I think my inclination would be to either separate out the Bant lists from Naya blue (bolt and nacatl) in new "Bant Knightfall" or "Naya Knightfall" threads, or just put them all under a single Knightfall thread.
The convention on the forum seems to be separating out similar deck strategies which use different colour combinations into separate threads. For instance, Twin has Rug, Grixis and UR threads as the lines of play with each are somewhat different within the Twin strategy. Given that convention, it makes sense to me to divide knightfall along Nacatl / bolt inclusions (Naya blue Knightfall) and exclusions (Bant Knightfall).
Then again, given the relatively small representation presently, I could see keeping it all one thread.
edit: I don't consider Bant company to be a separate deck from Bant Knightfall - no reason to not play the combo. If the bant company thread stays, it would have to be updated to Bant Knightfall imo.
I noticed that the metagame update on Modern Nexus shows Knightfall making its way up to tier 2. I had asked Torpf about the potential for overlap with the Bant Company thread back when he made the primer for Knightfall, which he mentioned we could address should the deck put up results. So perhaps we should address the overlap before Knightfall is put in tier 2. There are two main builds centered around includin nacatl/bolt or not, only one of which overlaps with the Bant Company thread.
However, I feel like there is no sense having a Bant company thread separate from Knightfall as it is basically just one of the builds under that strategy. I'd be ok with merging or even just archiving the thread if the Knightfall thread is going to include discussion (as it does now) of both builds.
Any comment on resolving the overlap here? Naya Company, Bant Company and Knightfall all seem to have some overlap here. Thoughts?
(edit: I'll update the Bant Company primer shortly if we end up keeping it, but it seems somewhat superfluous)
The convention on the forum seems to be separating out similar deck strategies which use different colour combinations into separate threads. For instance, Twin has Rug, Grixis and UR threads as the lines of play with each are somewhat different within the Twin strategy. Given that convention, it makes sense to me to divide knightfall along Nacatl / bolt inclusions (Naya blue Knightfall) and exclusions (Bant Knightfall).
Then again, given the relatively small representation presently, I could see keeping it all one thread.
edit: I don't consider Bant company to be a separate deck from Bant Knightfall - no reason to not play the combo. If the bant company thread stays, it would have to be updated to Bant Knightfall imo.
KnightfallGWUR
Azorius Control UW
Burn RBG
I noticed that the metagame update on Modern Nexus shows Knightfall making its way up to tier 2. I had asked Torpf about the potential for overlap with the Bant Company thread back when he made the primer for Knightfall, which he mentioned we could address should the deck put up results. So perhaps we should address the overlap before Knightfall is put in tier 2. There are two main builds centered around includin nacatl/bolt or not, only one of which overlaps with the Bant Company thread.
However, I feel like there is no sense having a Bant company thread separate from Knightfall as it is basically just one of the builds under that strategy. I'd be ok with merging or even just archiving the thread if the Knightfall thread is going to include discussion (as it does now) of both builds.
Any comment on resolving the overlap here? Naya Company, Bant Company and Knightfall all seem to have some overlap here. Thoughts?
(edit: I'll update the Bant Company primer shortly if we end up keeping it, but it seems somewhat superfluous)
KnightfallGWUR
Azorius Control UW
Burn RBG