It's probably not best to guess. I definitely agree with you, but it's not unusual for Wizards to TRY to keep a cycle as similar as possible but still have to buf or nerf one of them because of power level.
In this case the blue "sacling" is perfectly ok at 1/1, I'd be willing to put up 100:1 odds to anyone who wants to make a wager . . . I'm that confident.
EDIT: cool Wildfire, well that can be taken off the list once it's updated.
Who cares? Has anyone noticed that a 3/3 for 3 with no drawbacks isn't too great? A 3/3 for 3 with drawbacks is aweful.
We are not talking about constructed here, we are talking about limited. That is where a 3/3 for 3 realy shines. I could see this shine in a R/B draft deck as a solid beater.
I had not noticed that, very nice. Bigest problem for constructed though is that first strike creatures are very white and ninjutsu is not. This means that it prob wont be an amazing trick in constructed, though I could see it coming in very usefull in a W/U or W/B limited deck.
I'm hoping for a rat with ninjutsu :1mana::symb: that has a cmc to cast. This would be very playable in constucted . . . why? . . . because I think 3rd turn Patron of the Nezumi would be fairly good, even against affinity.
EDIT:
Quote from paranoid »
It simply doesn't work. I can't really explain it since I don't know where it says so in the rulebook but I do know that it doesn't work... Sadly because it would've been sweet...
It does work, because the creature is a different creature it will work. What doesn't work is when you give a creature first stike, let it do its damage, remove first strike and expect it to do the damage again.
Well I just get on and I miss all the fun. But thanks Salubrious for the info, ya the gray is goodness. Also who thought "Night" would be a good idea, thats some weired ****.
First not saying the word salvation is not in there rules . . . I wish it was :whatever:. Second as far as I saw it we were against spaming up there forums . . . this would just be a link in the sig.
Well next thing they will need to censor is R_E and all versions of said name . . . including but not limited to rancor and elf, so you will see Wirewood ***.
Anyway can't someone make a page and have it auto link here to slavation.
Well I was looking throught the MTGNews spoiler . . . looking for a laugh and I came across:
Master of the Last Hour - [2][B]
Legendary Creature - Zombuie Wizard
[1][B]:Regenerate Master of the Last Hour.
[3][B][B]:Secriface Master of the Last Hour: Destory all nonblack creatures.
One of the most formidable foes of the kami, he oppesed them even in death.
2/2
Illus. Carl
Rare
well I was very amused . . . I started looking for the thread I had seen on this exact card on, didn't find it but I came across this page http://forums.mtgnews.com/showthread.php?t=190452 . . . wow . . . mtgnews wasn't censored :shocked2:.
Anyway this is very amusing, what happens when a new card comes out with salvation in the name, or ppl want to talk about old cards. :slant:
In this case the blue "sacling" is perfectly ok at 1/1, I'd be willing to put up 100:1 odds to anyone who wants to make a wager . . . I'm that confident.
EDIT: cool Wildfire, well that can be taken off the list once it's updated.
I have no "source of info"
But surely it is a 1/1 . . . it is part of a cycle. A 1/1 cycle . . .
We are not talking about constructed here, we are talking about limited. That is where a 3/3 for 3 realy shines. I could see this shine in a R/B draft deck as a solid beater.
I'm hoping for a rat with ninjutsu :1mana::symb: that has a cmc to cast. This would be very playable in constucted . . . why? . . . because I think 3rd turn Patron of the Nezumi would be fairly good, even against affinity.
EDIT:
It does work, because the creature is a different creature it will work. What doesn't work is when you give a creature first stike, let it do its damage, remove first strike and expect it to do the damage again.
Well I live in Auckland, New Zealand.
Also thanks TNK for the updates.
Well there's me so there is at least one other from New Zealand.
First not saying the word salvation is not in there rules . . . I wish it was :whatever:. Second as far as I saw it we were against spaming up there forums . . . this would just be a link in the sig.
Cha0s Finale
very cool
Anyway can't someone make a page and have it auto link here to slavation.
well I was very amused . . . I started looking for the thread I had seen on this exact card on, didn't find it but I came across this page http://forums.mtgnews.com/showthread.php?t=190452 . . . wow . . . mtgnews wasn't censored :shocked2:.
Anyway this is very amusing, what happens when a new card comes out with salvation in the name, or ppl want to talk about old cards. :slant:
Can a black knight like me find salvation? I certainly hope so because mtgnews is uncomfortly cold for a hell .
Well enough of that.
May the rumors flow and the forums be full.
Zentelm