well that last one does in a way. Aggro and combo decks have their own processes that replace some of the above.
1. Aggro decks for the most part ignore card advantage, stack interactions, and the late game. Combo and control tend to ignore combat and early momentum while focusing a lot on the stack.
2. Aggro and combo decks should not struggle in this department either.
3. Is actually a lot easier for aggro/combo than it is for control, but is valid for all 3.(similar to 2)
4. For example an aggro deck won't technically see more cards than any other deck. However aggro decks will typically see more gas cards per capita than a control deck. control decks have higher land counters, slower cards, and incorrect answers. So the aggro deck by being aggressive and ending the game fast. Combo is quite similar in this way.
- slipknot72102
- Registered User
-
Member for 14 years, 3 months, and 23 days
Last active Mon, May, 11 2015 22:40:57
- 1 Follower
- 5,933 Total Posts
- 7 Thanks
-
Feb 1, 2012slipknot72102 posted a message on 4 Leaf Clover(how to leave luck behind)Posted in: slipknot72102 Blog
-
Feb 1, 2012slipknot72102 posted a message on Lucky 7: Invalidating luckBut just ignoring luck and focusing on what you can do will give you "better luck" in the future which is the point behind this.Posted in: slipknot72102 Blog
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Fourth Amendment. Looking through phones records and emails easily falls within "unreasonable searches". They do this without warrants and without "probable cause".
"In Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967), the Supreme Court ruled that a search occurs when 1) a person expects privacy in the thing searched and 2) society believes that expectation is reasonable."
Slightly off topic, but If i was obama I would be going after them too. They are radical fundamentalist with agendas aimed at regressing our lives back into their utopia. The hints of racism, and hatred are kinda hard to miss. It would be like giving a group that followed the Nazism beliefs tax exemption.
sometime you should look at the science portion of reddit. It would amaze you what we find each day that isn't reported on mainstream news. Currently 2 different batteries are being tested which are both cheaper and better than the current ones in use. None of this was actually funded by tesla. Now once someone patents it we will have to see how expensive they get and stuff, but hopefully it will be an open patent since it is for the good of mankind as a whole.
As far as a time frame and cost of an entry level Tesla model in the future who knows. So many variables exist like fights with the dealerships and with lobbyist who will try to make these cars more expensive(or force excessive taxes on them or something)
However I am willing to believe that unless something happens in the next 10 years a fully electric car could easily be in the 15k to 20k price point...then again I may be an optimist.
I wanted to comment on this. There is evidence that through hard study you can improve your scores. We have landed objects on mars and currently plan on landing people thus we have evidence that it is possible. As far as aliens go most scientist will say that with what we currently know it is almost impossible that aliens don't exist somewhere in the universe. Most are skeptical that we have actually be in contact with them in any form though.
There is a theory that if god is everywhere and contributes to our lives as much as some believe then we would have found evidence by now. This is the same theory that disproves bigfoot. If these creatures did exist then why do we not find concrete evidence for it? Remains or fossil records, something we can bank on. Its not too say that it won't happen and 100% that god and big foot don't exist, but that it isn't logically or statistically probable.
Occam's razor states that the simplest most logical explanation for something is most likely the truth. Currently it is easier to believe the universe created itself through some process we don't know or understand instead of believing that some creator just existed magically and magically created the universe.
wiccan is a form of paganism that does not believe in a god thus all wiccans are atheist. atheism is not believing in a god however you got there. You can have religion and still be an atheist.
For example in other parts of the world where religion is not as dominant children even older children have not heard of theism. I have seen several stories and such were at the age of 10(or even later) children are first introduced to theism. This is when they learn that they have no belief of god although it was there the whole time.
The more cars they sell the cheaper these cars will become because of availability. For example the first Blu-ray players were hundreds of dollars and now you can get one for like $50. Electric cars are the future as long as they don't run into road blocks from the NADA and other lobby groups.(like those for oil and gas)
Virginia, Texas, SC, so far with more litigation on the dockets of several other states. This could be a case for all 50 states soon enough....except for probably cali. I don't see them trying to stop this for obvious reasons.
The theory or belief that God does not exist.
No child believes in god until they are force fed by parents. Atheism can in fact be "not having any religious stance". Other forms of atheism exist like some forms of paganism and non-theistic religions. Atheism is a rather large term that can be split into several other related terms.
all children are born atheist. So it is actually impossible to indoctrinate them into atheism....although IMO you can't indoctrinate a lack of beliefs since that is what atheism is.
@OP
IMO it is wrong to force children to believe in any religion or not to believe in a religion until they are mature enough to make decisions for themselves. One of the tele-evangelist said it best when he said we need to get them when they are young and make them believe.(because this is the only time they are vulnerable to believe in our crazy stories)
The part in "()" is my on addition of what he was really saying.
we have studies showing the exact opposite of these too. We have studies that show that atheist are actually more moral and less likely to commit crimes. Any single small survey or study should be questioned for validity.
The patriot act essentially gave FISA a little more room to be more invasive. It is the type of law that is so gray it could almost be used for anything.
Other than the fact that the more they watch us the more "witch hunting" as you called it will happen. While it has nothing to do with government the novel 1984 is a perfect example of how technology could move forward enough to allow people to access our thought and punish us for them. I understand this is somewhat a slippery slope, however one day we could be arrested for thinking about killing someone or for lusting over someone. Will it ever get this far? Probably not however is it necessary to go as far as we have gone. I mean the FBI does want backdoors into all communications taking place.
The other big reason one could have a problem with the current policies is the cost. Instead of spending all of this extra money spying on people most of whom are law abiding citizens we could be creating entry level jobs or helping those who are struggling to get back on their feet with education or job training.
Again bringing up this rhetoric despite the fact that NO ONE IN CONGRESS IS TAKING AWAY YOUR RIGHT TO PROTECT YOURSELF IN THE UNLIKELY CIRCUMSTANCE THAT YOU ACTUALLY NEED TO USE DEADLY FORCE.
That being said another point I would like to make that pertains more to the thread although it is somewhat related to what I posted above is where we draw the line.
In one circumstance it is perfectly acceptable to take someones life. However this is only if you would prevent them from intentionally taking other lives.(or your own)
This is contrary to most religious beliefs and I understand that.(for instance wearing mixed fabrics is a death sentence in the bible) However we don't need old books or old "codes of law" to have morality. We as a society should be able to easily find morality. For instance a person who we can prove without a shadow of doubt committed murder(s) should only be put to death IF we have no way to prevent future killings from this person. This is just not the case in the united states. We can lock someone in a high security prison and pretty much guarantee they will kill no one else.
This is why I am against capital punishment. Remember that in other countries being gay or poking holes in a common religious belief can lead to capital punishment. Keep that in mind when you argue for these measures.
Honestly a lot of this we have brought upon ourselves with bigotry and fear of anything and everything. This is just another never ending war against shadows. IMO this will be our downfall.
Their sales model is to make the vehicles then have their own dealerships set up. This is where the point of contention is. Apparently somehow it is unlawful for manufacturers to sell their own vehicles independently of car dealerships.
To me this seems backwards, moronic, and kinda typical of the capitalist way. The National Automobile Dealers Association is apparently pissed because without going through a third party these cars are less costly for the people.
Am I the only one who is pissed about this? Is there some intrinsic value from forcing car manufacturers to go through private dealers?
what if the child lost their mental health after being an adult? My parents are no longer responsible for me as I am an adult. What if I was to freak out and murder a bunch of people? So their fault huh?
Lies. Only a small portion of conservative groups were actually targeted. Several conservative groups got the typical free pass(which IMO is bad as all groups should have to prove that they deserve tax exempt status)
Of the conservative groups that were "targeted" not a single one was denied once they got all of the requested paper work in. At least one liberal organization was denied for what ever reason. Several other liberal groups also had to disclose donors and such(which is what was requested of the "targeted" conservative groups)
Source for this. Some other news sites and stuff list others, but the washingtonpost is pretty damn trustworthy.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/05/15/report-the-irs-also-targeted-at-least-three-liberal-groups/
EDIT: I again am of the opinion that all groups(churches included) should have to go through many checks and measures before getting tax exempt.(although I will say that IMO churches are a multi-billion dollar a year for profit business and should be tax accordingly)
several people who have been scheduled for execution have been proven innocent due to the appeals process we currently have. If we didn't execute a single guilty person to guarantee that one or more innocent people don't get murdered then it's worth it IMO. Yes I said murder because that is what it is.