Some of you may think that you have made great mistakes in your lives, and perhaps you have. But let me ask you this.... did you ever play strip poker with two fat chicks and win?
If there is no infinite multi kicker this card is not immba imo.
Should be 5 mana maybe, to prevent players from using it too much in the turn it is cast.
So would coroless spells be 1 mana accross the board like getting emrakul at on turn 4 lol or quicker if a card just let you place an enchant ment on the field lol
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Check out puca trade a free way to get rid of your junk and cards you don't use often:
when do you usually put up the polls and everything before making the cards?
There are polls up right now, check the Custom Cards Contests and Games forum. We always have the latest poll stickied near the top, thread title starting with "YMTC."
So would coroless spells be 1 mana accross the board like getting emrakul at on turn 4 lol or quicker if a card just let you place an enchant ment on the field lol
"Additional cost" does not refer to the amount of colorless mana in a card's normal mana cost, is refers to cards that specify in the text box that you must do something "as an additional cost to cast" it, like Flesh Allergy. There are also some keywords like multikicker, buyback, and retrace that use this wording.
This card is stupid, and doesn't really work within the rules. You'd have to add something to the comp rules as to what happens when fling doesn't have anything sacrificed to it.
The card works fine within the rules, though the wording is poor I agree. As for your specific example, because there is no sacrificed creature, fling would deal 0 damage, since undefined quantities default to zero.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"In the beginning, MTG Salvation switched to a new forum format.
This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move."
It was at that moment that I realized: I'm kinda just making these things up. We can just write the rules the way we want them to work. People will have fun, and people will get it.
The card is flat broken. Forget the awful rules interactions, the fact that there are some additional costs that should just never be skirted makes this card a bad option.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Currently playing
WE DEMAND A SACRIFICE
Night Shift
Karrthus, Tyrant of Dragons
Some of you may think that you have made great mistakes in your lives, and perhaps you have. But let me ask you this.... did you ever play strip poker with two fat chicks and win?
Cockatrice name: Ninja Nate
Then there's Sadistic Sacrament :X
Should be 5 mana maybe, to prevent players from using it too much in the turn it is cast.
Anyways: cool card!
https://pucatrade.com/invite/gift/47609
There are polls up right now, check the Custom Cards Contests and Games forum. We always have the latest poll stickied near the top, thread title starting with "YMTC."
"Additional cost" does not refer to the amount of colorless mana in a card's normal mana cost, is refers to cards that specify in the text box that you must do something "as an additional cost to cast" it, like Flesh Allergy. There are also some keywords like multikicker, buyback, and retrace that use this wording.
The card works fine within the rules, though the wording is poor I agree. As for your specific example, because there is no sacrificed creature, fling would deal 0 damage, since undefined quantities default to zero.
This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move."
Comic Book Set
Archester: Frontier of Steam (A steampunk set!)
A Good Place to Start Designing
The card is flat broken. Forget the awful rules interactions, the fact that there are some additional costs that should just never be skirted makes this card a bad option.