with what the poster says i would lean more toward it removes your library and then goes to the top after it is cast or i might copy itself during you r upkeep but it doesn't seem like you get to cst anything else for the remander of the game
I don't know... I could see final fortune-esque cards...
(These are pure, un-orb-based speculation)
2RRR
Epic Sorcery
~ deals X damage to target creature or player, where X is the number of permenants in play. At end of turn, sacrifice all permenants you control. You lose the game
3GGG
Epic Sorcery
Untap all lands you control. Lands you control lose all mana abilities, and become 3/3 creatures. At end of turn, sacrifice all permenants you countol. You lose the game
1UUU
Epic Sorcery
Discard your hand, then draw your library. At end of turn, sacrifice all permenants you countol. You lose the game.
3WWW
Epic Sorcery
Destroy all permenants you don't control. At end of turn, sacrifice all permenants you countol. You lose the game
2BBB
Epic Sorcery
Destroy all permenants. Then each player loses life equal to the number of cards in that player's graveyard. At end of turn, You lose the game
Card Drawer
UUU
Epic Instant
Draw 2 cards. At the beginning of your upkeep, you may put a copy of this spell on the stack and play it. If you do, you may not play any other spells during that turn.
Terrible wording (I'm not great with templating) but a kind of Panoptic Mirror type effect that allows continual spell recursion but with drawbacks.
Can't wait to see the scan/pictures of this poster, and I hope also that Leben can get us some other promotional material on Saviors too while he's at it!
... oh and I'll be going to the Saviors prerelease in *Exactly* 2 weeks this minute, I love being a day ahead of everyone... (It's 8am Saturday morning here in NZ!!!)
... oh and I'll be going to the Saviors prerelease in *Exactly* 2 weeks this minute, I love being a day ahead of everyone... (It's 8am Saturday morning here in NZ!!!)
In that case, can we count on you to help complete the set in case we don't get all the information?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
EDIT: something no one mentioned yet about who opened this thread: this thread started with his very first post, so that makes a very low post count... and he didn't yet show any photo of the poster. How can we be sure he's just not messing around with us?
one simple reason. why fake a poster? those are easy to look out for. cards are harder to prove real., if done right.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Randall 0705 - 2219 - 6000 and my pokemon safari is water, Azumarill Bibarel and Floatzel
Quote from "Megiddo" »
i like banning people because it makes people I don't like go away
Am I the only one reminded of Prophecy's oh-so-lacking "huge" spells? :slant:
In my eyes that might not be so bad, considering all the mana acceleration in this current environment. For example the land search used in T&N, Snakes (special props to orochi leafcaller ), etc.
In my eyes that might not be so bad, considering all the mana acceleration in this current environment. For example the land search used in T&N, Snakes (special props to orochi leafcaller ), etc.
Anyways, by the poster, I think it implies something like
Supah Blazing Shoal - RR
Instant
As an additional cost to play this spell, drain your life to 0. You dont lose this turn due to lack of life.
Target creature gets +x/+0, where X is the ammount of life you lost this way.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Jedit, regarding Walls »
"OK, lads, here they come! Move that Wall of Stone ... a-one, a-two, and a-THREE!"
Quote from dragyn_mage »
I think assaulting another player should have a range of penalties. (A light slap is a game loss, a kick in the nuts is a DQ, ghetto-stomping someone is a Ban for Life.) There could be article all about it, like "when to mulligan"
EDIT: something no one mentioned yet about who opened this thread: this thread started with his very first post, so that makes a very low post count... and he didn't yet show any photo of the poster. How can we be sure he's just not messing around with us?
I was thinking the same thing. This person may be giving a fake poster based on our already speculation. I think the idsea may very well be ture but can any one confirm the actual poster. I'm not going to go out and call fake yet but confirmation would be nice.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
High Mage of Frontier Knowledge in the [Izzet] clan:symru: Want to know the secret to chaos Click Here
The word Epic appears exactly ten times in the orb. As most people have already guessed, I am also guessing that either it is one or two cycles of five cards. IF the red spell deals damage, the word "Epic" won't be in their names, since damage spells always reference themselved in their text boxes, while others do not (i.e., "Lava Spike deals 3 damage to target player" but not "Unsummon returns target creature to its owners hand").
Speculations? Might the red spell NOT deal damage, thus freeing up the name possibility?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
DCI Certified Level 1 Judge
Remember, kids: Never fight with Flashback, 'cause Flashback always wins.
I was thinking the same thing. This person may be giving a fake poster based on our already speculation. I think the idsea may very well be ture but can any one confirm the actual poster. I'm not going to go out and call fake yet but confirmation would be nice.
This rumor season is so dry, ill take the next thread posted by tingledick as true.
Not really, but new rumors are nice.
Who would fake a poster? >_> Its not that its important or anything.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Jedit, regarding Walls »
"OK, lads, here they come! Move that Wall of Stone ... a-one, a-two, and a-THREE!"
Quote from dragyn_mage »
I think assaulting another player should have a range of penalties. (A light slap is a game loss, a kick in the nuts is a DQ, ghetto-stomping someone is a Ban for Life.) There could be article all about it, like "when to mulligan"
The word Epic appears exactly ten times in the orb. As most people have already guessed, I am also guessing that either it is one or two cycles of five cards. IF the red spell deals damage, the word "Epic" won't be in their names, since damage spells always reference themselved in their text boxes, while others do not (i.e., "Lava Spike deals 3 damage to target player" but not "Unsummon returns target creature to its owners hand").
Speculations? Might the red spell NOT deal damage, thus freeing up the name possibility?
red epic spell is in the picture hack thread. pretty sure it deals damage. I don't see why this would necessarily be a problem is epic is in the name. if each is epic <foo> and metions itself in the textbox once then that's 10 instances, no?
red epic spell is in the picture hack thread. pretty sure it deals damage. I don't see why this would necessarily be a problem is epic is in the name. if each is epic <foo> and metions itself in the textbox once then that's 10 instances, no?
Yeah, except that people want 2 sets of epics, one for creatures and one for spells.
I too agree that each is going to be self referential.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Jedit, regarding Walls »
"OK, lads, here they come! Move that Wall of Stone ... a-one, a-two, and a-THREE!"
Quote from dragyn_mage »
I think assaulting another player should have a range of penalties. (A light slap is a game loss, a kick in the nuts is a DQ, ghetto-stomping someone is a Ban for Life.) There could be article all about it, like "when to mulligan"
red epic spell is in the picture hack thread. pretty sure it deals damage. I don't see why this would necessarily be a problem is epic is in the name. if each is epic <foo> and metions itself in the textbox once then that's 10 instances, no?
My thing is that the other colored Epic spells have no reason to reference themselves, only one that deals damage. Unless all the Epic spells reference themselves in some other way, in which case the red one would have Epic on it three times:
Red Epic Thingy RRRRRRRRR
Sorcery
Red Epic Thingy deals 45809435903 damage to target creature or player.
An opponent searches your library for all cards named Red Epic Thingy and removes them from the game.
Three times, where the others would only be two, thus getting eleven total, which is wrong.
Edit - Yeah, now that I just thought about it, the spell can't extract you for anything, since the rules say you can just fail to find a card with specific characteristics. "An opponent searches your library..." would work, but there are multiple problems with that, not the least of which is that "searches" doesn't appear in the orb. Thus Extraction is out, and (I think) either Epic isn't in the name OR the Red spell doesn't deal damage.
Fran and the Dreschers
Now playing at Crunked Up Rhinos House of Waffles
YEEAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!
Props to Grim for the Sig. OKKKKAAAYYYY!!
Legendary Epic Enchantment
Haste
:symtap:: Lightning Bolt.
You cannot play spells.
Or
Epic Bolt :symr::symr::symr:
Legendary Epic Enchantment
Treat all cards in your library hand and grave yard as Lightning Bolts.
Or same as above only with something like imprint.
(These are pure, un-orb-based speculation)
2RRR
Epic Sorcery
~ deals X damage to target creature or player, where X is the number of permenants in play. At end of turn, sacrifice all permenants you control. You lose the game
3GGG
Epic Sorcery
Untap all lands you control. Lands you control lose all mana abilities, and become 3/3 creatures. At end of turn, sacrifice all permenants you countol. You lose the game
1UUU
Epic Sorcery
Discard your hand, then draw your library. At end of turn, sacrifice all permenants you countol. You lose the game.
3WWW
Epic Sorcery
Destroy all permenants you don't control. At end of turn, sacrifice all permenants you countol. You lose the game
2BBB
Epic Sorcery
Destroy all permenants. Then each player loses life equal to the number of cards in that player's graveyard. At end of turn, You lose the game
costs are hard to predict though....
'buster
HR Analyst. Gamer. Activist | Fearless, and forthright | Aggro-control is a mindset.
Elspeth and Jhoira rock my world.
Card Drawer
UUU
Epic Instant
Draw 2 cards. At the beginning of your upkeep, you may put a copy of this spell on the stack and play it. If you do, you may not play any other spells during that turn.
Terrible wording (I'm not great with templating) but a kind of Panoptic Mirror type effect that allows continual spell recursion but with drawbacks.
Official Weenie chef of ARD
Do you rogue? Accepting new members now!
(:symrg:.:symrg:)
c(> <)
U U
... oh and I'll be going to the Saviors prerelease in *Exactly* 2 weeks this minute, I love being a day ahead of everyone... (It's 8am Saturday morning here in NZ!!!)
In that case, can we count on you to help complete the set in case we don't get all the information?
one simple reason. why fake a poster? those are easy to look out for. cards are harder to prove real., if done right.
www.diestoremoval.com
A truly great petition
Of course!!!!!
I'll post the full spoiler and images as I get them, i'll have my lap-top and digital camera wth me on the day for us!:grin2:
...Can't wait!
In my eyes that might not be so bad, considering all the mana acceleration in this current environment. For example the land search used in T&N, Snakes (special props to orochi leafcaller ), etc.
Leafcaller? Im sure you meant Sacme Elder.
Anyways, by the poster, I think it implies something like
Supah Blazing Shoal - RR
Instant
As an additional cost to play this spell, drain your life to 0. You dont lose this turn due to lack of life.
Target creature gets +x/+0, where X is the ammount of life you lost this way.
I was thinking the same thing. This person may be giving a fake poster based on our already speculation. I think the idsea may very well be ture but can any one confirm the actual poster. I'm not going to go out and call fake yet but confirmation would be nice.
High Mage of Frontier Knowledge in the [Izzet] clan:symru: Want to know the secret to chaos Click Here
Speculations? Might the red spell NOT deal damage, thus freeing up the name possibility?
Remember, kids: Never fight with Flashback, 'cause Flashback always wins.
This rumor season is so dry, ill take the next thread posted by tingledick as true.
Not really, but new rumors are nice.
Who would fake a poster? >_> Its not that its important or anything.
red epic spell is in the picture hack thread. pretty sure it deals damage. I don't see why this would necessarily be a problem is epic is in the name. if each is epic <foo> and metions itself in the textbox once then that's 10 instances, no?
Yeah, except that people want 2 sets of epics, one for creatures and one for spells.
I too agree that each is going to be self referential.
My thing is that the other colored Epic spells have no reason to reference themselves, only one that deals damage. Unless all the Epic spells reference themselves in some other way, in which case the red one would have Epic on it three times:
Red Epic Thingy RRRRRRRRR
Sorcery
Red Epic Thingy deals 45809435903 damage to target creature or player.
An opponent searches your library for all cards named Red Epic Thingy and removes them from the game.
Three times, where the others would only be two, thus getting eleven total, which is wrong.
Edit - Yeah, now that I just thought about it, the spell can't extract you for anything, since the rules say you can just fail to find a card with specific characteristics. "An opponent searches your library..." would work, but there are multiple problems with that, not the least of which is that "searches" doesn't appear in the orb. Thus Extraction is out, and (I think) either Epic isn't in the name OR the Red spell doesn't deal damage.
Remember, kids: Never fight with Flashback, 'cause Flashback always wins.