2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on [Primer] Bant Company
    What do you all think of the Human Bant Company decks that have been doing well on MODO?
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on Current Modern Banlist Discussion (4/4/2016 - Eye of Ugin banned, Ancestral Vision/Sword of the Meek unbanned)
    Quote from ktkenshinx »
    Quote from idSurge »
    White does still need something. I am also not convinced blue needs anything. Twin is red. :p

    I am not convinced anything needs anything until we get both the Grand Prix results from this weekend, and then we get results from the August triple GP weekend. If those five Grand Prix cannot produce a viable Tier 1 blue strategy, or if they all see Jund sucking, then we can return to our discussion of unbanning JTMS/insert-blue-card-here and unbanning BBE. Similarly, if some other Modern deck is a problem and dominates in those five events (winning them all, sending 3 players to the T8 of all of them, etc.) then we can talk about metagame diversity bans. Or, if a turn four violator consistently performs even if it isn't making Tier 1, then we can talk about banning that too.

    For now, we don't have enough information to claim anything needs to be banned or unbanned. We still have people believing RG Tron is dead when it just got 2nd at the SCG Open and got 10th at the same event. This kind of uncertainty needs to settle before we can figure out what is fair and what is not, as well as what needs help and what needs to be left alone.


    How does this weekend affect the Modern meta? Is there a big event at the GPs?
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • posted a message on No more Modern PTs: Modern guidelines revealed
    Quote from Sirius_B »
    Legacy is doing better at my local level because it doesn't require you build a Tier 1 deck to compete and stores have altogether removed all Modern support save for a single FNM, while Legacy has a community driven bi-montly League. Modern had a league too but the organizers dropped it because "that ***** is casual now".

    Modern players didn't want their format to be casual, we were browbeat into chosing between losing our time and money investments through bans, or shuting the **** up and letting the pros have one more big event to play babby magic at.


    This doesn't make any sense. I haven't met a single pro team dedicated to modern anyway but a bunch of casual players suddenly drop the format because it won't be at an event they'll never go to?
    Posted in: Modern
  • posted a message on Is Bant Company tier 0?
    Quote from Celestrael »
    Bant CoCo barely made the top 8 (came in 7th), so I don't think it's as overpowered as people are making it out to be. I think the results we saw at the SCG are going to be limited to there. A lot of people jumped on Bant and Mono White Humans and I think they hopped on the wrong bus. A good control deck shuts both of them down and we're seeing 3 out of the top 4 being control decks. With Control ascending, you're going to see a lot of shifting in the meta. Control is the great equalizer. ;-)


    This line of thinking is extremely flawed. Here is a breakdown of the decks that got at least 7 wins at the PT.
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on No more Modern PTs: Modern guidelines revealed
    I think this change is fantastic along with a lot of policy outlines. This is exactly what most of us wanted during Eldrazi Winter.
    Posted in: Modern
  • posted a message on No more Modern PTs: Modern guidelines revealed
    From AF

    No Modern PTs going forward

    Small banlist

    Less non-interactive decks

    Be at a power level so some new cards can break in
    Posted in: Modern
  • posted a message on Is Bant Company tier 0?
    Quote from jeremylin »

    I have seen them scoop immediatly when somebody played hallowed moonlight in response to their CoCo,


    ok that's just silly if you scoop to a Solemn Warning.


    Solemn Warning?
    They get 0 creatures instead of 2 and you draw a card.
    They cannot win after that, unless they were already miles ahead.


    You mean like when they scoop to CoCo getting countered? It's essentially the same thing.
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on IF Bant Company dominates Pro tour as it did with the last events.....ban reflector mage?
    Quote from pyro1934 »
    Bant CoCo isnt even NEAR the only deck to play. My LGS had a pretty big turnout for its Wednesday Night Standard and of 34 people, only 3 Bant CoCo decks. Only 1 Top 8'd. There is plenty of hate for it, if you dont like it, play the hate, if you dont like the hate, develop a new hate.

    There are TONS of cards and deck combos that can beat CoCo, use them, find them, build them. Just because the deck you want to play gets hosed by CoCo doesnt mean it needs a ban.


    I sincerely doubt what happens at an LGS means anything. We should see how the Leagues and PT shape up to really see if the format needs fixing. Bant Company is doing well on day 1 with gigantic numbers, but we are really far from the threshold of banning.
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on Current Modern Banlist Discussion (4/4/2016 - Eye of Ugin banned, Ancestral Vision/Sword of the Meek unbanned)
    Quote from Spsiegel1987 »
    So been playing a lot of Junk, Jund and Titanshift on MTGO.


    Seriously, **** this AV unban. All it's done is help hurt non AV fair decks. I'm finding players keep sloppy hands with AV, and aggro and combo decks slip right through it. Jund? God no. I don't even like Liliana of the Veil in the matchups anymore. Jund and Junk are grindy decks, it's not uncommon whatsoever to be able to cast AV twice in a game with real issues. The card advantage is unreal now, to the point where I almost don't want to keep Lillies in games 2 and 3 anymore.

    I'm sure someone's going to go, "HERP DERP, DISCARD THEIR AV TURN 1 AND THEN LAND GOYF! IT'S TOO EASY" No, it's not. Seriously, Liliana is awful as I go hellbent on myself and my opponent draws 3 cards and then chains AV's together as I just sit there with Lilly watching her get crapped on. I'm honestly not sure how Jund is reaching these top 8s, my assumption is that these aggro and combo decks are crapping on the AV decks and those particular Jund players are dodging the decks, because I honestly feel anything running AV has a 65-35 matchup against Jund now.

    Definitely frustrated that all AV has done is hurt fair decks, it hasn't solved the issue of combo or aggro whatsoever, and some people like Bill called that way long ago



    So play different cards? It's not like black is lacking in good draw 3s is it? Or that Lingering Souls or Rhinos are pretty powerful on their own.
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • posted a message on Current Modern Banlist Discussion (4/4/2016 - Eye of Ugin banned, Ancestral Vision/Sword of the Meek unbanned)
    Quote from Teysa_Karlov »
    Quote from Godec »
    Quote from ktkenshinx »
    Quote from Godec »

    Ummm, isn't that what he said it would be though? Just his thoughts on what healthy should be?

    Authors can write opinion pieces while also drawing on external evidence. The best op-eds in non-Magic content do just that. That should be just as true for Magic content producers, especially for premium SCG writers and pros. He doesn't need to go nuts with it. Just needs to cite any of the abundant sources which play into his arguments.

    I'll also add that we just had a banlist update about two weeks ago. Do we really need this kind of article 15 days later?


    I disagree. He cites enough info to make a case for why he thinks Goryo, SSG, and Opal would be on the block, and certainly more than what WotC says for some bans and unbans. I like pieces where I can see the unfiltered thoughts and intuitions from some of the best players in the game, especially in a dead time when people are still thinking of bans and unbans. Your work's great, but I don't think everything needs to be like it at all.


    I think that when the pro is advocating for the unban of the second most powerful piece of equipment ever printed, the pro can safely be disregarded. Jitte is one of the most powerful cards in Legacy, and entirely warps the game around itself. Every game with Jitte becomes "Did you remove Jitte immediately or counter it? If not, you lose."

    For the Modern banlist, I would trust the unban of every other card except the affinity lands, Mental Misstep, Skullclamp and Glimpse of Nature before I would trust a Jitte unbanning.


    Jitte is indeed the most powerful equipment, but let's not get into hyperbole with "it's one of the most powerful cards in Legacy." SFM is nestled in tier 2 decks and Jitte isn't the end all be all it used to be. Still probably too strong for Modern, but getting thoughts on it in the format is interesting.
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • posted a message on Current Modern Banlist Discussion (4/4/2016 - Eye of Ugin banned, Ancestral Vision/Sword of the Meek unbanned)
    Quote from ktkenshinx »
    Quote from Godec »

    Ummm, isn't that what he said it would be though? Just his thoughts on what healthy should be?

    Authors can write opinion pieces while also drawing on external evidence. The best op-eds in non-Magic content do just that. That should be just as true for Magic content producers, especially for premium SCG writers and pros. He doesn't need to go nuts with it. Just needs to cite any of the abundant sources which play into his arguments.

    I'll also add that we just had a banlist update about two weeks ago. Do we really need this kind of article 15 days later?


    I disagree. He cites enough info to make a case for why he thinks Goryo, SSG, and Opal would be on the block, and certainly more than what WotC says for some bans and unbans. I like pieces where I can see the unfiltered thoughts and intuitions from some of the best players in the game, especially in a dead time when people are still thinking of bans and unbans. Your work's great, but I don't think everything needs to be like it at all.
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • posted a message on Current Modern Banlist Discussion (4/4/2016 - Eye of Ugin banned, Ancestral Vision/Sword of the Meek unbanned)
    Quote from ktkenshinx »
    Quote from xxhellfirexx3 »
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-dRhzvZGLg

    can someone tell me what cards ari lax has referred to? I dont have access to this

    Don't double-post. Use the Edit feature.

    Really not a fan of Lax's article. He separates cards into tiers of bannability and unbannability from most to least likely. Here are the tiers for bannings.

    Tier 1 Bans
    SSG
    Goryo's Vengeance or Griselbrand

    Tier 2 Bans
    Mox Opal
    Gitaxian Probe

    Tier 3 Bans
    Amulet of Vigor
    Become Immense
    Ancient Stirrings
    Spoils of the Vault
    Urza's Mine
    Blood Moon

    And here are the tiers for the unbans, starting with the most likely and ending with the ones we shouldn't even talk about.

    Tier 1 Unbans
    Jitte

    Tier 2 Unbans
    BBE
    Twin
    Bloom
    Artifact lands
    Punishing Fire

    Tier 3 Unbans (i.e. never going to happen)
    Ponder/Preordain
    Pod
    Cloudpost
    Dread Return
    GSZ
    JTMS
    SFM

    Overall, not one of Lax's stronger pieces. It's just a scattershot grab bag of opinions with basically no Wizards quotes, banlist decision citations, tournament data, or test results.


    Ummm, isn't that what he said it would be though? Just his thoughts on what healthy should be?
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • posted a message on Is Bant Company tier 0?
    I think we'll find out at the PT but it's put up dazzling numbers the past two weeks with multiple variants. Company+Mage+Recruiter and hyper efficient cards is an extremely strong formula for success.
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on Current Modern Banlist Discussion (4/4/2016 - Eye of Ugin banned, Ancestral Vision/Sword of the Meek unbanned)
    Watching coverage and reading some analysis it looks like Company decks might be a bigger player in the meta with less Tron. It has a its own robust combo, lots of resilience and plenty of disruption to deal with Thopter decks.
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • posted a message on Shadows Over Innistrad General Discussion
    I wonder if it means that his power was permanently diminished by creating Avacyn or if it was temporary? Nahiri's power post mending is also quite interesting.
    Posted in: Magic Storyline
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.