There might have been a recent adaptation of functionality that I'm not aware of, but typically this would require 'As ~ enters the battelfield' to function that way.
Once again, I believe this adaptation has ruined what was good isolated territory; which provides development options; preserves coherence or force majeure; and serves as a merit for uniqueness and individuality towards the fantasy flare of the game.
Some other notable adaptions like this (that I don't like) are indestructible and unblockable. They should have remained as they were, as these are not abilities, they are states of being. Their identity wants and needs this uniqueness, this force majeure. Of course, there are other states of being (such as Shadow)—but it can't be reflected this way—so the ability context is used instead). This is perfectly fine, but so long as you can enrapture that 'state of being' with its unique and alternative wording composure, you want and need to do that.
Other adaptations I believe serve as adulterations to the original concept, such as Hexproof 'from a source'. This strips away the grandeur and force majeure of 'hexproof'. I do understand they were seeking to open up interaction with this adaptation, and that's absolutely great for the balance and fun the game. But they should have simply come up with another keyword as to not infringe on the 'domain of Hexproof' and thus water it down as this adaptation does.
If I had to fix the game as it stands, it would require a major rollback on a lot of stuff.
So... keeeping in mind that the “recent adaptation of functionality” DOES exist, is it your intention to change the card to function as you intend or is this card idea simply a lost cause in your eyes?
Was "force majeure" on your word of the day calendar for today?
As to the wording on clone, it only used "As this enters" wording in Onslaught. When it was next printed in M10 and since it has used "You may have this enter as a copy".
So... keeeping in mind that the “recent adaptation of functionality” DOES exist, is it your intention to change the card to function as you intend or is this card idea simply a lost cause in your eyes?
Pretty much is a lost cause.
Just for the record though, Bake into a Pie is another example of poor implementation. It should have just been 'Bake into Pie' to preserve the force majeure and flare of fantasy (that of a spell's name in a spell book).
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Once again, I believe this adaptation has ruined what was good isolated territory; which provides development options; preserves coherence or force majeure; and serves as a merit for uniqueness and individuality towards the fantasy flare of the game.
Some other notable adaptions like this (that I don't like) are indestructible and unblockable. They should have remained as they were, as these are not abilities, they are states of being. Their identity wants and needs this uniqueness, this force majeure. Of course, there are other states of being (such as Shadow)—but it can't be reflected this way—so the ability context is used instead). This is perfectly fine, but so long as you can enrapture that 'state of being' with its unique and alternative wording composure, you want and need to do that.
Other adaptations I believe serve as adulterations to the original concept, such as Hexproof 'from a source'. This strips away the grandeur and force majeure of 'hexproof'. I do understand they were seeking to open up interaction with this adaptation, and that's absolutely great for the balance and fun the game. But they should have simply come up with another keyword as to not infringe on the 'domain of Hexproof' and thus water it down as this adaptation does.
If I had to fix the game as it stands, it would require a major rollback on a lot of stuff.
As to the wording on clone, it only used "As this enters" wording in Onslaught. When it was next printed in M10 and since it has used "You may have this enter as a copy".
Pretty much is a lost cause.
Just for the record though, Bake into a Pie is another example of poor implementation. It should have just been 'Bake into Pie' to preserve the force majeure and flare of fantasy (that of a spell's name in a spell book).