Regarding the honorable mention card,
I like the concept of it a lot. It would definitely need to cost more though, because as it is it's a strictly better Negate. And Negate is already top tier.
What! Where have I been... My card got honorable mention! Thanks everyone, I'm not sure how the whole card of the month works so I wasn't expecting this and more than one nomination, yay!.. The winning card is awesome though!
Tokens don't know the name of the card that made them? How parentally sad.
Actually, after all that fuss I made (repeatedly) over the "a card named" part, I came across potentially relevant templates in equipment, particularly Shuriken. I don't know if you consider it worth your time to PM Woapalanne or Condor to get a more reliable answer, but I admit there's a very good chance I was wrong.
Actually, after all that fuss I made (repeatedly) over the "a card named" part, I came across potentially relevant templates in equipment, particularly Shuriken. I don't know if you consider it worth your time to PM Woapalanne or Condor to get a more reliable answer, but I admit there's a very good chance I was wrong.
Objects changing zones is a key difference there, though. I don't know if you're right, but I don't think that card indicates you're wrong.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
The Golden Rule of forums: If you're going to be rude, be right. If you might be wrong, be polite.
Before next month's card comes up, just want to say that I checked with Woapalanne and he seemed fine with the "exiled with Thoughtflock" wording, although he didn't specifically say anything about the issue that some people brought up with, say, Muse Vessel or Void Maw referring to themselves, while this wording goes on a token.
Before next month's card comes up, just want to say that I checked with Woapalanne and he seemed fine with the "exiled with Thoughtflock" wording, although he didn't specifically say anything about the issue that some people brought up with, say, Muse Vessel or Void Maw referring to themselves, while this wording goes on a token.
After some searching in the Comp Rules, I'm 99% sure I was wrong.
Quote from "Comp Rules" »
606.1a An ability printed on an object within another ability that grants that ability to that object is still considered to be "printed on" that object for these purposes.
In spite of being the most ambiguous sentence in the entire Comp Rules, I think this does more or less prove that the abilities can be linked (which I believe covers the "objects changing zones" issue Kraj mentioned) even if the object that created the abilities isn't the object that has the abilities, and I think Shuriken shows that an object can have an ability that references another card's name without saying "[thing] named [name]." So it all looks good.
Except that you did forget to call it a "creature" token.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
You still forgot that part.
Die Fools!!!
Looking for a Pokemon RP:
http://pokemonhaven223.proboards.com
Indulge your inner trainer today....
I like the concept of it a lot. It would definitely need to cost more though, because as it is it's a strictly better Negate. And Negate is already top tier.
Multicolored millcards in something other than dimir.
Actually, after all that fuss I made (repeatedly) over the "a card named" part, I came across potentially relevant templates in equipment, particularly Shuriken. I don't know if you consider it worth your time to PM Woapalanne or Condor to get a more reliable answer, but I admit there's a very good chance I was wrong.
Coming soon.
Objects changing zones is a key difference there, though. I don't know if you're right, but I don't think that card indicates you're wrong.
Current New Favorite Person™: Mallory Archer
She knows why.
After some searching in the Comp Rules, I'm 99% sure I was wrong.
In spite of being the most ambiguous sentence in the entire Comp Rules, I think this does more or less prove that the abilities can be linked (which I believe covers the "objects changing zones" issue Kraj mentioned) even if the object that created the abilities isn't the object that has the abilities, and I think Shuriken shows that an object can have an ability that references another card's name without saying "[thing] named [name]." So it all looks good.
Except that you did forget to call it a "creature" token.