Quote from Luke71 »Why don't you test a rule that makes starting or not starting a real decision, and not just "I hope to win the roll so I can start"?
What would a rule like that look like, in your opinion?
1
Quote from Luke71 »Why don't you test a rule that makes starting or not starting a real decision, and not just "I hope to win the roll so I can start"?
2
2
8
8
2
1
2
4
Quote from Bearscape »
March 11th I'd still would like to see Faithless Looting get the hammer,
8
6
If they didn't advertise this set as being specifically for Modern, I'd be less soured. If this was like, "Rainbow Masters" or whatever, I wouldn't groan with every obvious commanderbait card, and cute references like Ponder Mage would actually be charming instead of just draft fodder for the pile. Eyeballing it I'm at a ~25 out of 93 cards that might be interesting for modern, which is absurdly high for any other product, but disappointing after the marketing.
Modern Horizons was our birthday party and now it turns out we have to share the presents with the Commander people.
1
1
Honestly if I ever get T1'd by Neoform one day and their wincon is OCEAN OF BEARS then all is forgiven
3
What ungodly all-encompassing magic card are you comparing Force of Negation to now that can stop all of that? Cause I need like 4 playsets
1
UW is always popular and is becoming a real force now, so having less dead cards in the main for the mirror is also a big plus.
2
**** yes.
We can stop the spoiler season now, between Sort of Will and Fact or Fiction I am satisfied.
4
1
1
Print cards until something breaks, then ban what breaks. Not preemptively.
3
I do think Batterskull would see play with SFM, but it'd just be a decent fair play. Even in the fair matchups you can do a lot more devastating things nowadays. I'm uncertain about the swords.