Quote from SpEkKiO99Squadron Hawk had many predecessors that should also be allowed if your going to go there:
But then you are going down a slippery slope of how many of these types of cards to allow and also giving the list of these cards to everyone before a draft and remembering them during a draft.
I'm not going there, only 1 copy of each card in my cube.
Quote from TrunkersI just found the decisions less interesting with 4x4. Also, for 4 people Tenchester drafting is really good. Realllly good.
Quote from FoggManaticI'm not taking life advice from patrick chapin. I don't care about his opinion on words. My experience with actual rape is not a light one, and in fact is very close to home. I'm not down with the absurdly politically correct, and over-sensitive Bull**** that seems to be so prevalent these days. Formerly 'negative' words are now 'positive' and vice versa. It just can't matter that much.
Words mean things, yes, but words don't harm me, because I'm not a child. I can say Boros charm is a great card, and it means the same thing and everyone knows that. Speaking of which, the disk interaction is absurd, and is my first and foremost post-GTC goal.
Quote from HichamI think I still value Sphinx of Jar-Jar higher. He is so thrustworhty. A lot of decks just cannot handle a big flying shroud creature.
To be as thrustworhty I would need to have 7 mana to play this guy.
Sure this guy can bash for 8, but he dodges removal by not dealing combat damage, which kind of sucks. I understand that he has the big upside of surviving Wraths but generally you are the one playing those anyway.