2019 Holiday Exchange!
A New and Exciting Beginning
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on The Locust God [Let's Brew!]
    Mystic remora
    Posted in: Commander (EDH)
  • posted a message on SplinterTwin
    Hi, I personally used to run Pili pala but with a huge chunk of the current meta being bug delver, I feel like this could use some effect like unsubstantiate to combat abrupt decay as most bug delver lists run that as a playset.
    The main appeal of twin in combo was that pestermite and deceiver could just go on a beat down plan with a control element, and that combined with acceleration pushed RUG delver into existence, because green gave access to goyf and dorks. In my personal opinion, I think RUG is the way to go as you get worldly tutor, green suns zenith, Goyf, deathrite shaman, sylvan library, and can even run a crop rotation with stage/dark depths package somewhere in the 75. If you do move to a more creature centric build, you could also justify running aether vial (but I personally wouldn't, by worth looking into) to put creatures in without fear of counterspells.
    Speaking of which, if you decide to stay UR, I would run some number of true-name nemesis in the side as splinter twin on that is a clock most fair decks can't beat, and makes your delver matchup bearable with a overload of threats.
    While it seems cheeky, I ran two turnabouts in Pili pala as it can be a time walk if cast at upkeep. It works as a easier to cast cryptic command if you want to tap creatures vs merfolk or elves (that usage is kinda meta dependent tho) and can ramp you if need be in fringe situations.
    Sorry if this thread is super dead but I am looking into this deck as I think with tuning it might be in a good position vs the current meta of delver.
    Posted in: Developing (Legacy)
  • posted a message on [Primer] Legacy Pili-Pala
    As far as running muddle the mixture, I personally like it as a counter spell that finds most parts of the combo. And you may be right, but the primer is nowhere near finished though. This is just based on the results that I have had from several different local tournaments, but I want to expand the cards to show izzit and temur colored variants and different options that can go with those. thank you for the input though, it is very much appreciated.
    Posted in: Developing (Legacy)
  • posted a message on [Deck] Twisted Metal - Mono Blue Combo Crackdown
    I would try crucible of worlds/wasteland as crucible both keeps your opponents from playing magic and protects you from land hate. I also feel like you could run some number of petals over lands to help power out a chalice on 1 turn 1 more consistently.
    Posted in: Developing (Legacy)
  • posted a message on Pia's Burn
    If you go white you get enchantment tutors, swords to plow shares, and a lot of sideboard. If you go blue, paradoxical outcome is great with swift spear, you get force of will, and jace is good in any deck
    Posted in: Developing (Legacy)
  • posted a message on [Primer] Legacy Pili-Pala
    Hello. I have not really seen any replies, but if someone wants to help me with the primer, I could really use it.
    Posted in: Developing (Legacy)
  • posted a message on Cruel Control: Ultimate Ultimatum
    What do you guys think about replacing the damnation in the main with the angers in the side? I think switching them would help a lot as my testing has moved to mainly online where most decks are running copious amounts of mana dorks.
    Posted in: Control
  • posted a message on Cruel Control: Ultimate Ultimatum
    TBH I think the deck is much more competitive than you are giving it credit for. This is the control deck that actually plays like a, you know, CONTROL DECK instead of just being a tempo deck with better removal. With the ban of G Probe, this deck actually gets a lot better as the format slows down. You can kill a t1 birds, a t2 goyf, a turn 3 lili, and a turn 4 rhino with slot of consistiencey, and a lot of control decks focus so much on the early game tempo that they miss out on this critical mass of removal and counters. As long as Afro is on the decline, this deck is great.
    Posted in: Control
  • posted a message on Cruel Control: Ultimate Ultimatum
    Yea, I run phyrexian revokers because of pili-pala. I won a legacy tournament with it so now like 3 people are running it in modern. Smile
    Posted in: Control
  • posted a message on Cruel Control: Ultimate Ultimatum
    I gotta maindeck fulminator mages. We have 12 tron players and 24 modern players at my lgs. Frown
    Posted in: Control
  • posted a message on Cruel Control: Ultimate Ultimatum
    God if it can't ult without playing bad borderline modern unplayable spells, then I might just go back to standard or legacy for awhile.

    You know, where I can run a mono counterspell deck and thing in the ice and win.
    Posted in: Control
  • posted a message on [Primer] Legacy Pili-Pala
    Thread is now more or less finished, feel free to post
    Posted in: Developing (Legacy)
  • posted a message on Cruel Control: Ultimate Ultimatum
    all I'm saying is that the new Big Boss's ultimate better win the game if it costs that much
    Posted in: Control
  • posted a message on [Primer] Legacy Pili-Pala
    This is a work in progress, and the deck can and probably will change as time goes on.

    -Why Pili-Pala?
    Do you like janky combo decks? Do you live for the moment when your opponent has to read your combo cards several times and call a judge at least once a match? Do you like twin esq two card combos that are hard to deal with? Do you like winning on turn 2, but also having the ability to turn into control? Pili-Pala may be the deck for you!!!
    Pili-Pala Decklist

    --Card Choices
    Pili-Pala Rate5 You have to have this in play to combo off and win, so play it as a 4 of ALWAYS. It may be tempting to go down a copy or two, but don't. You'll need them. Run 4.
    Grand Architect Rate5 This card is even more essential than Pili-Pala because it gives you a better option on the Faerie Conclave plan and if you have to, they can be a beater in multiples. I once had a game where my opponent surgical extracted all of the copies of Pili-Pala from my deck. I then proceeded to draw all 4 copies and swing for 12 every turn until he died. ALWAYS RUN 4!
    Laboratory Maniac Rate4.5 While many people will tell you otherwise, this card essential to have at least SOMEWHERE in your 75. Main deck this if you are running into a lot of players who run leyline of sanctity, or similar effects. In the unlikely case that you resort to the beat down plan, he is also buffed by Architect. Run at least 1 in the 75
    Azure Mage Rate5 RUN THESE. Anyone who looks at your list will tell you that some other instant and/or sorcery is better. It's not. Most of them are not beaters for the beat down plan, and if they are they are too much mana and probably cannot be tutored by Muddle the Mixture, and they are not buffed by Architect. The reason you play this is that when you have infinite mana, you can use this to draw you deck. Run at least 2.
    Walking Ballista Rate3.5 This is another win con that you can use to deal infinite damage to win the game, but it is a creature and is therefore only worth it against agro matchups like menfolk or infect to ping lords/buffable creatures. It dies to literally almost any removal that control decks bother playing, and it requires you to run Tolaria West, which comes in tapped, to tutor for it. Run 0-2 in the side, but no more than that.
    Drift of Phantasms Rate1 This card is bad, but you NEED to run it. a 0/5 defender for 3 mana is bad, even by the standard of defenders, and if you actually cast this card instead of transmuting it, be prepared for some ridicule from nearby players. Unfortunately, run 4.
    Pact of Negation Rate5 In this deck, this is better than force of will. In this deck, you have to untap with Pili-Pala on the field. Often times, you will play Architect and then immediately tap Architect to play Pili-Pala, and this is the situation you should go for if you don't think you can win turn 2. Because of this, you either will have infinite mana at you upkeep to pay for this, or you aren't planning to untap. In 9-10 Situations, this is a strictly better version of Force of Will in your deck. Run 4 in the main.
    Force of Will Rate4.5 This is the main reason many people bother running blue in legacy, other than cantrips. While in this deck this is a strictly worse version of Pact of Negation, it gives us zero mana counterspell numbers 9-12. Run 4 in the main.
    Daze Rate4 This card is good against value based decks, combo, and agro. This is next to useless in the late game, unless you end up in a counter war and your opponent taps out, or if they decide to play their cards on curve, which still isn't great against any deck running blue as Force of Will just shuts it down. The only good thing about this is that it encourages three for ones, as the main way to counteract this is Force of Will. Run 4 in your 75, and at least 2 in the main.
    Counterspell Rate3 This is bad. Its good, but its bad. In this type of deck, any counter that costs mana slows you down and only gets stuck in your hand. Run 0-3 in the side.
    Muddle the Mixture Rate5 This is a Pili-Pala. This is a Pyromantics. This is a Azure Mage. This is a partial Negate. YOU NEED TO RUN THIS. Run 4 in the main, no less.
    Unsubstantiate Rate4 This is great in the side against abrupt decay. Run 1-2 in your 75.
    Mana Leak/Remand Rate1 In legacy, you shouldn't be running this. The only reason you should even consider this is if you are playing on a budget or are planning to upgrade from the modern version of the deck. Don't run this, unless you have a good reason.
    -Non-Land Mana
    Chrome Mox Rate5 This is what lets you win on turn two. Run 4 in the main.
    Simian/Elvish Spirit Guide Rate4.5 These are strictly worse than Chrome Mox, and slightly better than Lotus Petal. If you are going all in on the combo, and don't want to have the beatdown backup plan, then this is great. Run 0, or run 8. There is no in-between.
    Lotus Petal Rate2 This is really bad, as it dies to chalice on zero, it can be countered, and it can only be used once. This is only viable if you are going all in AND are using Mox Opal. Run 0, or run 4. There is no in-between.
    Mox Opal Rate2 This either REALLY good, or REALLY bad. Only run this if you are going all in, and even then, this still isn't great. If you are not running actual lands, this HAS TO BE A FOUR OF. Otherwise, run all of the other listed artifact mana along with this and hope you don't have too many in your opening hand. Run 0-4.
    -Draw Spells
    Ponder Rate5 This is a auto include. You need to find the combo and a finisher to win, and this does that. Always run 4.
    Preordain Rate4.5 Usually, it is correct to run some number of these, even though they only let you see two cards down if you want one of the top two on top. Run 2-4.
    Impulse Rate4 In the modern version of the deck, you run anticipate, and this is strictly better, however, it is a little expensive mana wise for what it does. Run 0-1.
    Brainstorm Rate4 This is bad in the main deck, as there is no way to shuffle without ponder so you are literally drawing your worst cards for the next two turns. This does, however, shine in the sideboard as it saves your combo pieces from hand disruption at instant speed. Run 0-2 in the side.
    Gitaxian Probe Rate0 Don't run this unless you are running the landless version of the deck. Yes, this lets you see their hand and expect what removal they have, but you would rather this card be COUNTERING that spell instead of just seeing it coming. Don't run this.
    Sleight of Hand/Serum Visions/Ancestral Visions/Anticipate Rate0 See Remand/Mana Leak.
    Academy Ruins Rate5 This is super important to this deck. While not run as much in legacy, surgical extraction on Pili-Pala makes it harder (although not impossible) to win, and this can counteract that at instant speed. It also means that if you have one on the field and the mana to activate it, the only way to perminantly get rid of Pili-Pala is to exile it, except in odd fringe cases. This is legendary, and having two in your opening hand makes it highly unkeepable due to the low land count and you NEED to get to double blue to win with the combo. Even if you are on a budget, this is what you want to spend it on. I have never had a game were I played Ruins and didn't feel like I was closer to winning. Run exactly 1, no more, no less.
    Faerie Conclave Rate5 This is your back up if someone somehow gets rid of every copy of pili-pala or grand architect. This is the best man land you can run as it is blue, and therefore buffed by grand architect, flies, and it trades with a flipped delver. Run 4.
    Mutavault Rate4 Faerie Conclave is a hard card to come by. They cost basically nothing, but they are still hard to come by. You NEED to run a man land of some kind, and this is the next best thing. If you can't run conclaves, run 4.
    Tolaria West Rate3 These are not horrible, but they are not good either. If you have the combo and need to protect zenith, this is good as you can tutor for a pact of negation before casting zenith for extra backup. It also finds Walking Ballista and Hanger back Walker, but Hanger back is just bad, and Walking Ballista is a sideboard card. Run at least 2 in the side if you run Ballistas.
    Blue Fetchlands Rate4 If you want to run top, run these. If you want to mainboard brainstorm, run these. If you want to triple the cost of your mana base for very little actual advantage, run these. Run 0-6, but don't run more than that.
    Island Rate5 Rate5 This is the most powerful magic card ever printed. I don't know what wizards was on when they printed this card, but it has been reprinted in every set since alpha. Run as many as you see fit, but don't run too little. Run at least 3 in the main.
    While the regular version with the optional beatdown back up plan is probably the best, I have found (through hours of searching because this deck is way more popular in modern) that some people have found success with alternative versions of the deck.
    Delver ~ This version forgoes pact of negation in favor of running the card Delver of secrets. The main idea behind this is the same one that surrounded modern tarmotwin. Your opponent only has so many removal and counter spells. This leaves them with one of two options. Get beaten to death while holding removal for the combo, and then failing to remove your threat before it is too late, or killing your threat and hoping you don't have the combo in hand.
    Countertop ~ The deck already runs top, and LOTS of 1, 2, and 3 drops. This is also one of the main reasons to use blue colored fetches. Maybe the second most competitive version of the deck.
    Manaless ~ This version doesn't bother with slow, outdated lands. I uses alternative sources of mana to play the combo, and can win turn 2 more consistiently than other versions, with the downside of losing daze and making pact of negation significantly worse.

    This is my first primer, although I have been active in several different primers in the past. If you have any advice or questions about the primer, the deck, the matchups, or the card choices (i.e. "Is card A good with/against card B?") feel free to ask. I would be glad to discus the deck with you, and hopefully learn something new along the way. If you use this deck in a tournament, even if it is just an fnm size event, feel free to post results, but please also post a deck list as I am trying to put together data on the viability of different cards verses different decks. Also, have fun confusing people! Smile
    Posted in: Developing (Legacy)
  • posted a message on Cruel Control: Ultimate Ultimatum
    If they follow the trend they have been going in previous sets, we'll get a bolis with a really high cmc that is crap, and we will get one at 3-4 cmc that is really good. They have done that with most of the gatewatch, and maybe it'll make grixis tier 1 if it's good enough. Idk tho, maybe it's just wishful thinking.
    Posted in: Control
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.