Fadeblue
-Creativity 4/5 - Other creature have done the damaging you get counters thing but not as interestingly as these. They are not ground breaking but unique!
-Wording 5/5 - There does not seem to be any problems with the wording
-Flavor 4.5/5 -They all have spot on flavor as far as color goes but some colors do not like putting there abilities on there creatures
-Round Fulfillment 5/5 - They do what they are suppose to do.
-Bonus 2/5 - Sorry you could not find pictures
20.5
Salubrious
Creativity 4/5 Originally I gave you a three here but now I realize these are quite different
Wording 3/5 Well I have no idea how to word this properly but I do not that it is not right as is. But if you are going to do something like this you have to expect that
Flavor 4/5: All of them creature a effect or a creature that fits its color
Round Fulfillment 5/5: Again it does what it need do
Bonus 5/5: You did all the bonuses
21
That was close. Honestly I liked Fadeblue’s cards more but I judge on a rubric and it says you did better..
Match 2: Blue_Izual and Eliminator
Eliminator
Creativity 3/5: I like the three color spells but they do nothing we have not seen before
Wording 5/5: the wording is all right
Flavor 5/5: They all follow there colors and add things which are in the right color
Round Fulfillment 5/5: Is anyone not going to get a 5/5 here?
Bonus 2/5
20
Blue_Izual
Creativity 1/5: Ok they are original but I can not punish you anywhere else! These are broken and I am sorry but I have to subtract somewhere
Wording 4/5: It is close to right but just a little off
Flavor 4/5: They are all in color but again I take some off due to how good they are
Round: 5/5: Job done
Bonus 2/5
16
Well there you have it. Exit polls are not up on everyone else so I will reserve judgment on them!
Suggestion: a "balance" category, to discourage OMG BROKEN cards.
Edit: my ideas for categories, fleshed out:
Balance: is the card too weak? Too powerful? Obviously unplayable/completely broken cards get 1's, if you honestly can't tell how good it is, that's 5 material. The feeling of "wow, I want to go out and build ten decks around this card" falls under this category, too.
Flavor: how evocative is this card? Do you get an image of this happening/seeing this creature, and do all the abilities fit this? If the abilities make no sense flavor-wise, 1. If you get a picture in your head of exactly what the art would look like with no art description, 5.
Reality: could you really imagine pulling this card from a pack? If the wording is off, the ability is green and the card is black, the card doesn't work under the rules, etc, 1. If you wouldn't be at all surprised if this was MaRo leaking a card from the next set, 5.
Creativity: how "obvious" is this card? Has it been done a billion times before the exact same way? Did 5 other people submit similiar cards? If so, 1. If you never would have thought of this ability in a million years, 5.
Rules following: no points, just deductions of up to 5 for not following the rules.
Wolfwood Sama on MTGO (Westane for PureMTGO community events)
UR - Burning Vengeance
BG - The Rock
RUG - RUG Control
BBB - Zombies
Wolfwood Sama on MTGO (Westane for PureMTGO community events)
UR - Burning Vengeance
BG - The Rock
RUG - RUG Control
BBB - Zombies
08 - fadeblue**08 - Salubrious**
10 - Qwerty**10 - eci4
05 - Landkiller05 - Planesjaywalker**
07 - blue_izual**07 - Eliminator**
09 - bobinite09 - Jeekc
Match 1: Fadeblue and Salubrious
Fadeblue
-Creativity 4/5 - Other creature have done the damaging you get counters thing but not as interestingly as these. They are not ground breaking but unique!
-Wording 5/5 - There does not seem to be any problems with the wording
-Flavor 4.5/5 -They all have spot on flavor as far as color goes but some colors do not like putting there abilities on there creatures
-Round Fulfillment 5/5 - They do what they are suppose to do.
-Bonus 2/5 - Sorry you could not find pictures
20.5
Salubrious
Creativity 4/5 Originally I gave you a three here but now I realize these are quite different
Wording 3/5 Well I have no idea how to word this properly but I do not that it is not right as is. But if you are going to do something like this you have to expect that
Flavor 4/5: All of them creature a effect or a creature that fits its color
Round Fulfillment 5/5: Again it does what it need do
Bonus 5/5: You did all the bonuses
21
That was close. Honestly I liked Fadeblue’s cards more but I judge on a rubric and it says you did better..
Match 2: Blue_Izual and Eliminator
Eliminator
Creativity 3/5: I like the three color spells but they do nothing we have not seen before
Wording 5/5: the wording is all right
Flavor 5/5: They all follow there colors and add things which are in the right color
Round Fulfillment 5/5: Is anyone not going to get a 5/5 here?
Bonus 2/5
20
Blue_Izual
Creativity 1/5: Ok they are original but I can not punish you anywhere else! These are broken and I am sorry but I have to subtract somewhere
Wording 4/5: It is close to right but just a little off
Flavor 4/5: They are all in color but again I take some off due to how good they are
Round: 5/5: Job done
Bonus 2/5
16
Well there you have it. Exit polls are not up on everyone else so I will reserve judgment on them!
Edit: my ideas for categories, fleshed out:
Balance: is the card too weak? Too powerful? Obviously unplayable/completely broken cards get 1's, if you honestly can't tell how good it is, that's 5 material. The feeling of "wow, I want to go out and build ten decks around this card" falls under this category, too.
Flavor: how evocative is this card? Do you get an image of this happening/seeing this creature, and do all the abilities fit this? If the abilities make no sense flavor-wise, 1. If you get a picture in your head of exactly what the art would look like with no art description, 5.
Reality: could you really imagine pulling this card from a pack? If the wording is off, the ability is green and the card is black, the card doesn't work under the rules, etc, 1. If you wouldn't be at all surprised if this was MaRo leaking a card from the next set, 5.
Creativity: how "obvious" is this card? Has it been done a billion times before the exact same way? Did 5 other people submit similiar cards? If so, 1. If you never would have thought of this ability in a million years, 5.
Rules following: no points, just deductions of up to 5 for not following the rules.
WINNERS:
Plainswalker
5kyh16h91
Athani
Planesjaywalker
TIES:
Zirlian and RickCorgan
The Full Results:
1:
Zirlian (TIE)
None Submitted
-Creativity 0/5
-Wording 0/5
-Flavor 0/5
-Round Fulfillment 0/5
-Bonus 0/5
TOTAL: -20
VS
RickCorgan (TIE)
None Submitted
-Creativity 0/5
-Wording 0/5
-Flavor 0/5
-Round Fulfillment 0/5
-Bonus 0/5
TOTAL: -20
2:
Plainswalker (WINNER)
X minus Cycle
-Creativity 4/5
-Wording 3/5
-Flavor 4/5
-Round Fulfillment 5/5
-Bonus 0/5
TOTAL: 16
VS
GPM
None Submitted
-Creativity 0/5
-Wording 0/5
-Flavor 0/5
-Round Fulfillment 0/5
-Bonus 0/5
TOTAL: -20
3:
5kyh16h91 (WINNER)
Blessing Cycle
-Creativity 5/5
-Wording 5/5
-Flavor 4/5
-Round Fulfillment 5/5
-Bonus 1/5
TOTAL: 20
VS
Cantripmancer
Time Cycle
-Creativity 5/5
-Wording 4/5
-Flavor 4/5
-Round Fulfillment 5/5
-Bonus 1/5
TOTAL: 19
4:
Gerg
Lash Cycle
-Creativity 4/5
-Wording 2/5
-Flavor 5/5
-Round Fulfillment 3/5
-Bonus 1/5
TOTAL: 7
VS
Athani (WINNER)
Enemy Color Winds Cycle
-Creativity 4/5
-Wording 5/5
-Flavor 4/5
-Round Fulfillment 5/5
-Bonus 1/5
TOTAL: 19
5:
Planesjaywalker (WINNER)
Tsubo Cycle
-Creativity 5/5
-Wording 4/5
-Flavor 5/5
-Round Fulfillment 5/5
-Bonus 2/5
TOTAL: 21
VS
Landkiller
None Submitted
-Creativity 0/5
-Wording 0/5
-Flavor 0/5
-Round Fulfillment 0/5
-Bonus 0/5
TOTAL: -20
Thanks to iloveatogs for the great Banner!
and Zoobamaphooza for the great Avatar!