I'm coming back to eternal command but I'm starting my 75 with a playset of dark confidant
Weird? I'm not so sure. The one thing that lets me down when I play this deck is a relative lack of card advantage or velocity. Mana, truth be told can be an issue at times but that's nothing unusual for modern.
I'll probably run three Cryptics and three scavenging ooze, set of goyf, plus a bunch of the usual suspects. Fatal push is straightforward, one abrupt decay, two assassin's trophy. After that I'll tweak, with an aim to keep the mana curve as low as possible.
I tried this a couple of years ago and it became my default list for quite some time. I ran four colours (tiny red splash for bolt in the main and ancient grudge in the side) so this brings me to another idea.
Has anyone tried running death's shadow in this deck? I mean if we're taking a bunch of damage from our lands, maybe it's a possibility? We could sub our counterspells for discard (save for the important Cryptic) and it'd make the deck more of a combo midrange deck?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Modern: G Tron, Vannifar, Jund, Druid/Vizier combo, Humans, Eldrazi Stompy (Serum Powder), Amulet, Grishoalbrand, Breach Titan, Turns, Eternal Command, As Foretold Living End, Elves, Cheerios, RUG Scapeshift
I'm at a point now where I'm pretty convinced the utility creatures that we get from running white/bant are better than what we get from other options.
I don't have any experience to back this up, its just a hunch.
Meddling mage, deputy of detentions, spell queller, reflector mage are the ones that stick out to me the most but also:
Knight of the reliquary, Knight of autumn, kataki war's wage, selfless spirit, eidolon of rhetoric, mirran crusader
The hits are significant. Not all of those cards are super relevant all the time but I see an angle here for the deck to pivot around these powerful hatebear-style creatures, while still having the combo as a backup for the long game and against opposing creature strategies.
Any thoughts?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Modern: G Tron, Vannifar, Jund, Druid/Vizier combo, Humans, Eldrazi Stompy (Serum Powder), Amulet, Grishoalbrand, Breach Titan, Turns, Eternal Command, As Foretold Living End, Elves, Cheerios, RUG Scapeshift
I did wonder if this deck could manage to run a Jace or maybe two. It's great for brainstorming away unwanted aether vials. Also, with vial itself and a lot of our cheap interaction we should have an OK time protecting Jace even from turn 4.
It's also another angle to attack from and the -1 on Jace can actually enable some sweet vial lines. That's niche but relevant.
Not saying it's the new hotness but as a one or two-of in here I think it's decent. Certainly would have a useful function.
What's more interesting is how positioned this deck will be going forward. More kolaghan's commands floating about doesn't seem great but hey. Could be decent?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Modern: G Tron, Vannifar, Jund, Druid/Vizier combo, Humans, Eldrazi Stompy (Serum Powder), Amulet, Grishoalbrand, Breach Titan, Turns, Eternal Command, As Foretold Living End, Elves, Cheerios, RUG Scapeshift
That sounds a lot more like a RUG Scapeshift splashing into the EC lock than an actual EC list to.
That said I tried something similar years ago (when RUG was still the go to version) and it didn't really worked out. There's only so much space for interactive cards in the list between ramp spells, a high number of lands and Scapeshift itself.
What MUs is it actually improving? If you plan to ramp to 7 to effectively use E-Wit, why not just add in some surprise fatties your opponent doesn't expext, to stabilize and win?
E-Wit turns on all of your opponents removal that would otherwise be dead to get access to a loop that's super vulnerable to removal.
Haha shhhh let me try my dumb brew
On a serious note the deck is a tuned competitive variant of the older rug scapeshift lists and the only compromise is the 2 witness. Witness seems to me to be a decent "extra snapcaster" which also enables a game state where you just get to counter their best spell every single turn (or fog combat) in more grindy matchups. Not terrible and low opportunity cost. I'll see how it goes.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Modern: G Tron, Vannifar, Jund, Druid/Vizier combo, Humans, Eldrazi Stompy (Serum Powder), Amulet, Grishoalbrand, Breach Titan, Turns, Eternal Command, As Foretold Living End, Elves, Cheerios, RUG Scapeshift
I don't think I'd run daredevil main. It's too much of a dead card in some matchups where you need to be interacting.
It's pretty spicy as a sideboard option though. Seems nice against black decks and burn of course. Kinda cool in blue control matchups as well.
So I want to let you guys know I'm going to try something weird, a new variant of e-command.
Rug scapeshift with 2x witness. The idea is that the deck can get to 7 mana trivially, which is the amount required for executing the cryptic loop. I'm not going all-in on the soft lock but it's a fun way to fix certain matchups and provide another angle of attack once you've stabilised and drawn the game out to turn four or five. It also gives the deck a unique way to ensure hitting a scapeshift, rather than luck-sacking a topdeck the turn before you die to a lethal attack.
Moreover, the deck can afford to run the full playset of cryptics. That's nothing to sniff at.
I won't be running vial. I'm using the same lock but achieving it the "hard way" by ramping, with the joint wincon of cryptic-loop beats or the traditional scapeshift one-card combo.
So what's the downside? Well, in order to include this engine I have to find space for 2x eternal witness and also be prepared for the occasional slow hand which includes a witness instead of a piece of interaction. Apart from that there's no other opportunity cost. Rug is already a deck (although as we all know it's been replaced by straight RG titanshift over the last 12 months).
I'll feed back. I'm considering it an eternal command deck although in fairness it's also a scapeshift deck. I'll test it out on thuraday this week.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Modern: G Tron, Vannifar, Jund, Druid/Vizier combo, Humans, Eldrazi Stompy (Serum Powder), Amulet, Grishoalbrand, Breach Titan, Turns, Eternal Command, As Foretold Living End, Elves, Cheerios, RUG Scapeshift
Obviously a small sample size but I just came back from GP London playing side events. My opponents were as follows (I entered 9 events). I didn't play command but in the interests of seeing if it would have been OK, here's the "metagame" in the actual order I played them with wins and losses.
- Ad nauseam (w)
- Devoted druid coco (L)
- jund (w)
- Jeskai (L)
- Lantern (L)
- Storm (w) [switch decks]
- Lantern (L)
- Burn (L)
- (???) (L) [hate this 0-3 run switch Decks]
- Jund moon (w)
- Burn (w)
- Burn (w)
- Burn (w) [really getting into the swing of things here dispatching three burn decks in short order]
- 8-whack (w)
- Burn (w)
- Abzan (w)
- Jund (w) [at this point my winnings are enough to get me a revised Tundra and a booster box of something recent]
- Tron (w)
- Jeskai (w)
- Melira coco (w)
- Tron (w)
- Affinity (w)
- Affinity (w)
- RG ponza (L)
- Merfolk (w) [another booster box plus a load of historic boosters]
So let's see.... If I'd been playing command I think I'd have struggled against that metagame.
As it was, my super deep winning streak was at the helm of RG tron. Turns out it's great against burn. Who knew.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Modern: G Tron, Vannifar, Jund, Druid/Vizier combo, Humans, Eldrazi Stompy (Serum Powder), Amulet, Grishoalbrand, Breach Titan, Turns, Eternal Command, As Foretold Living End, Elves, Cheerios, RUG Scapeshift
Thanks for the answer ! I'll definitely follow your advices
For the record I think hostage taker is a good reason to try black for this deck. For testing purposes you could start with 2 copies to draw it more often and get a decent feel for how the card works. It's a good idea to compare the card to the only other four drop that we usually consider running (huntmaster of the fells). How worthwhile is ticking vial up to four? Do you ever actually want to? It's tough because our deck runs an intentionally low land count and relies on spells like serum visions, remand and electrolyze to filter into more lands
Maybe consider running 1x opt to have a 5th cantrip. Scrying excess vials to the bottom is always a decent option.
There are no definite correct answers here, I can only give general advice and it's up to you to find a groove and a build that works. Bear in mind though that a low-curve and early interaction is essential to this deck.
Actually if I had any advice for your build I'd say maybe pivot more into black and run fatal push instead of path to exile.
Also 1 or 2x collective brutality is probably a great option, it's so versatile (maybe sideboard, maybe 1 maindeck? Experiment!) White is great for spell queller and sideboard options, but fatal push is a better early interaction spell than path, because it doesn't ramp your opponent. We have the late-game covered, so you should worry about the early game and beating decks like affinity, infect, burn, merfolk and so on.
Hope that helps. Ask questions if you have any! It's great that you're testing these colours because there's some really strong options. Have fun most of all
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Modern: G Tron, Vannifar, Jund, Druid/Vizier combo, Humans, Eldrazi Stompy (Serum Powder), Amulet, Grishoalbrand, Breach Titan, Turns, Eternal Command, As Foretold Living End, Elves, Cheerios, RUG Scapeshift
Hey everyone, I threw a 4c Eternal Command list one week ago and tested it a bit, and I really wanted to know your opinion.
The mana base seems a bit clunky but actually worked fine for me... I'm not sure about the 2 abrupt decay , maybe it requires too much black mana.
Also, if you have some suggestions for the sideboardlet me know, for the moment I was thinking about lingering souls, engineered explosives, spreading seas, dispel and natural state.
Thanks
I'd say your curve is too high. You can get away with quite a lot with a turn 1 vial, but without that piece you're scuppered, especially as your one decent removal spell ramps your opponent into their combo or more threats.
I'd suggest giving it a re-think. At the moment you are overloaded on three drops and I would never run more than one 4-drop maindeck unless I had a good reason. Hostage taker is great but not worth it for this kind of build. I could see running it in a more 'normal' lower curve build.
Certainly, you'll want to drop the pulse, 1x decay, some number of queller and probably put reflector mage as one copy rather than two. You probably can't afford to run clique here either do drop that. You want an ideal package of about 15 creatures maindeck.
In the slots you free up (about 7 by my count) you want:
1x extra land (this deck always has a greedy manabase but I'd say 21 is far more acceptable than 20)
1-2x spell snare
1x spell pierce
1x extra remand
1x mana leak
1x whatever one mana interaction spell you fancy
You have to keep your curve low to allow you to use snapcaster mage effectively and interact against quick decks. If you aren't hitting your land drops, snapcaster does nothing. Like trying to flash back pulse is just murder haha.
It's tempting with this deck to overload on all the powerful effects at three mana but it's too easy to go too far down this route and end up with a top-heavy mess that loses before it can 'get there' to decks like affinity and burn.
Good luck!
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Modern: G Tron, Vannifar, Jund, Druid/Vizier combo, Humans, Eldrazi Stompy (Serum Powder), Amulet, Grishoalbrand, Breach Titan, Turns, Eternal Command, As Foretold Living End, Elves, Cheerios, RUG Scapeshift
The first time I saw hostage taker my mind went to this deck. Black is such a hard colour to include though because as you say, the discard isn't at its most effective here. Willing to try it out though because even as a 1-of or 2-of, hostage taker could be great.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Modern: G Tron, Vannifar, Jund, Druid/Vizier combo, Humans, Eldrazi Stompy (Serum Powder), Amulet, Grishoalbrand, Breach Titan, Turns, Eternal Command, As Foretold Living End, Elves, Cheerios, RUG Scapeshift
I had a bit of a breakthrough with this deck this week. Still needs testing but here's the general idea;
Run four maindeck 1-mana counterspells in 2x spell snare, 1x pierce and 1x dispel.
Also the flex 15th creature that's often a huntmaster or similar, I am running 1x grim lavamancer.
Took this approach after playing UR 'twinless twin' for a while online & it keyed me into the importance of turn 1 interaction if you're on the draw, and also the ability to protect your 'combo' or threats in the mid-game (or just counter an ad nauseam or coco or bolt etc)
Lavamancer is tech at the moment. Beats a lot of decks by himself but also can render your bolts able to take down a tasigur or something.
Running 4 serum visions and 2 opt.
1 roast maindeck and I'm still playing around with 1x tarfire although this is purely flex and could be vapor snag or something. Tarfire and goyf are amazing tech.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Modern: G Tron, Vannifar, Jund, Druid/Vizier combo, Humans, Eldrazi Stompy (Serum Powder), Amulet, Grishoalbrand, Breach Titan, Turns, Eternal Command, As Foretold Living End, Elves, Cheerios, RUG Scapeshift
I had a bit of a breakthrough with this deck this week. Still needs testing but here's the general idea;
Run four maindeck 1-mana counterspells in 2x spell snare, 1x pierce and 1x dispel.
Also the flex 15th creature that's often a huntmaster or similar, I am running 1x grim lavamancer.
Took this approach after playing UR 'twinless twin' for a while online & it keyed me into the importance of turn 1 interaction if you're on the draw, and also the ability to protect your 'combo' or threats in the mid-game (or just counter an ad nauseam or coco or bolt etc)
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Modern: G Tron, Vannifar, Jund, Druid/Vizier combo, Humans, Eldrazi Stompy (Serum Powder), Amulet, Grishoalbrand, Breach Titan, Turns, Eternal Command, As Foretold Living End, Elves, Cheerios, RUG Scapeshift
Re; people testing grow creatures. Is the format really in a place where something like quirion dryad can work?
I'd be over the moon if this was the case, but I'm not entirely convinced. Good in some matchups, I can imagine. Bad against the fatal push decks though for sure.
If you're hurting for a 2 drop that plays into the plan of the deck, maybe it's a spicy one-of.
I've personally been playing 1x Ninja of the Deep Hours
It's been working very well. Often you'll be able to swing in with a witness or snappy and "buy it back" with ninja, as well as draw a card. It opens up some rather sneaky lines of play like bouncing back witness, vialling in witness, getting back spell pierce, pierce their removal. Stuff like that.
It might be relevant, but from past experience, if you're running Opt you tend to want to run more cheap counterspells, so you can opt into them in your opponent's turn when you've got 2+ mana.
Just mentioning this because someone (I just glanced, can't remember who) mentioned dropping some of them.
Also how insanely good is opting into a witness EoT, vialling it in and getting back something powerful then untapping with all the answers. Very nice.
Agree that we still need sorceries in the deck for tarmogoyf. Maybe 3 visions, 1 traverse?
I'm running 1x tarfire and will probably keep it in the deck. As a one-of it's been instrumental in providing powerful surprise blocks and also just happens to work well against coco, affinity, d&t, elves, merfolk and so on. Haven't ever felt like the spell outstayed its welcome and it makes goyf nice and beefy at instant speed.
I just mean when looking for slots.
Its possible we want to be some 8 cantrip, low to the ground deck.
Maybe siren turns out to be super good, and we want several.
Maybe that means we cut a lot of the extra creatures (cutting cliques, for example) or shaving down on countermagic, or whatever.
I agree for sure. I'm not saying we should all just go ham on janky nonsense, however I am suggesting that a slight change to the balance of cards/numbers in the deck to accommodate potential powerful new tools is a good thing to think about.
I'm very conscious that over the years, the deck has become refined and everyone has kind of settled on 15 creatures and 20 (or 21) spells, plus vial. I can see those numbers more or less staying firm, but they could be tweaked slightly and the specific spells tweaked themselves.
Oh and holy mother of dog, Opt is so totally amazing for this deck. Instant way to dig to vial-targets? Ughhhjjjjjjjhhhghhhdjffjfjdhsjsjd it's so good
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Modern: G Tron, Vannifar, Jund, Druid/Vizier combo, Humans, Eldrazi Stompy (Serum Powder), Amulet, Grishoalbrand, Breach Titan, Turns, Eternal Command, As Foretold Living End, Elves, Cheerios, RUG Scapeshift
It could possibly replace one of the two vendilion cliques I'm running, and maybe a... Hmm maybe a remand or something. Not sure.
Other question, I'm looking at the most recent list on my phone from a while back... I assume I wasn't smoking something at the time, but I clearly decided that 20 lands was somehow viable. What are you guys running? I thought 21 was the standard but I can see for some reason I've dropped one and I can't figure out why.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Modern: G Tron, Vannifar, Jund, Druid/Vizier combo, Humans, Eldrazi Stompy (Serum Powder), Amulet, Grishoalbrand, Breach Titan, Turns, Eternal Command, As Foretold Living End, Elves, Cheerios, RUG Scapeshift
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Weird? I'm not so sure. The one thing that lets me down when I play this deck is a relative lack of card advantage or velocity. Mana, truth be told can be an issue at times but that's nothing unusual for modern.
I'll probably run three Cryptics and three scavenging ooze, set of goyf, plus a bunch of the usual suspects. Fatal push is straightforward, one abrupt decay, two assassin's trophy. After that I'll tweak, with an aim to keep the mana curve as low as possible.
I tried this a couple of years ago and it became my default list for quite some time. I ran four colours (tiny red splash for bolt in the main and ancient grudge in the side) so this brings me to another idea.
Has anyone tried running death's shadow in this deck? I mean if we're taking a bunch of damage from our lands, maybe it's a possibility? We could sub our counterspells for discard (save for the important Cryptic) and it'd make the deck more of a combo midrange deck?
I don't have any experience to back this up, its just a hunch.
Meddling mage, deputy of detentions, spell queller, reflector mage are the ones that stick out to me the most but also:
Knight of the reliquary, Knight of autumn, kataki war's wage, selfless spirit, eidolon of rhetoric, mirran crusader
The hits are significant. Not all of those cards are super relevant all the time but I see an angle here for the deck to pivot around these powerful hatebear-style creatures, while still having the combo as a backup for the long game and against opposing creature strategies.
Any thoughts?
It's also another angle to attack from and the -1 on Jace can actually enable some sweet vial lines. That's niche but relevant.
Not saying it's the new hotness but as a one or two-of in here I think it's decent. Certainly would have a useful function.
What's more interesting is how positioned this deck will be going forward. More kolaghan's commands floating about doesn't seem great but hey. Could be decent?
Haha shhhh let me try my dumb brew
On a serious note the deck is a tuned competitive variant of the older rug scapeshift lists and the only compromise is the 2 witness. Witness seems to me to be a decent "extra snapcaster" which also enables a game state where you just get to counter their best spell every single turn (or fog combat) in more grindy matchups. Not terrible and low opportunity cost. I'll see how it goes.
It's pretty spicy as a sideboard option though. Seems nice against black decks and burn of course. Kinda cool in blue control matchups as well.
So I want to let you guys know I'm going to try something weird, a new variant of e-command.
Rug scapeshift with 2x witness. The idea is that the deck can get to 7 mana trivially, which is the amount required for executing the cryptic loop. I'm not going all-in on the soft lock but it's a fun way to fix certain matchups and provide another angle of attack once you've stabilised and drawn the game out to turn four or five. It also gives the deck a unique way to ensure hitting a scapeshift, rather than luck-sacking a topdeck the turn before you die to a lethal attack.
Moreover, the deck can afford to run the full playset of cryptics. That's nothing to sniff at.
I won't be running vial. I'm using the same lock but achieving it the "hard way" by ramping, with the joint wincon of cryptic-loop beats or the traditional scapeshift one-card combo.
So what's the downside? Well, in order to include this engine I have to find space for 2x eternal witness and also be prepared for the occasional slow hand which includes a witness instead of a piece of interaction. Apart from that there's no other opportunity cost. Rug is already a deck (although as we all know it's been replaced by straight RG titanshift over the last 12 months).
I'll feed back. I'm considering it an eternal command deck although in fairness it's also a scapeshift deck. I'll test it out on thuraday this week.
- Ad nauseam (w)
- Devoted druid coco (L)
- jund (w)
- Jeskai (L)
- Lantern (L)
- Storm (w) [switch decks]
- Lantern (L)
- Burn (L)
- (???) (L) [hate this 0-3 run switch Decks]
- Jund moon (w)
- Burn (w)
- Burn (w)
- Burn (w) [really getting into the swing of things here dispatching three burn decks in short order]
- 8-whack (w)
- Burn (w)
- Abzan (w)
- Jund (w) [at this point my winnings are enough to get me a revised Tundra and a booster box of something recent]
- Tron (w)
- Jeskai (w)
- Melira coco (w)
- Tron (w)
- Affinity (w)
- Affinity (w)
- RG ponza (L)
- Merfolk (w) [another booster box plus a load of historic boosters]
So let's see.... If I'd been playing command I think I'd have struggled against that metagame.
As it was, my super deep winning streak was at the helm of RG tron. Turns out it's great against burn. Who knew.
For the record I think hostage taker is a good reason to try black for this deck. For testing purposes you could start with 2 copies to draw it more often and get a decent feel for how the card works. It's a good idea to compare the card to the only other four drop that we usually consider running (huntmaster of the fells). How worthwhile is ticking vial up to four? Do you ever actually want to? It's tough because our deck runs an intentionally low land count and relies on spells like serum visions, remand and electrolyze to filter into more lands
Maybe consider running 1x opt to have a 5th cantrip. Scrying excess vials to the bottom is always a decent option.
There are no definite correct answers here, I can only give general advice and it's up to you to find a groove and a build that works. Bear in mind though that a low-curve and early interaction is essential to this deck.
Actually if I had any advice for your build I'd say maybe pivot more into black and run fatal push instead of path to exile.
Also 1 or 2x collective brutality is probably a great option, it's so versatile (maybe sideboard, maybe 1 maindeck? Experiment!) White is great for spell queller and sideboard options, but fatal push is a better early interaction spell than path, because it doesn't ramp your opponent. We have the late-game covered, so you should worry about the early game and beating decks like affinity, infect, burn, merfolk and so on.
Hope that helps. Ask questions if you have any! It's great that you're testing these colours because there's some really strong options. Have fun most of all
I'd say your curve is too high. You can get away with quite a lot with a turn 1 vial, but without that piece you're scuppered, especially as your one decent removal spell ramps your opponent into their combo or more threats.
I'd suggest giving it a re-think. At the moment you are overloaded on three drops and I would never run more than one 4-drop maindeck unless I had a good reason. Hostage taker is great but not worth it for this kind of build. I could see running it in a more 'normal' lower curve build.
Certainly, you'll want to drop the pulse, 1x decay, some number of queller and probably put reflector mage as one copy rather than two. You probably can't afford to run clique here either do drop that. You want an ideal package of about 15 creatures maindeck.
In the slots you free up (about 7 by my count) you want:
1x extra land (this deck always has a greedy manabase but I'd say 21 is far more acceptable than 20)
1-2x spell snare
1x spell pierce
1x extra remand
1x mana leak
1x whatever one mana interaction spell you fancy
You have to keep your curve low to allow you to use snapcaster mage effectively and interact against quick decks. If you aren't hitting your land drops, snapcaster does nothing. Like trying to flash back pulse is just murder haha.
It's tempting with this deck to overload on all the powerful effects at three mana but it's too easy to go too far down this route and end up with a top-heavy mess that loses before it can 'get there' to decks like affinity and burn.
Good luck!
Run four maindeck 1-mana counterspells in 2x spell snare, 1x pierce and 1x dispel.
Also the flex 15th creature that's often a huntmaster or similar, I am running 1x grim lavamancer.
Took this approach after playing UR 'twinless twin' for a while online & it keyed me into the importance of turn 1 interaction if you're on the draw, and also the ability to protect your 'combo' or threats in the mid-game (or just counter an ad nauseam or coco or bolt etc)
Lavamancer is tech at the moment. Beats a lot of decks by himself but also can render your bolts able to take down a tasigur or something.
Running 4 serum visions and 2 opt.
1 roast maindeck and I'm still playing around with 1x tarfire although this is purely flex and could be vapor snag or something. Tarfire and goyf are amazing tech.
Run four maindeck 1-mana counterspells in 2x spell snare, 1x pierce and 1x dispel.
Also the flex 15th creature that's often a huntmaster or similar, I am running 1x grim lavamancer.
Took this approach after playing UR 'twinless twin' for a while online & it keyed me into the importance of turn 1 interaction if you're on the draw, and also the ability to protect your 'combo' or threats in the mid-game (or just counter an ad nauseam or coco or bolt etc)
I'd be over the moon if this was the case, but I'm not entirely convinced. Good in some matchups, I can imagine. Bad against the fatal push decks though for sure.
If you're hurting for a 2 drop that plays into the plan of the deck, maybe it's a spicy one-of.
I've personally been playing 1x Ninja of the Deep Hours
It's been working very well. Often you'll be able to swing in with a witness or snappy and "buy it back" with ninja, as well as draw a card. It opens up some rather sneaky lines of play like bouncing back witness, vialling in witness, getting back spell pierce, pierce their removal. Stuff like that.
Just mentioning this because someone (I just glanced, can't remember who) mentioned dropping some of them.
Also how insanely good is opting into a witness EoT, vialling it in and getting back something powerful then untapping with all the answers. Very nice.
Agree that we still need sorceries in the deck for tarmogoyf. Maybe 3 visions, 1 traverse?
I'm running 1x tarfire and will probably keep it in the deck. As a one-of it's been instrumental in providing powerful surprise blocks and also just happens to work well against coco, affinity, d&t, elves, merfolk and so on. Haven't ever felt like the spell outstayed its welcome and it makes goyf nice and beefy at instant speed.
I agree for sure. I'm not saying we should all just go ham on janky nonsense, however I am suggesting that a slight change to the balance of cards/numbers in the deck to accommodate potential powerful new tools is a good thing to think about.
I'm very conscious that over the years, the deck has become refined and everyone has kind of settled on 15 creatures and 20 (or 21) spells, plus vial. I can see those numbers more or less staying firm, but they could be tweaked slightly and the specific spells tweaked themselves.
Oh and holy mother of dog, Opt is so totally amazing for this deck. Instant way to dig to vial-targets? Ughhhjjjjjjjhhhghhhdjffjfjdhsjsjd it's so good
Other question, I'm looking at the most recent list on my phone from a while back... I assume I wasn't smoking something at the time, but I clearly decided that 20 lands was somehow viable. What are you guys running? I thought 21 was the standard but I can see for some reason I've dropped one and I can't figure out why.