2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • 1

    posted a message on Temporary 3/13/2017 banlist update discussion thread ("No Changes")
    That statement by Forsythe has a couple of reads for sure. I hope even if they don't explicity unban something, they adress our issues and thoughts so we can avoid wasting our time speculating.

    Especial thanks to @gkourou and @cfusionpm for reaching out to him. At least we know they hear the voice of the people that plays their format almost exclusively.
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • 4

    posted a message on Temporary 3/13/2017 banlist update discussion thread ("No Changes")
    Jace is probably not too strong for Modern. However it is a midgrange(goodstuff) card by nature. If i had to bet my money on an outcome, it would be that Jace would be a reason to play Sultai Midrange. Thoughtseize it's still the best interaction spell in the format, Goyf the best efficient threat, Decay the best catch-all and Liliana of the Veil the best planeswalker. Counterspells still suck in Modern, whether they die in the late game or are just too narrow.

    That's why we shouldn't be cheering for WOTC to unban Jace if we want the 'Reactive' spectrum to catch up with the rest of the format. I just think that if banlist is the topic, Dig Through Time is a much better card for test. There are a plenty of reasons to belive that DTT would empower blue reactive decks more than anything else, and not break the format in a haf.

    Last but not least, Stoneforge Mystic doens't accomplish what we are trying to do. It fits into TWO Tier 1 strategies, and it isn't even a blue card, which leads into Mystic empowering a much shorter spectrum of blue decks as you take Sultai and Grixis out of the equation.

    In conclusion, we all know blue pretty much sucks in contrast to BG/x. I would leave the banlist untouched and bring the heat with future sets, including Amonkhet.

    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • 1

    posted a message on Article on Underrated Modern Competitive Decks
    Modern is definitely a format of Tier 2 decks. This is what is most interesting of this format. There are so many decks that can thrive at competitive level, you need to know in and outs of your deck and basical knowledge of other decks and you are in for a run.

    I've been thinking a lot about this too and i came up with this list:
    -Grixis Delver
    -Abzan Company
    -Ad Nauseam*
    -Lantern Control
    -Merfolk
    -UW Control
    -Valakut
    -Storm Gifts
    -Elves
    -Goryos Vengance
    -Hatebears Vial
    -Dredge
    -Knightfall

    This are all Tier 2 or less and are very much capable of winning a tournament just like a Tier 1. They have a lot of play in them. Nauseam and Lantern are a little bit more known because pro's already identified them as fine choices but nevertheless they are somewhat 'under the radar'.

    Good article!
    Posted in: Modern Community
  • 1

    posted a message on State of Modern Thread: bans, format health, reprints, new cards, and more!
    Said this a zillion times by now. Will keep saying it.

    The 'Blue Debate' is endless because frustrated blue players can't decide what is it they want fixed. They talk about Splinter Twin, Counterspell, Preordain, Jace, SFM, etc,etc. The issue here is that there are guys that clearly want Twin back no matter what. They really don't care about blue. They just want their overpowered super unfair combo-control deck again, and that's reasonable if you ask me. Every banned deck carries a lot of hurted players behind. Twin was an exceptional case because: 1)Not many people saw it comming(especially Twin players)
    2)Many people belived Twin was a backbone of the Modern format that once removed, the entire body would fall apart(again, pretty much all Twin players).

    The fact is that Twin will not come back no matter how factible may sound. It just doesn't fit R&D's agenda for the format. They don't want any deck being suppressed out of the metagame by one particular deck.(I know that it is an almost unachievable goal but still..).

    So, what it's best for Modern?. That the whole point right? Play the best format ever?.
    Do we think Modern needs a Top tier combo-control deck?. Draw-go maybe? Prison Control?.

    Prison is pretty much out of the question since it is the best deck in another format(Legacy Miracles). Draw-go once existed in a more grindy metagame(back when Pod and Twin were a thing).
    If you scratch the Combo, Draw-go and Prison elements for blue control, then you need bleu Midrange tools. Jace, Preordain, SFM+Preordain?, etc. Legacy doens't have Draw-go neither Combo-Control. It has Aggro-Control in Delver of Secrets, and Midrange in Esper,Sultai,Bant,etc. All of them good competitive decks.

    Having said this, i confirm my believe that Forsythe's tweet about Jace wasn't trivial. I think WOTC is more likely to pull the Jace trigger than anything else, in an attempt to balance BG and U/x. If that ends in Sultai best shard, then we got what we wish for. A playable, top tier blue control deck. It might not be on the reactive end but still it is a control deck.

    That's also why i don't see Counterspell variant happening anytime soon.

    If you want to play Combo-Control, you have Saheeli+Cat. It's not Twin but i think it might be what Abzan Coco is to Pod.
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • 3

    posted a message on State of Modern Thread: bans, format health, reprints, new cards, and more!
    Quote from idSurge »
    'toxic' wtf does that even mean.


    You can ask me to clarify if you want me to.

    Toxic means: Oppresive of archetypes, not being able to tap out on T3 and on, being scared constantly of being comboed out or Mooned out of the game, having 50% matchups against all meta decks incuding some ridiculous lopsided matchups like Affinity, Tron and Valakut.

    There could be more reasons too.
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • 1

    posted a message on State of Modern Thread: bans, format health, reprints, new cards, and more!
    Too fast to pull any triggers. The format is in my opinion the best it has ever been since 2013. The 'deck to beat' has much dificulty handling control decks(abzan for path and grixis for push and tasigur).
    Wotc just reprinted a lot of staples for us and new players.

    We are at the point where we need to give blue just a little push so we can stop crying about splinter twin and forget all that crap.
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • 1

    posted a message on State of Modern Thread: bans, format health, reprints, new cards, and more!
    Quote from /gkorou »
    I basically think both are OK. Modern needs having proactive threats because of the massive card pool and because of the first legal Modern sets that there exist (7th-8th-9th etc) even if it's in a control or a midrange deck and that's what the new Death's Shadow deck is doing. That's what Splinter Twin was doing as well.


    I think you are right here. The cardpool is so massive that you basically need to have something in your deck that, at one point, it will ingnore what the other person is doing(or locking them out) and finish the game. There are no cards that respond every card in the format with the exception of Thoughtseize which is a fantastic card.

    I wonder if Jace could bring something new to the table. A mix between a lock, and card advantage pillar and a win-condition.
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • 1

    posted a message on State of Modern Thread: bans, format health, reprints, new cards, and more!
    As Corey Burkhart says, don't unban Jace. It's a road only Jace lovers will like. It doens't solve any problem and far worse it makes other cards unplayable.

    Now, an unban of Preordain/DTT AND Jace i can get behind if your goal is to make reactive blue a thing.

    The conversation which involves pros like Sam Black and Burkhart can be found on Aaron Forsythes Twitter.
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • 1

    posted a message on State of Modern Thread: bans, format health, reprints, new cards, and more!
    After this two GP's we can conclude that no player is brave/crazy enough to show up with a Blue reactive deck. This leaves us with some questions and matters that i will list in no particular order:

    1)The Twin ban was supposed to diversify control decks and let them exist without the 'Oops i win' button. The ban made blue reactive(which was a clear Tier 1 for many years in UR/x Twin) basically unplayable as you have to jump through a lot of hoops to make it work.

    2)It is natural and valid that ex Twin and Blue control players are crying about their decks since they got artificially knocked out of competition.

    3)Blue has many issues that involve: A)Incapability of closing games in a timely fashion, B)No form of good and timely card advantage, C)Lack of generic answers to respond a diverse and fast metagame.

    4)The cards that are on the banlist and COULD help: Preordain, Jace,the Mind Sculptor, Splinter Twin.

    5)Cards that could enter the format via printing: Counterspell, Instant-Speed Compulsive Research, Force of Will variant, etc.

    I hate this but the most efficient and quick way of preventing bans and give back the players what they had is to unban Splinter Twin. I really don't care if some archetypes can't be played. The fact is that the floodgates are open in Modern, and everything that is powerful, it's bascially broken. You NEED to have a police deck or card in eternal formats. If you don't things get out of control quickly.

    I'm not saying that the bannings post-Twin were bad ones. They were ok between the Twinless context. When one powerful card gets banned, then another comes to take the place and so on.
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • 1

    posted a message on Reformation of Modern - If You Want Something Done Right, Do it Yourself (banlist updated 2/13/17)
    Quote from Joban8 »
    I voted for starting with the current banlist without a doubt. Starting without Banlist just takes up too much time. You will have to ban at least 10 cards for sure. Maybe SFM, Jace and BBE stay there without a voice but to me those cards belong there with our current cardpool.

    Considering there won't be reprints like Counterspell, Baleful Strix, etc, my intial guess is to go something like this:

    Add to Banlist: Simian Spirit Guide, Mox Opal and Deceiver Exarch.

    Remove from Banlist: Splinter Twin, 1 or 2 Artifact Lands and Summer Bloom OR Seething Song.

    I've already posted this changes before. However, this is not where i would want to be IDEALLY. What do i mean by this? The format will never be perfect with Splinter Twin available. Why? Because UR/x Twin builds have shown to us that they can be the best deck in the format, and be a "safe" bet to compete at higher level like Grand Prix events or SCG Tour, WMCQ,etc. To me this is just bad because it would make Modern like Legacy in the sense that there´s a "safe" choice for any given metagame. However, i prefer the format to be policed by a control deck that wins on T4 and has a high skill ceiling than a T3 or T2 russian roulette deck.

    Also, i'm against adding expansions artifically. The further i would go is to just take out 8th and 9th edition and get rid of the vicious hosers like Moon and Bridge that make up for unfun games. Blood Moon without SSG should be mostly fine though.


    With all due respect, this sounds like nothing but opinionated nonsense. If the whole point of this is to re-evaluate the banlist by testing and gathering data, then let the results determine whether these "vicious hosers" are actually ban-worthy rather than anecdotal cases of butthurt. Until then, hook a brother up with whatever you're smoking; I'd love to experience your fantasy world where it's rational to ban SSG/Mox Opal, but artifact lands & summer bloom are totally legit.


    Ok, you say i'm going for opinionated nonsense and you clearly have bias towards Opal and Bridge/Moon. Seems legit.

    First of all, i NEVER said i would ban Moon/Bridge. I said that i'm AGAINST adding expansions, and if anything, we should take expansions out. Bridge and Moon ARE unfun for most people. Make a poll if you don't believe me. You can continue to believe that being Mooned on T2 is so much fun.

    Opal and SSG go in the same category as they push the barrier to far towards Fast mana-play. My initial guess of the banlist was to slow down the format to where WOTC wants and keep the nonsense out of the format.

    Bloom and Song go in the same category as the departure of SSG would kill many combos. I don't want combo players to not have a home in Modern so naturally i figured that we could give them one of those. Song might be safer without Probe. The 'OR' clause has that magic, you can choose one or the other, it's very pretty much up for debate if you will.

    Lastly, Aftifact lands would enable fast starts form Affinity and some random control decks. I think i prefer Lands than Opal since Opal is constatly being used to break the T4 rule, or being played in the ´SB hate Roulette' Affinity that it's explosiveness makes up for lopsided matchups if you don't have enough Stony Silence, Ancient Grudge and/or boatloads of removal.
    Posted in: Modern
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.