Jund and Abzan aren't even performing well right now. At all. I actually think they could do with a small buff. Bloom winning at a mull to 5 and no land T1 on camera is a pretty big testament to its absurdity. Its not that the deck is too consistent, its that you just can't interact.
Its not running blight herder because it is running heartless summoning and its all in on casting Ulamog ASAP as evident by the 4x conduit. There is a very good deck in modern already that does that job way better and frequently wins tournaments. If your goal in modern is to drop Ulamog consistently early, then you should be playing tron. I have no problem with trying out new ideas for the deck, but if you want a hammer, don't pick up a screwdriver and start pounding a nail with it. Go buy a hammer.
There are countless 5-0 NON G eldrazi decks up on MTGGoldfish. Would you like me to send you my own league results of 4-1 and 5-0? I mean, seriously? Its pretty obvious that Mono B, BW, and BR have all put up results. Have you not been paying attention? I said nothing even close to "I say so." There are literally pages of the deck doing well online. When you can show me something similar for BG, Ill believe you. I know people are playing it. So it isn't for lack of trying. The deck is just really really bad, and you keep championing it like its the *****. LOL. K.
Except Mishra's workshop isn't legendary and doesn't require 2 pieces to actually tap for mana. Have you even played the deck? "Unfair" is the last word Id use to describe. In fact, "unfair" is exactly what rips this deck to shreds. It might feel insane vs something like Jund or Grixis or Twin. However, the deck has some serious flaws vs Tron/Scapeshift/Amulet. Not to mention Burn and Infect can pose many problems. Oh, we also lose to traditional control decks that can out grind us. UW, UWR, and the likes are just beatings.
You're just not adding anything to discussion by being dense and stubborn about a bad card. Literally everyone is telling you its not worth it, but you can't take that.
Similar? They do the exact same thing with absolutely 0 upside to the new card. Are you ******* joking? We are running blight herder because he summons 3 1/1s, costs sometimes as little as 2 lands, and he is searchable by eye of Ugin. The card you are suggesting has literally no upside over nameless inversion except for being colorless which lets it hit an etched champion (A card we have zero ******* issue with). Your strawman of comparing herder to hellion is completely ludicrous, kid. The card you brought up is bad. Its a clone of a card that DOESNT SEE PLAY, and it offers no more upside. If you think that is anywhere CLOSE to compare hellion to herder, then you are really ******* bad at evaluating cards.
Seriously, you're completely garbage at evaluating cards if you can't see how similar this new card is to nameless inversion and how completely different blight herder is from hellion. Like, you're just being dense as **** because nobody likes the card you thought was good just because "Oh, its new and colorless."
Look up irony? Heres some irony. You're so good at evaluating cards. BG is such a good color combination for this deck. Everyone should play 4 of these on release. It needs an immediate ban.
It would be funny if the part about BG being the best color combo wasn't the truth.
You really are just confirming how bad you are at evaluating cards. Please show some results, kid.
Does their deck limit the unfair things I can do? Yes? Side it out. No? Leave it in. Im siding it out against control and midrange. Im leaving it in against combo and aggro.
If you want to be a better player, lay out your 75. Ask yourself, "If Im playing against ... which 60 cards out of these 75 would I want to shuffle up?" Don't think of things as in or out. Your main board is just a safe default. You should be building your deck between games with new information and a 75 card pool. If Im against twin, I know I want my combo creatures and spellskite. I might also want tefari or keranos to give them an unanswerable threat. Id also sleeve dispels and there is no way I would play cryptic. Im not asking myself "What should I take in and out?" Im asking myself, how can I build the BEST 60 card deck for this matchup with what is in front of me. Doing that, you'll understand the matchup better, and hopefully your 75 better for adjusting.
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
Seriously, you're completely garbage at evaluating cards if you can't see how similar this new card is to nameless inversion and how completely different blight herder is from hellion. Like, you're just being dense as **** because nobody likes the card you thought was good just because "Oh, its new and colorless."
1
You really are just confirming how bad you are at evaluating cards. Please show some results, kid.
1
1
If you want to be a better player, lay out your 75. Ask yourself, "If Im playing against ... which 60 cards out of these 75 would I want to shuffle up?" Don't think of things as in or out. Your main board is just a safe default. You should be building your deck between games with new information and a 75 card pool. If Im against twin, I know I want my combo creatures and spellskite. I might also want tefari or keranos to give them an unanswerable threat. Id also sleeve dispels and there is no way I would play cryptic. Im not asking myself "What should I take in and out?" Im asking myself, how can I build the BEST 60 card deck for this matchup with what is in front of me. Doing that, you'll understand the matchup better, and hopefully your 75 better for adjusting.