i say victimize That’s the bigger commander staple
you're probably right since reprinting that card over any number of other reanimate spells that could use (necromancy, dance of the dead) it is pretty uninspired making it par for the course when it comes to reprints.
"Ghost of Agrus Kos" makes perfect sense and fits the clue. It doesn't need to have a title from a previous card, just the name of a legendary creature previously featured on a card.
Yup, too many hyperfixated on the notion it has to be ghost of and then exact existing legendaru card name, but it doesnt at all
My money is on agrus kos too
Hes also the most obvious option from the story. No other existing legendary card has existed in the story as a ghost after death so it really doesnt make sense for it to be anyone else
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
you're probably right since reprinting that card over any number of other reanimate spells that could use (necromancy, dance of the dead) it is pretty uninspired making it par for the course when it comes to reprints.
why do people keep pushing this idea that the ghost of card has to be the ghost of a... ghost?
i just don't understand it. karlov is already a ghost, does it make sense to have a ghost of karlov if he's already a ghost?
Yup, too many hyperfixated on the notion it has to be ghost of and then exact existing legendaru card name, but it doesnt at all
My money is on agrus kos too
Hes also the most obvious option from the story. No other existing legendary card has existed in the story as a ghost after death so it really doesnt make sense for it to be anyone else