Can I ask why it matters, since Welcome Decks are pretty much just draft chaff?
True. But it would interest me to see the complete deck list.
Especially since Wizard iterated multiple time, that these should somehow fit together with the Planeswalker decks. Which you can grasp from the cards which are in there, but it is interesting to see which are 2 offs and which are 1 offs.
Most things this subforum are not rumors since most threads have direct links to the mother ship or other sides which got confirmed preview.
I am in fact asking for a rumor: If someone know or has seen the deck lists for the Welcome Decks yet. If that is not the appropriate forum you could point me towards the correct one.
Unfortunately not all of them. But I also noticed, that many of them are now working again.
On the working ones I would suggest replacing these with NewRefs, whenever possible.
With time only the broken DailyRefs will remain, and with many of the links working the replacement can work much faster.
"Aiyanna is all colors." would also be replaced by an color indicator, so the card has even less text.
The only problem I have with her is that there is literally no reason not to play her. Gitaxian Probe would also go in every deck even if I could not produce blue mana...
Peacekeeper Colossus, 3
Artifact - Vehicle (Rare)
1W: Another target Vehicle you control becomes an artifact creature until end of turn.
Crew 4
6/6
"Keeping Peace? Its sole purpose is to keep people in fear."
--- Saheeli Rai
You mean like this Omnath, Locus of Mana? These are card-tags and the syntacs looks like this: <card>Omnath, Locus of Mana</card>. Just replace the <> brackets with [] brackets respectively and it should work.
Since this is the wiki subforum, in the wiki we use c-tags which looks like this <c>Omnath, Locus of Mana</c>. In the wikie we actually use the <> brackets. So no replacement required here.
I agree things need to be consitent. Singular has the big advantage to allow [[Zombie]]s for example. Since we had this request and I think it is sensible to have singular title I would support the effort in moving everything to singular.
True. But it would interest me to see the complete deck list.
Especially since Wizard iterated multiple time, that these should somehow fit together with the Planeswalker decks. Which you can grasp from the cards which are in there, but it is interesting to see which are 2 offs and which are 1 offs.
There are probably 13 basic lands in the 30 card deck, since previous welcome deck also had 13 lands.
Thanks. Unfortunately the deck lists are not complete.
It only lists each cards which will be in there once. We know it will be a 30 card deck, but not the quantities of the individual cards in the deck.
Thanks, but I was talking about the Welcome Decks not the Planeswalker Decks.
I am in fact asking for a rumor: If someone know or has seen the deck lists for the Welcome Decks yet. If that is not the appropriate forum you could point me towards the correct one.
So unfortunately still a lot of work.
On the working ones I would suggest replacing these with NewRefs, whenever possible.
With time only the broken DailyRefs will remain, and with many of the links working the replacement can work much faster.
The only problem I have with her is that there is literally no reason not to play her.
Gitaxian Probe would also go in every deck even if I could not produce blue mana...
Peacekeeper Colossus, 3
Artifact - Vehicle (Rare)
1W: Another target Vehicle you control becomes an artifact creature until end of turn.
Crew 4
6/6
"Keeping Peace? Its sole purpose is to keep people in fear."
--- Saheeli Rai
Since this is the wiki subforum, in the wiki we use c-tags which looks like this <c>Omnath, Locus of Mana</c>. In the wikie we actually use the <> brackets. So no replacement required here.
Any opinions on that?
Here we discuses the Magic wiki and its progress. You are invited to contribute there yourself.
Perhaps take a look at the Market Street which is our trading platform: http://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/market-street
Or the modern forum: http://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/the-game/modern