That said, if you want RW Skred, you may as well play a variation on the Nahiri LD/LD build. Path's a quicker piece of removal than your Skred and is less likely to give you Wurmcoil tokens to deal with if you find yourself facing down a Wurmcoil Engine. Lockdown effects nullify the land you give them.
You play a game of creature kill, then win with your dragons and/or planeswalkers. The goal's to stay a bit more red-oriented, but eh the deck seems like its fun if you're into the attrition game.
The name's a reference to the Incubus from suicide squad - here Bedlam Reveler represents Incubus. You could say Chandra's my Enchantress.
No, my evidence is what Ms Broaddrick said in her AMA. My position's not indefensible when we have the individual's words as evidence. If I had rode Hillary getting the child rapist guy off, and called that rape enabling, you would be correct in stating I've made an untenable argument (for the very reasons you've already given - Hillary was just doing her job there).
The fact is, we have a victim accusing Hillary of intimidation in regards to an incident between her and Bill. Now, if you've sat through a university orientation wherein they discuss sexual assault, including the reporting of sexual assault, you'll see where Hillary's status as a rape enabler has its basis in academia. Now, she did ride the birther train for a bit in her campaign, but in the end no one was hurt because of it. So bringing that out as one of Hillary's skeletons seems moot. Her status as a rape enabler is more troubling to me, mainly because you have people like the judge that let Brock Turner out early that still seem to discount the victim's emotional state. It simply makes the individual, in this case Hillary, morally reprehensible.
If I had made a mistake here, I would admit to it. But, I have nothing to admit to here - except that my moral convictions won't let me give Hillary (or #Killary as the facebookers like to call her) my vote.
Lol yes flooding that booger sucks. I lean more toward Stormbreath as my other beater simply because of Abzan's popularity, but Demigod getting its effect off and becoming a threat is too damn fun.
I can only take Ms Broaddrick's word - and she's not given me any reason not to, whereas Hillary's done that many times already - and wouldn't presume to put words in her mouth or make assumptions on her behalf. In closing, and again, we can continue to dance around making assumptions on the victim's behalf, or we can agree to disagree like adults.
Per her Reddit AMA, Ms Broaddick came away from the incident frightened of the Clintons (her employers were also frightened of what the Clintons might do to them under the table). In this case, Hillary's a rape enabler by way of using her clout to intimidate Ms Broaddick. I find it morally repugnant (especially since Hillary can't hide behind her job for this one). That said, I'm mature enough to agree to disagree with you if you've planted your flag on that hill.
Juanita Broaddrick, though my use of victims in the post that you've quoted also applies to the one whose rapist got off with Hillary's help in the courtroom. The verdict's the verdict, but it doesn't not make his prey a victim (again, this was just Hillary doing her job, so I'm not counting it as an instance of rape enabling for the sake of our discussion). I mean, if the girl's rapist went to prison and ended up getting HIV, we'd be paying for the scum's medical treatments.
We're in agreement on one count - I'm also disgusted by the "guilt by association" mentality; but I'm not talking about her getting the alleged child rapist off. It's the under the table threats to the victims that accused Bill that I'm talking about.
Its more a call to lead by example - but I don't see Lady Lich doing any of the gun-grabbing. I imagine the continual gun-grabbing that went on under the table, and in their house per the Wikileaks stuff, soured Lady Lich on gun-grabbing.
edit - Trump did the birther thing, Hillary was a rape enabler. They both have their skeletons.
After seeing this thing Trump did with his big announcement...he played the news stations like suckers. That's the kind of clever I'd feel safe about having as my Commander in Chief.
Were they *****ing because you've got fun decks like Breach and Goryo making it? Fuarking lol.
4 Simian Spirit Guide
4 Thunderbreak Regent
3 Stormbreath Dragon
Planeswalkers
2 Chandra, Torch of Defiance
3 Koth of the Hammer
1 Sarkhan, the Dragonspeaker
4 Lightning Bolt
4 Terminate
3 Boom // Bust
3 Anger of the Gods
4 Blood Moon
4 Verdant Catacombs
4 Bloodstained Mire
3 Blood Crypt
4 Graven Cairns
2 Swamp
8 Mountain
The idea is to turn your Booms into Sinkholes, targeting Catacombs or Mire.
Spread your mana right and your nonbo becomes a nonnonbo. I took this to a 5-0 in MTGO (using PtE in lieu of Oust): http://www.channelfireball.com/articles/deck-of-the-day-modern-rw-nahiri-land-destruction/
That said, if you want RW Skred, you may as well play a variation on the Nahiri LD/LD build. Path's a quicker piece of removal than your Skred and is less likely to give you Wurmcoil tokens to deal with if you find yourself facing down a Wurmcoil Engine. Lockdown effects nullify the land you give them.
4 Thunderbreak Regent
2 Stormbreath Dragon
3 Bedlam Reveler
Planeswalkers
2 Chandra, Torch of Defiance
1 Sarkhan, the Dragonspeaker
1 Ob Nixilis Reignited
4 Lightning Bolt
2 Burst Lightning
4 Terminate
2 Collective Brutality
2 Night's Whisper
2 Magma Jet
2 Kolaghan's Command
4 Anger of the Gods
4 Bloodstained Mire
4 Blood Crypt
4 Graven Cairns
1 Lavaclaw Reaches
4 Swamp
8 Mountain
You play a game of creature kill, then win with your dragons and/or planeswalkers. The goal's to stay a bit more red-oriented, but eh the deck seems like its fun if you're into the attrition game.
The name's a reference to the Incubus from suicide squad - here Bedlam Reveler represents Incubus. You could say Chandra's my Enchantress.
The fact is, we have a victim accusing Hillary of intimidation in regards to an incident between her and Bill. Now, if you've sat through a university orientation wherein they discuss sexual assault, including the reporting of sexual assault, you'll see where Hillary's status as a rape enabler has its basis in academia. Now, she did ride the birther train for a bit in her campaign, but in the end no one was hurt because of it. So bringing that out as one of Hillary's skeletons seems moot. Her status as a rape enabler is more troubling to me, mainly because you have people like the judge that let Brock Turner out early that still seem to discount the victim's emotional state. It simply makes the individual, in this case Hillary, morally reprehensible.
If I had made a mistake here, I would admit to it. But, I have nothing to admit to here - except that my moral convictions won't let me give Hillary (or #Killary as the facebookers like to call her) my vote.
edit - Trump did the birther thing, Hillary was a rape enabler. They both have their skeletons.
No Teferi
ISHIGGYDIGGYDOO