if the Ghosting wagon had any strength behind it, it would have persevered through my one-liner.
As for not lynching me, there are people that have actually been scummy (Kraj and Matowar, for example) and have some small consensus regarding their scumminess.
Big thumbs up to that first sentence. I like you.
Why matowar though? Does my "noob trying to improve" hard clear not do it for you?
/Head desk
I'm not a huge fan of noob clearing. However, I meant Mindreaver, I read the wrong row of my spreadsheet.
Jobie - ???. I've got literally nothing. He dropped his vote on Kraj and vanished. He's pushing nothing, and making minimal attempt to figure anything out. He's a fairly plausible scumbuddy of Ghosting for the way he dismissed the wagon on him in one of his few posts, maybe.
I'm useless on D1. Like as an analyst.
Also, the seriousness of my # question did not turn out as I hoped. I think this lends credence to the "Iso doesn't want/like mod-gaming". Hunger's lack of desire to answer annoys me, I could be swayed towards voting him.
Can you point to my dismissal of the Ghosting wagon, because I don't remember doing that?
if the Ghosting wagon had any strength behind it, it would have persevered through my one-liner.
As for not lynching me, there are people that have actually been scummy (Kraj and Matowar, for example) and have some small consensus regarding their scumminess.
Jobie - ???. I've got literally nothing. He dropped his vote on Kraj and vanished. He's pushing nothing, and making minimal attempt to figure anything out. He's a fairly plausible scumbuddy of Ghosting for the way he dismissed the wagon on him in one of his few posts, maybe.
I'm useless on D1. Like as an analyst.
Also, the seriousness of my # question did not turn out as I hoped. I think this lends credence to the "Iso doesn't want/like mod-gaming". Hunger's lack of desire to answer annoys me, I could be swayed towards voting him.
Can you point to my dismissal of the Ghosting wagon, because I don't remember doing that?
There is waaaaaay to much unprompted role info ITT. Loose lips sink ships, folks.
Jobie complains that were solving the game too fast ITT.
LOOK AT SEPPEL HES GOT JOKES.
Or it's the fact that I've seen games go sideways did to role discussions that are highly unprompted. Some of my best games as scum occurred because of subtle discussions narrowing down who has PRs and who doesnt. ITT it isn't even subtle. So I'm more annoyed we're doing the hard work for the scum.
[b]@Bloscovi[/b] Here's my opinion of that Kraj post:
[b]Vote: Kraj{/b]
[b]@Kraj, Proph, Brinatoo, Hunger[/b] Pick a number 1-25, there is likely a wrong answer, but there may not be a right answer. If you do not respond within your next two posts you will be voted for.
I have updated my notes, I want to see where this Kraj deal goes. I'm also interested in Matowar.
There is waaaaaay to much unprompted role info ITT. Loose lips sink ships, folks.
If nothing else, TS's tilting at windmills with Mindreaver has clarified my read of him.
@brinatoo(I think?) I didn't like the HWP wagon because it came and went so quickly.
The Ghosting wagon in my notes (which are not up to date because I've been busy) is two early votes, so I don't think that's what you're referring to. I'll reread at some point to fix that.
EBWDP: Also, I'm either going to be posting late at night (like right now) or in a short period of time while at work. If I don't post it's probably because I forgot.
So is it safe to assume you have read through the game more than a skim? I like the reasoning.
In the past, I've spent time analyzing tone of posts. I don't have the time for that anymore. I'm reading straight interactions (@ posts), votes and not much else. If there's something I miss it's because I don't have the time to pay super close attention.
That's dangerously close to a misrep. I voted Hardwood, yes, but I think on a reread of the actual vote, that I wasn't being serious (still being barely out of RVS at the time, if [left]we were even out). Even if he did intentionally waste my time with that poem, how could I possibly think that would be alignment indicative?
I was, and currently still am, voting TS. But that's my first serious vote of the whole game. To say "very willing to casually move his vote between them" is a HUGE stretch. Especially since that makes it sound like I voted more than twice.
I considered GJ's vote on Hardwood the first "serious" vote of the game. You had already gotten your RVS vote out of your system (on Proph, second post of the game) and were the 4th vote on Hardwood. It's not the reason for your vote that I don't like. It's the context of your vote along side your T_S vote.
Vote: Jobie Because it was a good idea in Mushroom Kingdom.
First off, I don't even remember Mushroom Kingdom, but looking at my stats it looks like that game started me on a 3 year losing streak... Great.
Second, the first RVS-style vote after RVS has started to end makes me sad and doesn't give me warm fuzzies.
Seppel when are you going to actually play the game?
Day 3.
This seems oddly optimistic by you Seppel. You sure you didn't mean Day 4?
RE: Our two wagons to date:
Hardwood: Hardwood got railed for tonal reasons which seemed weak at best. The pace of the wagon is interesting, 3 votes in 7 posts to bring H_P to 5 votes.
Tapping: Tapping gonna Tapping. I've done little more than skimming (CTRL+F "vote"; CTRL+F "Jobie" ad nauseam) but it seems like this wagon arose due to weak pretenses for a read made by Tapping
BONUS Wagon: Ghosting has received attention for being overly wordy in an explanation *yawn*
Vote: Mindreaver
Why Mindreaver if you have only skimmed, but don't agree with any of the wagons... ?
My vote is related to my pie-charty reads. Mindreaver was on both bad wagons and seemed very willing to casually move his vote between them.
Vote: Jobie Because it was a good idea in Mushroom Kingdom.
First off, I don't even remember Mushroom Kingdom, but looking at my stats it looks like that game started me on a 3 year losing streak... Great.
Second, the first RVS-style vote after RVS has started to end makes me sad and doesn't give me warm fuzzies.
Seppel when are you going to actually play the game?
Day 3.
This seems oddly optimistic by you Seppel. You sure you didn't mean Day 4?
RE: Our two wagons to date:
Hardwood: Hardwood got railed for tonal reasons which seemed weak at best. The pace of the wagon is interesting, 3 votes in 7 posts to bring H_P to 5 votes.
Tapping: Tapping gonna Tapping. I've done little more than skimming (CTRL+F "vote"; CTRL+F "Jobie" ad nauseam) but it seems like this wagon arose due to weak pretenses for a read made by Tapping
BONUS Wagon: Ghosting has received attention for being overly wordy in an explanation *yawn*
/Head desk
I'm not a huge fan of noob clearing. However, I meant Mindreaver, I read the wrong row of my spreadsheet.
unvote, Vote: Mindreaver
As for not lynching me, there are people that have actually been scummy (Kraj and Matowar, for example) and have some small consensus regarding their scumminess.
Also, I don't do T/S lists on Day 1. I might as well try to break dance for all the good/value it would do the game.
Also, the seriousness of my # question did not turn out as I hoped. I think this lends credence to the "Iso doesn't want/like mod-gaming". Hunger's lack of desire to answer annoys me, I could be swayed towards voting him.
Can you point to my dismissal of the Ghosting wagon, because I don't remember doing that?
Or it's the fact that I've seen games go sideways did to role discussions that are highly unprompted. Some of my best games as scum occurred because of subtle discussions narrowing down who has PRs and who doesnt. ITT it isn't even subtle. So I'm more annoyed we're doing the hard work for the scum.
[b]Vote: Kraj{/b]
[b]@Kraj, Proph, Brinatoo, Hunger[/b] Pick a number 1-25, there is likely a wrong answer, but there may not be a right answer. If you do not respond within your next two posts you will be voted for.
I have updated my notes, I want to see where this Kraj deal goes. I'm also interested in Matowar.
There is waaaaaay to much unprompted role info ITT. Loose lips sink ships, folks.
I will reread in the next 24-48 hours and get back to all y'all.
If nothing else, TS's tilting at windmills with Mindreaver has clarified my read of him.
@brinatoo(I think?) I didn't like the HWP wagon because it came and went so quickly.
The Ghosting wagon in my notes (which are not up to date because I've been busy) is two early votes, so I don't think that's what you're referring to. I'll reread at some point to fix that.
I considered GJ's vote on Hardwood the first "serious" vote of the game. You had already gotten your RVS vote out of your system (on Proph, second post of the game) and were the 4th vote on Hardwood. It's not the reason for your vote that I don't like. It's the context of your vote along side your T_S vote.
However...
My vote is related to my pie-charty reads. Mindreaver was on both bad wagons and seemed very willing to casually move his vote between them.
First off, I don't even remember Mushroom Kingdom, but looking at my stats it looks like that game started me on a 3 year losing streak... Great.
Second, the first RVS-style vote after RVS has started to end makes me sad and doesn't give me warm fuzzies.
This seems oddly optimistic by you Seppel. You sure you didn't mean Day 4?
RE: Our two wagons to date:
Hardwood: Hardwood got railed for tonal reasons which seemed weak at best. The pace of the wagon is interesting, 3 votes in 7 posts to bring H_P to 5 votes.
Tapping: Tapping gonna Tapping. I've done little more than skimming (CTRL+F "vote"; CTRL+F "Jobie" ad nauseam) but it seems like this wagon arose due to weak pretenses for a read made by Tapping
BONUS Wagon: Ghosting has received attention for being overly wordy in an explanation *yawn*
Vote: Mindreaver
/In