Four or so. Why?Uh, at what age was that, again?
- mikeyG
- Registered User
-
Member for 19 years, 3 months, and 17 days
Last active Sat, Jun, 17 2023 09:55:06
- 15 Followers
- 15,533 Total Posts
- 596 Thanks
-
Feb 11, 2007mikeyG posted a message on My Hoohaa MonologuePosted in: {bloggyG}
-
Jan 31, 2007mikeyG posted a message on my life..... it has no real reason.........i love that joy division songPosted in: PODOBLOGOCAST 2.1
it really speaks to me -
Jan 30, 2007mikeyG posted a message on My Big StinkAnyone who knows me can see the sweet irony of that comment.Posted in: {bloggyG}
1) I already moved out of my toxic waste-adjacent apartment
2) I'm currently saving to move to BC
3) My only reason for staying is financial. I simply don't have the money to live elsewhere (yet). I don't have much love for my hometown. -
Jan 29, 2007mikeyG posted a message on My Personal VictoryAmen. And I bask in that glow as often as I can, because I'm elite.Posted in: {bloggyG}
-
Jan 29, 2007mikeyG posted a message on My Life As An OrphanHmm, pained by something. Not sure what that could be. Might be the paternal jettisoning ....... nah. :slant:Posted in: {bloggyG}
I'm going to be blunt. My two-way street of family drama is a touchy subject for me. Especially now. I only brought it up because I felt the need to vent and this is the best place. My real life friends would only offer sympathy, and I'd rather avoid the chick flick moments. Little risk of those here. But my venting doesn't mean I'm looking to share my 'pain' beyond that. -
Jan 27, 2007mikeyG posted a message on My Life As An OrphanI'd consider myself once burned, twice shy. I'm more jaded than cynical. I'm only pessimistic about the motives of people who have given me reason to be.Posted in: {bloggyG}
What do you mean what ails me? -
Jan 23, 2007mikeyG posted a message on My Crisis of FaithWell, that and JC loved jumping on couches, too. It's the real reason he was crucified.Posted in: {bloggyG}
I think it's funny that he's Scientology's Christ. He didn't even start the damn cult or have anything at all to do with its founding, he's just the idiot with the highest profile. -
Jan 23, 2007mikeyG posted a message on My First EntryAbsolutely, Tuatha. Though the trick is to act as if you secretly approved of the bandwagon in the first place.Posted in: {bloggyG}
Which I totally did. I always thought blogs were rad. - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Anyway, back to the topic.....
That doesn't seem very efficient to me. So they don't even try to see how much is needed, they just guess "more tthan last year" then go to town? I think taking stock of what is actually needed versus what's been budgetted in the past is smarter. But I guess then the agencies or whatever would get less money and where's the fun in that.
With a debt that big, no wonder it seems like every second person in America is hitting poverty.
Holy sweet Jebus!!!! Good luck with that. That much money is inconceivable to me. How did America get that much in debt?
And while the other systems do have their own share of kiddy styled games (Ratchet & Clank, Jak & Daxter, etc), the Gamecube definately has a higher concentration of them. Pretty much every game that comes from Nintendo itself is kiddish so there's a lot more of them on GC than on PS2 or XBox.
I'm just saying, maybe you should volunteer to leave the knife in the office anyway. Better that than to give everyone else something to use against you.
And then you almost used the knife they let you have in school to hurt a faculty member. Sure, you only punched him instead, but I think the school would be negilgent if they didn't at the very least reconsider allowing you to carry a knife in school. I still don't think it was such a hot idea to let any student carry a weapon on school property, no matter what the reason.
Exactly!!! I always hated that argument, like if I wanted to marry a guy it's the same thing as if I wanted to marry a penguin. Such a wierd and insulting argument.
Besides, gay marriage is legal in other countries and I don't think you see much people/animal marriages there.
Not kidding. I liked how a lot of the finer points in FF8's story had to be uncovered by the player because they weren't the focus of the game. Take for example Squall's parentage. I won't detail it here just in case, but the game never states exactly who his parents are, but if you dig at it you reveal it on your own. I liked the way Square did that instead of making everything fed right to the player. In the grande sceme of things, the main story is alright, but I'll admit it's not the best. I don't think it's the worst, though. I guess I just liked it cuz the main protagonist was such an identifiable character. At least for me.
And FF3/6 is really good, especially if you love massive parties (there's like 16 characters in all, I think). The story in that isn't all that good compared to CT, but it's still really good. You should pick it up, it was part of an Anthology set released for the PS1 a few years back. Worth getting, I think.
1)So you have money, that's nice, but a lot of money =/= being better
2)Hey cool, you're a Superpower, but just like money; power =/= being better
3)You're not the only country who does that. Not like America alone is trying to help the countries crushed by the tsunami disaster.
I mean, Bill Gates has money and George Dubya has a lot of power, does that make either of them better people than those with less money or power?
You've outlined a few ways that America has power, but you haven't in any way proven how that makes you better than any other country. All you've proven is that America is powerful, which I don't think anyone would dispute. But that doesn't make the country better.
ETA: You said you list was "widely accepted", by whom exactly? I don't think many from outside America would agree, nor do I think everyone within America would either. So yeah, accepted by who?
No, you misunderstood what I said. The statement that you quoted, which I have bolded for posterity, was supposed to be taken sarcastically. I was using what you said and apparently think to back up my point. I was saying you think everyone's jealous because you're the 'boss'. I personally don't believe that. That is part of the attitude of superiority I was talking about before, you just think we're all jealous cuz you're on top. The things I was "check"ing before are pieces of the whole attitude that I think is causing the Americans such grief.
Let's see, thinking you're (Americans, not the singular your) better than everyone else and not giving one iota of crap what anyone thinks of you? Check. Saying this isn't arrogant because it's the truth? Check. The rest of us are just jealous because you're the boss? Check. Yup, great job, you've just provided an exact example of the attitude I said way back on page 1 is the root cause of anti-American sentiment.
Thing is, it isn't a fact that America is better than any other nation, it's merely your opinion. It's nice to be proud of your country, but to do so doesn't precipitate the need to call your country better than the rest. There is no absolute in this, it can never be truth. What would you say to those who don't think America is better than everywhere else and then provide reasons why they think so? Just jealous? There are many who don't think your country is that great but feel no jealousy of your position or your power, myself included.
And simply calling the statement that America is the best not arrogant because it's the truth is ignorant. You might really think it's the best, and good for you, but it's not true. There really can't be a best because everyone's take on the matter will be different. It's not like the entire world voted unanimously to crown America the best country in the world. It's just your opinion, and not one every American would share I might add. So to proclaim your opinion as the truth really is pretty ignorant, and it's also arrogant. You're better because you're just better and everyone else can shut up because they're jealous?
I maintain that there's no such nation as the best, simply the best nation for an individual to live in. I don't think Canada is necessarily better than any other place but I do love it here. But I might also love it in Australia or in France, I wouldn't know until I've lived there.
One man's trash is another man's treasure and one man's king is another man's pauper.
ETA: Weeeeee, 100 posts!!!!! Cool!
So enjoy your stay here, even if it may only be a short one.
Yay! I just pwned someone! Neat! But why do I feel so empty inside........:tongue3:
Canada's not exactly just sitting back and letting the money flow, a large bulk of that donation is coming from the public and not the government. $150 million, I believe. But even so, we're not exactly a well-off country, just ask anyone who pays Canadian taxes. It takes a lot to fund our health and education systems, and then there's our massive public debt that's currently somewhere in the billions. And fighting for the world is a hard thing for the country to do when we're not really about that. Canada has always been about peacekeeping endeavours instead of out and out fighting, not that we could summon much of a fighting force if we wanted to. We're about as tough/intimidating as a six-week old kitten, and only half as cute.
All in all, I don't think it's really fair to compare the two countries, we may seem very similar but we're so different in almost every way. Policy, economy, attitude, military, we're like distant cousins rather than close siblings.
But as I said before, any contribution is good, and I think it's wrong to disparage any country for how much they do or don't give.
Not to harp on you but Canada has committed up to $425 million over the next five years. The exact details are here.
But I don't think who donated how much is as important as long as each country that is able to does something. No matter how much America gives, if its the biggest donor in the world or not, it's giving something. No one should be ragging on America, or any country, for not giving 'enough'.
America really is damned if they do, damned if they don't. We get huffy when you refuse to help, but then we lay into you for "butting in" when you do help. Kind of a sucky situation.
Although one potential problem is that many places would rather deal with their problems on their own and America 'helping' becomes more like interloping. America has so much power that it's easy to see why it'd want to use it to influence things around the globe, but eventually other nations become resentful of that power and the way America uses it. Enter the 'World Police' moniker.
So it's not always as easy of 'letting America help', some nations really don't want it. It's like when you're 15 or 16 and you want to do stuff on your own but your parents insist on doing thinngs for you and how that feels like you're being treated like a child. I can see how some people would interpret America helping out as almost condescending like the other nation is so inept that America has to go in and get things done the right way. The action can easily be interpretted as coming from a place of superiority that I can see how the 'inferior' nation would resent it even if the aid was never meant to be taken in such a way.