2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on The Truth About HELL!!! *gasp*
    ahhh, good old christianity, always a laugh.

    I really can't tell whether or not his is a joke. It certainly doesn't fail to use the "religious-propaganda-website-attention-grab" technique of changing text size every couple lines.

    seriously, this is just plain ridiculous, i hope this hasn't caused anyone to convert.
    Posted in: the Speakeasy
  • posted a message on Soul Market V: Run by Kankennon
    good to see that what i started about 4 or 5 years ago on MTGnews is still around (I was baal)

    I will bid some potatoes. Some are boiled, some are mashed, and others are stuck into a stew.
    Posted in: Other Forum Games
  • posted a message on A crazy storm idea that needs a deck to go along with it
    wow, i didn't know that kind of deck would actually be competitive.

    I certainly agree that there should be an extract in the SB for oath.
    Posted in: Casual & Multiplayer Formats
  • posted a message on A crazy storm idea that needs a deck to go along with it
    This is a completely casual idea and is no way intended to be seen anywhere NEAR a tournament.

    2 Sensei's Divining Top
    Helm of awakening
    some storm card

    Infinitely large storm.

    I'm in the process of making a deck to go along with this, any suggestions would be welcome.
    Posted in: Casual & Multiplayer Formats
  • posted a message on [SoK] Oppressed Will
    Personall, I would call fake on this.

    I looked into the artist and saw that Pat Lee is a comic book artist, although this alone does not deem the card fake since Kev Walker does magic art too. My guess is that like other fakers, this card has been fabricated using a piece of art by the artist credited. While searching for information on the artist, I could find no indication of any work done for anything other than comics. I propose that whoever created this card found a piece of art that appeared in a comic illustrated by Pat Lee and decided it could work for a counter.

    I'm not saying i'm right, it's just a guess.

    Apart from that, this card is pretty bad. If it is real, then WOTC is really teasing us with sub-par counterspells. Just bring back the real thing!
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Post March Metagame
    I would have to agree that the banning of artifact lands was extremely unnecessary. This banning did not only ruin ravager, but decks such as KCI, which didn't have any warping effect on the format. A far more appropriate thing to ban would have been plating, but now even it is largely useless thanks to the banning of the arti lands.

    That being said, the demise of ravager will certainly have an interesting effect on the format. I'm sure that there will be some new deck types on the rise that would otherwise have been unrealistic. This has significantly slowed the format down, which can allow for some more interesting, perhaps even some combo, decks.
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on Meandeck Oath
    What do you typically intuition for? I'm thinking of building an oath deck, but i'm not sure what the best combinations to grab are.
    Posted in: Vintage Archives
  • posted a message on What lands will there be in 9th?
    I'd love to see some playable multilands in the base set; either pains or fetches. I'd also like to see enemy-fetches and enemy-pains come back, but that's not going to happen. Being the pessimist i voted for the invasion CIPT lands, as that's most likely what we're going to get.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on 9th Chase Rare Speculation
    Personally, I would highly doubt wrath being removed from the base set. This would be a very strange move by WotC, as it is a staple (then again, they killed all the other ones) and I'm sure alot of players would not approve. Perhaps Wizards are trying to separate the "advanced" from the "expert" sets a bit more, moving the cards that see serious play to the "expert" level sets and gearing the core sets more towards the players who are still learning.

    As for the chase rare in 9th, I would assume it to be wrath, and I'd be extremely surprised to see it go. It would be nice if they replaced those crappy invasion duals with some pains though.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on Loam Dweller
    If I have a loam dweller in play and I cast Kodama's reach, can I put the dweller's ability on the stack so that both lands end up in play? Or does the spiritcraft trigger go off right away?
    Posted in: Magic Rulings Archives
  • posted a message on Magic Workstation
    Where can I find Kamigawa block updates for workstation? I can only find sets up to fifth dawn.

    any help would be appreciated
    Posted in: Third Party Products
  • posted a message on [BOK] overall set quality
    i must say, the way this set is shaping up it's extremely disappointing. When I see something like a 3/3 for 7 with a junk ability, i really don't know what WOTC is thinking. I admit there are a few cool cards but the majority of this set is ridiculously underpowered.

    Anybody else feel this way or am I the only one?

    Edit: ok, not worst set ever, but an extremely disappointing set.

    on a more positive note, what do people expect to be the stronger cards in the set? which ones will see some serious play?
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on A few new cards
    Inquisitor's Orders W
    Instant
    Choose a card type, target player may not play cards of that type until end of turn.

    The Blasphemous Moon BBB
    Legendary enchantment
    Whenever a black creature comes into play under your control, target opponent discards a card

    Necro-Yeti 3BBB
    Creature- Beast
    If at end of turn no creatures are put into a graveyard from play, remove all +1/+1 counters from Necro-Yeti
    Whenever a creature is put into a graveyard from play, put a +1/+1 counter on Necro-Yeti.
    4/4

    And a fixed version of Mana drain

    Mana Syphon XUU
    Instant
    Counter target spell unless its controller pays X. If a spell is countered this way, add X to your mana pool during your next main phase

    One I made up a long time ago

    Phyrexian Tombs 2BB
    Legendary enchantment
    During each player's upkeep that player sacrifices a creature. Pay 5 life: destroy Phyrexian Tombs. Any player may play this ability.
    Posted in: Custom Card Creation
  • posted a message on A new mechanic
    Zeal (whenever this creature deals damage to a creature or player, you may divide it's combat damage between any number of creatures or players)

    Crusading Templar 1WW
    Creature- Human knight
    Zeal
    2/2

    I've done a bit of testing and this card seems fair. When my load of schoolwork has lessened, I'll continue testing as well as making some new ones.
    Posted in: Custom Card Creation
  • posted a message on [BOK] 3 of Frostling's cycle-siblings
    I'm really impressed that there will be a reprint of mogg fanatic, one of my favourite cards, as well as the white spore frog, this is certainly high quality.

    As for the blue one, my gueesses are; hapless researcher as a spirit or something similar (maybe just draw, that would be nice),, or something weak like flying until EOT.

    I'd certainly like to see a sac-for-force-spike creature as a 1 drop but I'm not holding my breath.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.