downside is it hits your creatures too so if you just splash snow lands to play it hits your creatures
Which has always been the case with sweepers. At least with this there's a chance it's not symmetrical if you run snow creatures. Otherwise, just go creaturless.
Why go creatureless though? It counts all snow permanents you control, so you might as well run snow creatures to increase the snow count. A boreal druid is also a snow permanent.
downside is it hits your creatures too so if you just splash snow lands to play it hits your creatures
Which has always been the case with sweepers. At least with this there's a chance it's not symmetrical if you run snow creatures. Otherwise, just go creaturless.
Why go creatureless though? It counts all snow permanents you control, so you might as well run snow creatures to increase the snow count. A boreal druid is also a snow permanent.
Cause right now existing creature-less decks would love this. The full set is not yet out yet so we have yet to see if snow gets a critical mass of stuff worth using or not.
Boreal druid is a bad card unless you can really use the snow feature.
downside is it hits your creatures too so if you just splash snow lands to play it hits your creatures
Which has always been the case with sweepers. At least with this there's a chance it's not symmetrical if you run snow creatures. Otherwise, just go creaturless.
Why go creatureless though? It counts all snow permanents you control, so you might as well run snow creatures to increase the snow count. A boreal druid is also a snow permanent.
Cause right now existing creature-less decks would love this. The full set is not yet out yet so we have yet to see if snow gets a critical mass of stuff worth using or not.
Boreal druid is a bad card unless you can really use the snow feature.
GB snow eldrazi? Green lets you run stirrings and boreal druid. You get a sweeper that you can control to some extent. Prismatic vista can fetch a waste or a snow basic.
You have boreal druid and stirrings T1 to help you fix. T1 druid into t2 temple still gives you a t2 TKS. Then you just fetch basics out if you need a sweeper with any of the 8 fetches.
So that's what 23 lands, 4 druids, 4 stirrings so that leaves you 29 cards for whatever eldrazi and interaction you want? Eldrazi are a heck of a drug if you back them up with discard and gratuitous amounts of removal.
Sweep your board, TKS you, reality smasher is a heck of a chain...
downside is it hits your creatures too so if you just splash snow lands to play it hits your creatures
Which has always been the case with sweepers. At least with this there's a chance it's not symmetrical if you run snow creatures. Otherwise, just go creaturless.
Why go creatureless though? It counts all snow permanents you control, so you might as well run snow creatures to increase the snow count. A boreal druid is also a snow permanent.
Sure,which is exactly why I presented that option.
Cause right now existing creature-less decks would love this. The full set is not yet out yet so we have yet to see if snow gets a critical mass of stuff worth using or not.
Boreal druid is a bad card unless you can really use the snow feature.
Http://www.fantasticneighborhood.com/
Comedy gaming podcast. Listening to it makes you cool.
GB snow eldrazi? Green lets you run stirrings and boreal druid. You get a sweeper that you can control to some extent. Prismatic vista can fetch a waste or a snow basic.
4 eldrazi temple
4 prismatic vista
4 llanorwar wastes
4 verdant catacombs
4 snow covered forest
1 wastes
2 snow covered swamp
You have boreal druid and stirrings T1 to help you fix. T1 druid into t2 temple still gives you a t2 TKS. Then you just fetch basics out if you need a sweeper with any of the 8 fetches.
So that's what 23 lands, 4 druids, 4 stirrings so that leaves you 29 cards for whatever eldrazi and interaction you want? Eldrazi are a heck of a drug if you back them up with discard and gratuitous amounts of removal.
Sweep your board, TKS you, reality smasher is a heck of a chain...
Sure,which is exactly why I presented that option.