Hunt was the only scummy player and purposely targeted s_k day 1 basically guaranteeing he would lose, I don't know what OB did, and ISO claimed SK.
Proph's role was super stupid with Iso and s_k's role was incredibly OP, and beyond that the town relied on useless abilities. Hunt was the strongest "town" role.
The big issue in this game was *****ting on the fundamentals of game design. No consistent NK, swingy nights, and no scum coordination. Three neutrals vs a town with everything neutral is a town win.
If there are two scum, then voting Iso is a waste of time because if he isn't lying about his unlynchability it would take us to night and the end game.
Proph's role was super stupid with Iso and s_k's role was incredibly OP, and beyond that the town relied on useless abilities. Hunt was the strongest "town" role.
The big issue in this game was *****ting on the fundamentals of game design. No consistent NK, swingy nights, and no scum coordination. Three neutrals vs a town with everything neutral is a town win.
Hopefully BE2 gets swapped or mod killed soon.
I'm actually think lynching Hunt is the best option over a no lynch.
IMO it is Hunt BE2 or Seppel that even have a short at it and Hunt tops the list as most scummy.
2 - Seppel
3 - Me
4 - OB
5 - Proph
6
7 - KA
8 - g_d
9 - GJ
10 - s_k
J - Hunt
Q - Iso
K
vote Proph still need to test this.
2
3 - Me
4 - OB
5 - Proph
6
7 - KA
8 - g_d
9 - GJ
10 - s_k
J - Hunt
Q - Iso
K
Anyone want to fill in what's missing? I think it's just BF, Seppel, and BE2. I don't think BF claimed.
There are like 40 protective roles in the game, which is far more suspicious than the killing roles.
If there are two scum, then voting Iso is a waste of time because if he isn't lying about his unlynchability it would take us to night and the end game.