So, firstly, I indicate the double-posting could be a bad thing, you comment on it (twice) - and then... do it again?
Quote from Manders »
I'm just having fun. Well, trying to.
Subtle.
Quote from Manders »
Damn right I challenged him on why he wasn't voting for me, just like I did Jobie. Cause it ain't that hard to ****ing look and see how many votes someone has.
Interesting take away from that comment I made. No mention of how your attitude shift was totally transparent and 100% nailed by Seppel in RtA, eh? I didn't think you'd want to go that route.
See, you're completely aware of how you play, and particularly so in the case where you were scum. That's why I'm struggling with this "I made a mistake" and "I'm not afraid" defense.
Quote from Manders »
Hinted at what? What are you talking about?
Hinted at you being a chicken; he asked if you unvoted because of me and Azrael.
And, uh, the mud you just threw at Az isn't sticking yet.
Every single one of these posts is him either RVSing or acting like he's never played a game before. I have no idea what's going on with this, but I stated it was bothering me here:
So, firstly, I indicate the double-posting could be a bad thing, you comment on it (twice) - and then... do it again?
What do I care? I'm getting lynched.
Subtle.
Honest.
Interesting take away from that comment I made. No mention of how your attitude shift was totally transparent and 100% nailed by Seppel in RtA, eh? I didn't think you'd want to go that route.
I don't know what you're talking about. Seppel caught me because I went invisible and he's a stalker.
ohtherony
See, you're completely aware of how you play, and particularly so in the case where you were scum. That's why I'm struggling with this "I made a mistake" and "I'm not afraid" defense.
Yeah, and I always do. Doesn't mean I don't make ****ing mistakes.
Hinted at you being a chicken; he asked if you unvoted because of me and Azrael.
No, he hinted at me with scum with the both of you. Go read it again.
And, uh, the mud you just threw at Az isn't sticking yet.
I'm happy enough to go ahead and toss on the L-1 vote, but first, is there any actual business anyone wants to bring up before the day ends? I'll wait until 10pm EST to actually place my vote.
Wit's End is the PERFECT answer to your opponent's Monomania however.
Just hold on to your Wit's End when they Monomania, so you can Wit's End them on your next turn!!!
I think this is fairly reminiscent of the "Jace Battles" we have seen in past standards.. My guess is we will soon witness the great Monomania-Wit's End battles.
Wit's End is the PERFECT answer to your opponent's Monomania however.
Just hold on to your Wit's End when they Monomania, so you can Wit's End them on your next turn!!!
I think this is fairly reminiscent of the "Jace Battles" we have seen in past standards.. My guess is we will soon witness the great Monomania-Wit's End battles.
Well, there is actually some business I'd like to care for before we go ending the day. Mainly Manders needs to claim; I also need to determine how I want to address something else.
Also, @Manders: No, that's not what I get from that question at all. I get that AE thinks you changed your mind because Az and I swayed you - that you have no conviction. He can clear it up, of course, but insinuating that Az, you, and me are scum together from that seems like a pretty huge leap.
In RtA, Seppel called your responses "stoic" - indicating a tell for you - and then suddenly you started providing answers to his questions that were, well, less stoic and far more emotionally-charged.
No, he hinted at me with scum with the both of you. Go read it again.
Don't assume or put words in my mouth. You were dead serious with your vote. Pressure was building from AZ and DYH and boom, unvote. I then respond that it was hard following you. You acted scared because it appeared they were starting to zero in on you. AZ called Emo town and you did not want to but heads with him so you unvoted.
Bull ****ing ****. You said "Did DYH and Az tell you to unvote?" That ABSOLUTELY read to me as you implying they were my buddies and told me in scum chat that my vote was crap, HENCE MY ****ING RESPONSE TO IT
Manders, did Azrael and DYH talk you out of voting Emo?
This does not have anything to do with scum chat. Only if you took that phrase literally and implied it was done in private. He was very clearly referring to Az's read and my question of your vote reasoning.
Go look in RtA and search for "stoic". You were involved in the conversation with Seppel, I have a real hard time buying you don't remember this.
Ok, whatever.
This does not have anything to do with scum chat. Only if you took that phrase literally and implied it was done in private. He was very clearly referring to Az's read and my question of your vote reasoning.
Bull ****ing ****. You said "Did DYH and Az tell you to unvote?" That ABSOLUTELY read to me as you implying they were my buddies and told me in scum chat that my vote was crap, HENCE MY ****ING RESPONSE TO IT
These posts come after your vote. Your unvote comes after their posts.
I'm not implying they're your buds. I'm implying they scared you off.
Yeah, I got that now. Doesn't mean my initial interpretation is any less true.
One could argue you had that interpretation because you have scum buddies. That's idle speculation, though, right?
Might as well address the other issue while we wait on Seppel. (Although frankly, this comes across as more of a stall tactic rather than waiting on a claim OK - particularly if the scum have daytalk, but whatever.)
So, even if Manders' claim is uninspiring and the consensus is to follow through with her lynch - I'd still like to get a whole lot more posts in today. I've been pretty spammy thus far, but I've got a ways to go yet; it feeds into why I asked the previous group question, though, so they have to be legit posts. It's not the end of the world if I don't, but I think it's in the town's best interest if I end the day as the top poster, at a minimum.
One could argue you had that interpretation because you have scum buddies. That's idle speculation, though, right?
It certainly could be argued as such, yes. It's wrong, though.
My claim:
I'm Cyan, Town Impossible Perma Roleblocker. Once a day, when someone claims, I can put, in bold font, IMPOSSIBLE! in the thread, and that person will be permablocked. It does say that person will be notified via PM that they were targeted whether they lied about their role or not. I have the standard town win condition, but I do not know it.
So, there ya go.
Might as well address the other issue while we wait on Seppel. (Although frankly, this comes across as more of a stall tactic rather than waiting on a claim OK - particularly if the scum have daytalk, but whatever.)
So, even if Manders' claim is uninspiring and the consensus is to follow through with her lynch - I'd still like to get a whole lot more posts in today. I've been pretty spammy thus far, but I've got a ways to go yet; it feeds into why I asked the previous group question, though, so they have to be legit posts. It's not the end of the world if I don't, but I think it's in the town's best interest if I end the day as the top poster, at a minimum.
It certainly could be argued as such, yes. It's wrong, though.
My claim:
I'm Cyan, Town Impossible Perma Roleblocker. Once a day, when someone claims, I can put, in bold font, IMPOSSIBLE! in the thread, and that person will be permablocked. It does say that person will be notified via PM that they were targeted whether they lied about their role or not. I have the standard town win condition, but I do not know it.
So, there ya go.
Have fun with that.
Mkay.
You mean the standard win condition that's in the SAMPLE TOWN PM at the start of the thread?
LMAO - that's because you don't have a town PM, Manders. I know exactly what's in it, thank you very much.
Regardless, the fact you coincidentally claimed the same exact ability as what you had in RtA (as scum) without so much as batting an eyelash about it is comical. Especially considering, ya know, since you can't seem to recall details from that very same game.
LMAO - that's because you don't have a town PM, Manders. I know exactly what's in it, thank you very much.
Regardless, the fact you coincidentally claimed the same exact ability as what you had in RtA (as scum) without so much as batting an eyelash about it is comical. Especially considering, ya know, since you can't seem to recall details from that very same game.
I don't recall being called out for being stoic. OH ****ING WELL.
You can actually do a search in RtA for "permablock" and it returns results. Your burnout was to vanillize a player.
See here:
Quote from Manders Role PM from RtA »
Extinguish (burnout) - Use of this spell will cause the targeted player to permanently lose his ability to cast spells and/or burnouts. (S)he will effectively become vanilla.
Remember? Kind of like, oh I don't know, permanently role blocking them? This didn't strike you the least bit odd when you got your role PM? Like - Hey! I've seen something like this before! No? I'm guessing because you just came up with it from your subconscious. Or you have a really terrible memory - which you claim not to have, so hell if I know.
So, even if Manders' claim is uninspiring and the consensus is to follow through with her lynch - I'd still like to get a whole lot more posts in today. I've been pretty spammy thus far, but I've got a ways to go yet; it feeds into why I asked the previous group question, though, so they have to be legit posts. It's not the end of the world if I don't, but I think it's in the town's best interest if I end the day as the top poster, at a minimum.
Fine, I'll wait, mostly because of what you just mentioned.
If there ARE townies that have the exact WC in their role PM and not what I have in mind, I am personally going to kick Seppel in the shin when I see him in February.
You can actually do a search in RtA for "permablock" and it returns results. Your burnout was to vanillize a player.
See here:
Remember? Kind of like, oh I don't know, permanently role blocking them? This didn't strike you the least bit odd when you got your role PM? Like - Hey! I've seen something like this before! No? I'm guessing because you just came up with it from your subconscious. Or you have a really terrible memory - which you claim not to have, so hell if I know.
Now that I'm not rushing out the door, allow me to elaborate.
Yeah, I was a ONE TIME permablocker in RtA. I remember that very well. I used it on Ged N2.
Here, I am a MULTI-USE permablocker. Which makes it even cooler.
Now, two things I want you to consider. And don't come at me with "RAWR WIFOM", actually consider what I'm about to say:
1) If I actually were scum with this role, why the **** would I claim it? Ever? Did I claim it in RtA? Hmm? No, I absolutely would have lied. I even told Seppel I could never claim this if I got pushed to claim because it wouldn't save ****. But, honesty is the best policy.
2) I got lynched D1 in GHS because I didn't provide the right town WC. You HONESTLY think, if I was scum, that I wouldn't have checked the first post to verify what my WC should be? Guardman can ****ing attest to this **** being true.
That said, Unvote.
Knowing Seppel, I wouldn't put it past him to give some townies the WC and some townies what I got to prevent from being able to clear people based on WC BS. So, I implore you, please just wait until everybody confirms or denies that they have the ACTUAL town WC (I ran out of room on my phone so could someone please post)
If there ARE townies that have the exact WC in their role PM and not what I have in mind, I am personally going to kick Seppel in the shin when I see him in February.
Because that is some ****ing bull****.
Now that I'm not rushing out the door, allow me to elaborate.
Yeah, I was a ONE TIME permablocker in RtA. I remember that very well. I used it on Ged N2.
Here, I am a MULTI-USE permablocker. Which makes it even cooler.
And still ridiculously similar.
Quote from MandersHex »
Now, two things I want you to consider. And don't come at me with "RAWR WIFOM", actually consider what I'm about to say:
1) If I actually were scum with this role, why the **** would I claim it? Ever? Did I claim it in RtA? Hmm? No, I absolutely would have lied. I even told Seppel I could never claim this if I got pushed to claim because it wouldn't save ****. But, honesty is the best policy.
RAWR WIFOM
(also, you had daytalk and two really good partners in RtA.)
Quote from MandersHex »
2) I got lynched D1 in GHS because I didn't provide the right town WC. You HONESTLY think, if I was scum, that I wouldn't have checked the first post to verify what my WC should be? Guardman can ****ing attest to this **** being true.
Good. Remember it the next time I get overzealous and make a stupid mistake.
I didn't forget.
Quote from MandersHex »
That said, Unvote.
Knowing Seppel, I wouldn't put it past him to give some townies the WC and some townies what I got to prevent from being able to clear people based on WC BS.
Riiiiight - so he'd put it - IN THE SAMPLE TOWN PM? Are you serious?
Quote from MandersHex »
So, I implore you, please just wait until everybody confirms or denies that they have the ACTUAL town WC (I ran out of room on my phone so could someone please post)
in their role PM before you lynch me. I waited 2 years for this game and fought HARD to get it to run. I'm literally about to cry, I'm so pissed at myself for ****ing up and getting myself lynched.
And, yes, this is an appeal to emotion. I don't ****ing care. I really want to play this game.
No, I'm trying to not get lynched. I will stop posting for now so DYH can get ahead of me.
Just, please, at LEAST verify if all townies have the actual town WC. Please, cause I know for a fact they do not, and I don't believe I'm the only one.
Just, please, at LEAST verify if all townies have the actual town WC. Please, cause I know for a fact they do not, and I don't believe I'm the only one.
Just, please, at LEAST verify if all townies have the actual town WC. Please, cause I know for a fact they do not, and I don't believe I'm the only one.
I've got no problem with that; even if someone's willing to risk their neck for you (because I think every townie has the standard WC and the only way we'll find a dissenter is if you have a scum buddy with a brass pair), we can then address how anti-town your role is at that point. Or how your behavior doesn't match up with your claim - this is a provable role, yet you were condemning your "I'm lynched" fate earlier. Or any number of various and sundry scummy things you've managed to do in under 50 posts!
Okay, I guess I won't vote for a while. Manders' reaction is not the reaction I'd expect from a scum buddy being bussed, so I'd be pretty surprised if DYH were scum with her. I'm willing to go along with whatever he needs. Any chance you can give us an idea how long that's going to take, DYH? Do you just need to be the highest poster, or is there some threshold we need to try to hit?
Wit's End is the PERFECT answer to your opponent's Monomania however.
Just hold on to your Wit's End when they Monomania, so you can Wit's End them on your next turn!!!
I think this is fairly reminiscent of the "Jace Battles" we have seen in past standards.. My guess is we will soon witness the great Monomania-Wit's End battles.
@all: What if I told you in this game that double-posting is bad. Thoughts?
I would *shrug*
Then I would ask you if double-posting would be bad for me in this game. As in, dangerous in some way. Then, depending on what you said, we might have a conversation.
Now it appears you are just saying you want to be the highest poster. Is that right, or is there something else?
I'm happy enough to go ahead and toss on the L-1 vote, but first, is there any actual business anyone wants to bring up before the day ends? I'll wait until 10pm EST to actually place my vote.
Ugh. I don't really care much for this. Like, Manders has just said she's about to claim, and you are like, ready to vote and end the day whenever you want guys!
It certainly could be argued as such, yes. It's wrong, though.
My claim:
I'm Cyan, Town Impossible Perma Roleblocker. Once a day, when someone claims, I can put, in bold font, IMPOSSIBLE! in the thread, and that person will be permablocked. It does say that person will be notified via PM that they were targeted whether they lied about their role or not. I have the standard town win condition, but I do not know it.
So, there ya go.
Have fun with that.
Mkay.
Are you saying this ability completely shuts down another player? Any ability or abilities they might have? Regardless of whether they are false-claiming or not? So if someone had theoretically "joke" claimed early on you could perma-block them for the rest of the game? You don't mention any kind of timing restrictions on when you do this. Does it have to be immediately? Do you have to "quote" the claim post? Can you wait until the end of the day?
That's my biggest concern with this claim as presented.
No offense, but I have zero interest in just letting you get any particular target number of posts today.
I have no time to go and review people's old games these days, so I'm going to cop out and ask other people here if they know of a game or games where Manders went flying off the handle ****ing every other sentence, and was frustrated Town? Because the few games I remember playing with her she didn't do this. Of course, one time I remember she was Town (Indiana Jones) and one time scum (Joss Whedon), so that doesn't tell me very much.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Bateleur »
Ambush Krotiq makes me laugh so much. I keep rereading the card and it keeps not having Flash. In what sense is this an ambush again? I just have visions of this huge Krotiq poorly concealed in some bushes, feeling slightly sad that his carefully planned ambushes never seem to work.
Wit's End is the PERFECT answer to your opponent's Monomania however.
Just hold on to your Wit's End when they Monomania, so you can Wit's End them on your next turn!!!
I think this is fairly reminiscent of the "Jace Battles" we have seen in past standards.. My guess is we will soon witness the great Monomania-Wit's End battles.
@Manders: Just to be clear, you mean the EXACT, ACTUAL Town WC that's given in the opening post, which is the EXACT, ACTUAL Town WC that you've claimed not to have? Or do you mean the EXACT, ACTUAL Town WC that is apparently not that one, but some other one that only you know? Because mine is the first.
Wit's End is the PERFECT answer to your opponent's Monomania however.
Just hold on to your Wit's End when they Monomania, so you can Wit's End them on your next turn!!!
I think this is fairly reminiscent of the "Jace Battles" we have seen in past standards.. My guess is we will soon witness the great Monomania-Wit's End battles.
Also, my "Win Condition" is the exact one posting in the "sample" role PM, so I have no idea what Manders is talking about there.
Manders: what are you talking about?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Bateleur »
Ambush Krotiq makes me laugh so much. I keep rereading the card and it keeps not having Flash. In what sense is this an ambush again? I just have visions of this huge Krotiq poorly concealed in some bushes, feeling slightly sad that his carefully planned ambushes never seem to work.
@Manders: Just to be clear, you mean the EXACT, ACTUAL Town WC that's given in the opening post, which is the EXACT, ACTUAL Town WC that you've claimed not to have? Or do you mean the EXACT, ACTUAL Town WC that is apparently not that one, but some other one that only you know? Because mine is the first.
Wit's End is the PERFECT answer to your opponent's Monomania however.
Just hold on to your Wit's End when they Monomania, so you can Wit's End them on your next turn!!!
I think this is fairly reminiscent of the "Jace Battles" we have seen in past standards.. My guess is we will soon witness the great Monomania-Wit's End battles.
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
TheFooFish (3): Axelrod, Emo_Pinata, MandersHex
MandersHex (3): TheFooFish, Azrael, DYH
Emo_Pinata (1): Jobie
Axelrod (1): Puddlejumper
Puddlejumper (1): Rianalnn
Guardman (1): AlphaInsidious
Not Voting (2): Archmage Eternal, Guardman
With 12 alive, it is 7 to lynch.
Subtle.
Interesting take away from that comment I made. No mention of how your attitude shift was totally transparent and 100% nailed by Seppel in RtA, eh? I didn't think you'd want to go that route.
See, you're completely aware of how you play, and particularly so in the case where you were scum. That's why I'm struggling with this "I made a mistake" and "I'm not afraid" defense.
Hinted at you being a chicken; he asked if you unvoted because of me and Azrael.
And, uh, the mud you just threw at Az isn't sticking yet.
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
Morning.
What do I care? I'm getting lynched.
Honest.
I don't know what you're talking about. Seppel caught me because I went invisible and he's a stalker.
ohtherony
Yeah, and I always do. Doesn't mean I don't make ****ing mistakes.
No, he hinted at me with scum with the both of you. Go read it again.
Whatever, dude. Just watch him when I flip town.
Sending my claim to Seppel to check atm. brb
Tired of corporate corruption ruining your favorite MtG site?
Come join ours!!
We even have Mafia!!
Also, @Manders: No, that's not what I get from that question at all. I get that AE thinks you changed your mind because Az and I swayed you - that you have no conviction. He can clear it up, of course, but insinuating that Az, you, and me are scum together from that seems like a pretty huge leap.
In RtA, Seppel called your responses "stoic" - indicating a tell for you - and then suddenly you started providing answers to his questions that were, well, less stoic and far more emotionally-charged.
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
Still waiting for Seppel. Hopefully he'll respond before he has to leave for work.
Tired of corporate corruption ruining your favorite MtG site?
Come join ours!!
We even have Mafia!!
Don't assume or put words in my mouth. You were dead serious with your vote. Pressure was building from AZ and DYH and boom, unvote. I then respond that it was hard following you. You acted scared because it appeared they were starting to zero in on you. AZ called Emo town and you did not want to but heads with him so you unvoted.
They hate us cause they ain't us.
All you're doing is rehashing what the others have already said, though.
Tired of corporate corruption ruining your favorite MtG site?
Come join ours!!
We even have Mafia!!
Also,
This does not have anything to do with scum chat. Only if you took that phrase literally and implied it was done in private. He was very clearly referring to Az's read and my question of your vote reasoning.
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
Ok, whatever.
THEN LYNCH ME FOR READING IT WRONG, OK?!?!
Tired of corporate corruption ruining your favorite MtG site?
Come join ours!!
We even have Mafia!!
These posts come after your vote. Your unvote comes after their posts.
I'm not implying they're your buds. I'm implying they scared you off.
They hate us cause they ain't us.
Yeah, I got that now. Doesn't mean my initial interpretation is any less true.
Tired of corporate corruption ruining your favorite MtG site?
Come join ours!!
We even have Mafia!!
One could argue you had that interpretation because you have scum buddies. That's idle speculation, though, right?
Might as well address the other issue while we wait on Seppel. (Although frankly, this comes across as more of a stall tactic rather than waiting on a claim OK - particularly if the scum have daytalk, but whatever.)
So, even if Manders' claim is uninspiring and the consensus is to follow through with her lynch - I'd still like to get a whole lot more posts in today. I've been pretty spammy thus far, but I've got a ways to go yet; it feeds into why I asked the previous group question, though, so they have to be legit posts. It's not the end of the world if I don't, but I think it's in the town's best interest if I end the day as the top poster, at a minimum.
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
I'm sorry,
DaveManders. I'm afraid I can't do that.@DYH: In that case, I will resume lurking.
Random Mafia 2 Town MVP
'08 MTGS Fantasy Football Overall Champion
Best Non-SK Neutral Performance (Individual)
I should expect nothing less from someone with such an awesome avatar, however. (Hooray for Burn Notice!)
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
It certainly could be argued as such, yes. It's wrong, though.
My claim:
I'm Cyan, Town Impossible Perma Roleblocker. Once a day, when someone claims, I can put, in bold font, IMPOSSIBLE! in the thread, and that person will be permablocked. It does say that person will be notified via PM that they were targeted whether they lied about their role or not. I have the standard town win condition, but I do not know it.
So, there ya go.
Have fun with that.
Mkay.
Tired of corporate corruption ruining your favorite MtG site?
Come join ours!!
We even have Mafia!!
You mean the standard win condition that's in the SAMPLE TOWN PM at the start of the thread?
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
It's not in my town role PM.
Unvote Vote: DYH
You'd know that if you were town.
Tired of corporate corruption ruining your favorite MtG site?
Come join ours!!
We even have Mafia!!
LMAO - that's because you don't have a town PM, Manders. I know exactly what's in it, thank you very much.
Regardless, the fact you coincidentally claimed the same exact ability as what you had in RtA (as scum) without so much as batting an eyelash about it is comical. Especially considering, ya know, since you can't seem to recall details from that very same game.
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
I don't recall being called out for being stoic. OH ****ING WELL.
I remember everything else about that game.
I was NOT a perma-blocker as I am here.
Leaving now. Much more to say later.
Tired of corporate corruption ruining your favorite MtG site?
Come join ours!!
We even have Mafia!!
Random Mafia 2 Town MVP
'08 MTGS Fantasy Football Overall Champion
Best Non-SK Neutral Performance (Individual)
See here:
Remember? Kind of like, oh I don't know, permanently role blocking them? This didn't strike you the least bit odd when you got your role PM? Like - Hey! I've seen something like this before! No? I'm guessing because you just came up with it from your subconscious. Or you have a really terrible memory - which you claim not to have, so hell if I know.
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
Fine, I'll wait, mostly because of what you just mentioned.
Maders seems to be fighting you on this.
They hate us cause they ain't us.
Well, she's scum - go figure.
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
If there ARE townies that have the exact WC in their role PM and not what I have in mind, I am personally going to kick Seppel in the shin when I see him in February.
Because that is some ****ing bull****.
Now that I'm not rushing out the door, allow me to elaborate.
Yeah, I was a ONE TIME permablocker in RtA. I remember that very well. I used it on Ged N2.
Here, I am a MULTI-USE permablocker. Which makes it even cooler.
Now, two things I want you to consider. And don't come at me with "RAWR WIFOM", actually consider what I'm about to say:
1) If I actually were scum with this role, why the **** would I claim it? Ever? Did I claim it in RtA? Hmm? No, I absolutely would have lied. I even told Seppel I could never claim this if I got pushed to claim because it wouldn't save ****. But, honesty is the best policy.
2) I got lynched D1 in GHS because I didn't provide the right town WC. You HONESTLY think, if I was scum, that I wouldn't have checked the first post to verify what my WC should be? Guardman can ****ing attest to this **** being true.
That said, Unvote.
Knowing Seppel, I wouldn't put it past him to give some townies the WC and some townies what I got to prevent from being able to clear people based on WC BS. So, I implore you, please just wait until everybody confirms or denies that they have the ACTUAL town WC (I ran out of room on my phone so could someone please post)
Tired of corporate corruption ruining your favorite MtG site?
Come join ours!!
We even have Mafia!!
And still ridiculously similar.
RAWR WIFOM
(also, you had daytalk and two really good partners in RtA.)
Mmhmm. Noted.
I didn't forget.
Riiiiight - so he'd put it - IN THE SAMPLE TOWN PM? Are you serious?
Oh I'll gladly post.
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
Yeah, nothing's wrong with my win con, either.
And, yes, this is an appeal to emotion. I don't ****ing care. I really want to play this game.
No, I'm trying to not get lynched. I will stop posting for now so DYH can get ahead of me.
Just, please, at LEAST verify if all townies have the actual town WC. Please, cause I know for a fact they do not, and I don't believe I'm the only one.
Tired of corporate corruption ruining your favorite MtG site?
Come join ours!!
We even have Mafia!!
Man. I wish I had a daykill right now.
I've got no problem with that; even if someone's willing to risk their neck for you (because I think every townie has the standard WC and the only way we'll find a dissenter is if you have a scum buddy with a brass pair), we can then address how anti-town your role is at that point. Or how your behavior doesn't match up with your claim - this is a provable role, yet you were condemning your "I'm lynched" fate earlier. Or any number of various and sundry scummy things you've managed to do in under 50 posts!
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
Please don't troll me. At least show me that much respect.
Ok, NOW I'm done posting for now.
Tired of corporate corruption ruining your favorite MtG site?
Come join ours!!
We even have Mafia!!
Anyone else get this feeling when reading through these Manders posts and this WC stuff?
Yes, it's a lot like that.
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
Okay, what useful analysis?
Or is it a secret?
I would *shrug*
Then I would ask you if double-posting would be bad for me in this game. As in, dangerous in some way. Then, depending on what you said, we might have a conversation.
Now it appears you are just saying you want to be the highest poster. Is that right, or is there something else?
Ugh. I don't really care much for this. Like, Manders has just said she's about to claim, and you are like, ready to vote and end the day whenever you want guys!
Are you saying this ability completely shuts down another player? Any ability or abilities they might have? Regardless of whether they are false-claiming or not? So if someone had theoretically "joke" claimed early on you could perma-block them for the rest of the game? You don't mention any kind of timing restrictions on when you do this. Does it have to be immediately? Do you have to "quote" the claim post? Can you wait until the end of the day?
That's my biggest concern with this claim as presented.
No offense, but I have zero interest in just letting you get any particular target number of posts today.
I have no time to go and review people's old games these days, so I'm going to cop out and ask other people here if they know of a game or games where Manders went flying off the handle ****ing every other sentence, and was frustrated Town? Because the few games I remember playing with her she didn't do this. Of course, one time I remember she was Town (Indiana Jones) and one time scum (Joss Whedon), so that doesn't tell me very much.
In that case, I don't have to stop posting now.
@ Guardman: Why did you refuse to comment on my statement about GHS?
@ PJ: Please confirm or deny that you have the EXACT ACTUAL Town WC in your role PM.
Tired of corporate corruption ruining your favorite MtG site?
Come join ours!!
We even have Mafia!!
How many countries can you name without looking at a map?
Manders: what are you talking about?
Please don't patronize me.
I'm not sure how much clearer I can make this.
In my role PM, next to win condition, it says I have the standard win condition, but I do not know what it is.
Tired of corporate corruption ruining your favorite MtG site?
Come join ours!!
We even have Mafia!!
Sorry, I just had to say it.