Quote from Tempest753 »
You’re not wrong, but I feel like almost everything in BG meets the criteria of immediately impacting the game state in a meaningful way, no?
Quote from xngchong »
So, I have a lot of doubts related whith the sideboard plan.
Quote from GolgariMage »Hello,
interested in the blueless decklist played by 2InTheBoard
Since you say you would remove the Blood Moon, what could be the bet option for this slot?
Quote from Piney_Tinecones »
As far as the edict card is concerned, that’s a good point about Shadow and “go-wide” strategies. They weren’t too excited about it on the Jund thread either it seemed, but that one I don’t understand as much. 'Lots of decks have lots of creatures, and giving the opponent a choice is bad'. Yeah, but it’s Jund. We’re one-for-oneing all their creatures as they put them down, mostly. The opponent’s side of the board really shouldn’t be that wide, if at all.
Quote from Luke71 »Why don't you test a rule that makes starting or not starting a real decision, and not just "I hope to win the roll so I can start"?
Quote from VidarThor »Quote from iSergiant »How about this?:
I think this can be good in a Traverse list. You hope to connect once to get something back ocne you have sett up a grind situasion.
Quote from iSergiant »How about this?:
Quote from MikePemulis »So if all the podcasts are right and Surgical isn't a good answer for Phoenix, and you're not worried about your Dredge matchup, do you just go zero grave hate and play a Rending Volley or two in your board?
Quote from idSurge »Or ban nothing, it wont fix things. See: KCI.