2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • 2

    posted a message on
    Comment Hidden
    Link Removed
  • 1

    posted a message on
    Comment Hidden
    Link Removed
  • 1

    posted a message on Exclusive grand prix land promos
    Quote from Velrun »
    Quote from Dom4419 »
    There's also APAC, euro and arena lands. The MPS lands have been done for many years that are plane specific.


    Is there a webpage where all Basic lands in the history if the game are displayed? (Someone should make that)

    As far as I know neither www.magiccards.info nor www.scryfall.com has all the lands. Once again correct me if I am wrong.


    https://sites.google.com/site/mtgbasics/
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on The State of Modern Thread (B&R 16/04/2018)
    Quote from ktkenshinx »

    Quote from NRWGN »

    What you should be complaining about is why are cards on the same power level as those decks banned unfairly.

    I am one of the most, perhaps the most, vocal critic of ban mania and its associated mentality on this forum. It's bad for the format, it's lazy, it's uncritical, it rarely aligns with Wizards' thinking, and it has been flat out wrong for 1.5 years now. In this particular case, however, there is an actual argument to be made for a Stirrings ban OR a Preordain unban. These cards have been a longtime target of ban/unban talk in this thread but, until recently, it has not really been a legitimate target.

    So we agree on an unban at least and I think we're mostly on the same page. I still don't believe any deck with Stirrings is near being broken or dominant, and just listing how many decks it beefs up certain archetypes that would be worse off (if not unplayable) if it was banned makes me continue to think that more bans aren't the answer. This is still banmania.

    Quote from Tasighoul »
    Quote from NRWGN »
    Every time a deck top 8s, you guys cry for a ban.
    That's a creative narrative, considering that various posters have discussed an Ancient Stirrings ban well before GP Vegas.

    Various posters and pro players also loathed the idea of a Jace unban for years. Posters can be wrong, the length of time they make their argument doesn't give it merit. There is not one deck that Ancient Stirrings currently slots into that is oppressive or bad for the format.
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • 1

    posted a message on The State of Modern Thread (B&R 16/04/2018)
    Quote from ktkenshinx »
    I know there is some anti-Human sentiment in here but let's try and stay honest with our criticisms of the deck. Humans winning on T3 is a particularly disingenuous allegation. Here's the line that was identified:

    T1: Land, Champion (1/1)
    T2: Land, Champion (2/2 - 1/1), Champion (3/3 - 2/2 - 1/1), swing with Champion (Opp 17)
    T3: Land, Lieutenant (5/5 - 4/4 - 3/3), Hierarch/Champion (6/6 - 5/5 - 4/4), swing with all (Opp 2)

    So this T3 "kill" requires 3 Champion, 3 Lands, a Lieutenant, and then either the remaining 4th Champion or Hierarch. So that's 9 or 10 cards seen to draw 8 specific cards. This is an EXTREMELY unlikely draw. It's also the only draw in the entire deck that gets there. Oh, and it also doesn't actually kill the opponent if they didn't play an untapped shock or didn't fetch twice, so it's not even a goldfish T3 kill. I'm calling shenanigans on this entire accusation of Humans being able to kill T3. There may be legitimate issues with Humans, but it's ability to kill on T3 is not one of those issues.

    Speaking of which, Humans is exactly the kind of close-to 50/50+ deck that pros want to play in Modern. It's also the kind of 50/50+ policing deck many of this thread's most vocal Modern critics always want to play. It has a proactive game plan, a matchup spectrum right around 50/50, inherent disruption that hits multiple decks, a few flex slots to tailor to metagames, and is relatively easy to pick up but also relatively hard to play "perfectly" due to stuff like Mage and appropriate Vial usage. This is the exact same kind of deck many of the pro-blue mages want. Except it's not blue combo/control, it's a type of rainbow aggro. It's basically doing what Twin would be doing in Modern, just not in Twin colors or with a Twin theme. And for some people, that's unacceptable and "broken." So if people don't want Humans around because of its impact on the metagame, that's fine, but then let's not also argue for a policing blue deck that has the same effect. Humans IS the current policing deck of Modern. If you don't like policing decks, then be genuine and don't like ALL of them, not just Humans because of its aggro nature. If you do purport to like policing decks, great! But don't apply a double standard to Humans when you would be happy with a blue deck (or UR combo/control deck) in its place.


    I think the problem people have is that when the police deck is aggro, it's unfair because now you have a deck that is consistently good against combo, which naturally should pray on aggro, while also still being good or at least fair against control, and also simultaneously be the best aggro deck against other aggro decks. It's just a weird wedge to put a police deck because its not only insanely versatile, but the conditions for it to be made better (human subtype creatures) are also assumed overwhelmingly abundant in the future.

    Just to clarify, before some accuses me of otherwise, I don't play Humans and I think the deck is fine/not ban worthy (and I also could care less about Twin), but I am not going to go as far as pretending like other peoples criticisms aren't valid here.
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • 4

    posted a message on [M19] Commons leaked in Dominaria Packaged Product
    No confirmation yet on others but they're probably out there. It looks like an entire common sheet possibly. Let the spoiler season begin.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on Modern URx Wizards (Wizard Tribal)
    You guys are all forgetting about Champion of Wits and most importantly Sage of Fables. Those cards, with instants/sorceries and Naban, Dean of Iteration/Adeliz, the Cinder Wind are what will give you the card advantage to be a different type of deck. I could be wrong, and everyone can quote me on release if I am, but I don't think we're trying to be Merfolk with Prowess instead of lords.
    Posted in: Deck Creation (Modern)
  • 1

    posted a message on help me finish this liliana combo
    Bitter Ordeal
    Posted in: Modern
  • 5

    posted a message on Mini Announcment day
    Imagine that Jace Signature Spellbook containing Jace, the Mind Sculptor and turning him from the Wallet Sculpter to the Peoples Sculpture. Crash the market. Eliminate the bourgeoisie.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on [Primer] RG Ponza / Modern Land Destruction
    @Joban: That's a 63-card deck, really throwing me off there.

    It's sweet mill mainboard tech.
    Posted in: Midrange
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.