Quote from Teia Rabishu »Quote from ProfessorWhen »It is my opinion that we (at least those involved in this issue) live in a country that bases its judgement on the philosophy of "innocent until proven guilty."
That's for courts of law, though, not for courts of public opinion. While cases like Sprankle's are very clear-cut with lots of evidence of harassment, the greater problems facing women in the community boil down to lower-tier harassment that adds up over time, with little to no evidence to "prove" guilt. Hence why it's imperative to believe women when we say when an environment or player is being toxic, without endless demands for "proof" and constant reinforcement of "it's just a joke, relax."
Why is harassment only a women's problem? Furthermore, if that is your stance it seems like you are supporting the counter-harassment that situations like this always seem to generate when put into the "court of public opinion."
2
2
When I read the title of this thread, my first thought was "horse tribal?!", then I thought "Oh wait, no, that's just the stupid name of blog or something that's previewing this card".
1
1
1
6
Exactly! So let's actually reprint good, $$$ cards so prices will drop and people can actually afford to buy them and use them to play the game. People are making money off this game. Tons of it. And a lot of them are doing it by preying off Wizard's reluctance to reprint cards.
Personally, I don't care about Archenemy. I think it looks fun, but I don't know anyone who has any interest in playing it, so on the premise of this being an Archenemy product, I would pass on it. But if the decks had more interesting reprints, I'd pick it up just to get some interesting and rare cards. I wanted to get this set because I collect Planeswalkers, but there just isn't anything else in the deck that I want or need bad enough to buy it. The decks just look boring and bland (seriously? They couldn't think of anything better than a couple of vanilla 2/4 creatures to put in the Gideon deck?).
1
13
2
1