Quote from h0lydiva »Quote from cfusionpm »Quote from h0lydiva »I can't believe I just read 3 pages of people banging the Twin drum. This is pathological already.
Maybe if the ban, the justification, and the following year's worth of results weren't such colossal failures, we wouldn't be doing that.
Yeah I'm sure in your mind it makes perfect sense to be spamming some forum of a card game for a full year over some decision you didn't like.
On the one hand, I hear that the constant Twin discussion can be annoying. On the other hand, does anyone actually defend that Twin ban? Did it accomplish its stated goals in a satisfactory manner for players and Wizards? I really don't think so. Twin decks totally died (Kiki didn't replace them), URx decks really fell off the map, and the format got more linear. This really doesn't seem like it was Wizards' intention, so I struggle to defend the ban if we look at the last year.
1
Luckily i built Burn last week.... see you in hell Eidolon of the great reveal.
1
Ps: i dont play twin
1
1
1
Like Sheridans turn 4 article i think the only criteria that apllies to Amulet is the turn 4 rule. And like aaron says it doesnt count goldfish turn 3< kills if not real turn 3 kills (real means actual percentage based on online And paper games). As requested before none of us is actually aware of this data so we have to wait And see if DCI determines Amulet as an infractor of this rule.
Like i have said before, if it indeed breaks this rule, then it is prepared to leave our format,
If it doesnt then we have to coexist with it whether you hate losing to 20/18 titan or not.
PS: just to contextualize my post, i own the deck And i love playing it And dont
Bother losing against it even if it comes from turn 1 Hive mind Pact
1
Agree with the post
1
(all this coming from a Jund player)
2
1
1
No disrespect here, just my opinion.