nuts,' I entirely disagree. Card seems pretty poor right now and there is not a good controlling ramp build to steal games with the early nine points of damage. Without Lotus Cobra the card is pretty lackluster, in this players opinion. I doubt it will make any worthwhile appearances this season.
In the future you should probably offer a suggestion on the correct protocol instead of simply mod-spamming, that's equally unhelpful.
If you have a question on the moderation, PM the Mod. Don't post in the thread. Chances are I won't see it or you will get another infraction. I won't this time, this is just a verbal warning. As for the above post, I don't know what else I could add. It's clearly spam as the infraction reads out to you.
OldSchool on Cockatrice
UW "Nancy" - U/w Tempo UW
BUG Damia Self-Mill Multiplayer BUG
BRW Kaalia 1v1 BRW