OK same scenario but an opponent takes control of your avatar of woe on the turn after you played it. Would the Avatar still hae summoning sickness even though it was in play during the new controller's upkeep?
Would a grapeshot with a storm count of 2 produce 4 or 6 damage if a pyromancer's swath is in play. I ask because it seems like it could be the cornerstone of an interesting burn deck.
Follow up, Do you have to discard your hand if you didn't use the first ability. Example: playing the swath on your third turn and nothing else. Would you still have to discard your hand?
Gigadrowse has applications BEYOND dealing with counterspells. It can lock a red/green aggro (or any other aggro) for one turn giving you the time you need to win. It can shutout multiple counterpells whereas pact will only deal with one. I don't see Pact of Negation as the replacement for gigadrowse.
I though the movie was decent but felt VERY rushed.
I've heard that Kirsten Dunst didn't want to do anymore movies and the studio wanted Venom and thats why Sam Raimi made Spiderman 3 like he did. He didn't want to do Venom because he wanted all of his villains to embody a human characteristic and have redeemable traits. He could have easily made two great movies instead of one decent movie with the material but with all those limitations and with the studio demanding reshoots and more "action" this is what we get. The movie had to many villains and not enough character develoment. Both Harry and Peters transformations come to easily and seem very facky. Evil Peter is really just assertive and at worst sort of annoying but hardly evil.
Rite of Flame
Rite of Flame
Seething Song
Pyromancer's Swath
Grapeshot
for 7 or 15 at the opponent's head?
Follow up, Do you have to discard your hand if you didn't use the first ability. Example: playing the swath on your third turn and nothing else. Would you still have to discard your hand?
What the heck is BDW, or is it BWD?
I've heard that Kirsten Dunst didn't want to do anymore movies and the studio wanted Venom and thats why Sam Raimi made Spiderman 3 like he did. He didn't want to do Venom because he wanted all of his villains to embody a human characteristic and have redeemable traits. He could have easily made two great movies instead of one decent movie with the material but with all those limitations and with the studio demanding reshoots and more "action" this is what we get. The movie had to many villains and not enough character develoment. Both Harry and Peters transformations come to easily and seem very facky. Evil Peter is really just assertive and at worst sort of annoying but hardly evil.