#179 - Kill Joy gives LoT town points.
#229 - Commentary on Void being likely town (or possibly neutral. Woo, fearmongering)
#519 - Votes Void because...
Quote from Kill Joy »
The way this is worded, you seem to be trying to paint LoT's decision that Seppel is town because he killed scum as a bad thing. No, Seppel is not CONFIRMED, sure. But what other conclusion should we come to for someone on D1 who killed a scum?
This all just feels like you're trying to take town points from people who earned them, is what I'm trying to say.
Chainsaw defending flipped scum onto someone he'd conceeded was probably town due to effort/mindset earlier in the game is yeah.
Vote: KillJoy
This is a sound observation. Hard to say when we'll hear from killjoy on the subject though...he's not exactly been posting up a storm lately (not that I have much room to talk).
The sugar on top is that his defense was incredibly weak; attacking the "feel" of Void's post, and even feeling the need to decode his reasoning with a "is what I'm trying to say."
On a related note, does the person who blocked me last night want to claim? I'm willing to listen to you too, although there is a distinct possibility I will want to lynch you afterwards.
Why make this public? I know you explained that you didn't expect anybody to step forward, but I don't see the logic for offering this information so immediately. Seems like a useful thing to keep close to your chest as a trap possibility, and also keeps you from giving away information about your night.
I'll claim responsibility for Anaklusmos' body last night.
I am not a/the full/unlimited vig, though. Don't wish to claim anything beyond that.
I'd like to hear from AlphaInsidous on Vox's claim.
It would seem to place Vox in a position of likely town or SK. I don't see mafia claiming their kill regardless of the situation; compounded by the fact that Vox went from denying his hand in the kill to making it public knowledge in 6 posts flat, simply because a few voices asked the party to claim.
Doesn't make sense from a mafia perspective to me.
I am Winston Churchill, vanilla town.
I led Britain against Hitler during WWII, was friends with Franklyn Roosevelt, and now must lead Britain once again to victory.
Well, that does little to change anything. Vanilla claim, yadda yadda.
The misspelling doesn't really bother me as much as the brevity of this claim post does, after not posting for 6 days and merely popping in to lay down the bare minimum.
And he's hasn't responded to anything after that claim. I get the feeling LoT feels the less he says at this point, the better.
* I want to lynch Voxx because he wanted to lynch LoT for the same reasons he himself posted.
* I want to lynch Voxx because more than 20% of his posts are stalling.
* I want to lynch Voxx because he'd rather lynch Eron, who he says he's slightly convicted on, above Killjoy, Robroy, and LoT, who he has mentioned as scumreads, but never made any attempt to push them or case them.
* I want to lynch Voxx because he said there was no alternative lynch, when he had plenty of scumreads.
Unvote, vote Voxxicus
This is a pretty solid case, especially the parallels between LoT's and Vox' post regarding EtR. I'd like to hear Vox' response to it.
I understand your reasoning, but I don't think it matches with the kill as a null tell. Consider that you say it doesn't make Seppel 100 percent town, which I and most people seem to agree with, along with the fact that you are leaning town on Seppel yourself. If the kill is a complete null tell for you, what leads to your leaning town read?
But what other conclusion should we come to for someone on D1 who killed a scum?
That it is an almost completely null tell...
That's a pretty absurd statement. What do you base it on? It's not like LoT was on the verge of being lynched.
Let me be clear, the possibility of Seppel replacing in and shooting a buddy for town points exists, but should be remote enough to push it far above a null tell.
You are very eager to know why you are name-claiming, but not interested enough to refuse Seppel. Why are you so interested in appeasing the request of one person?
Because the request came from town, so complying is helping a townie to further their understanding of the game. That can only help the town. I'm eager to know why simply because it bothers me that people are seeing things that I'm not, and it's a bit frustrating to me that I can't figure it out.
While it's much more likely than not that Seppel is town, I really don't buy your reasoning as coming from a town perspective. You're just coming across as trying to be cooperative, and it smells of inside information on Seppel to boot.
These last few posts from EtR feel so sincere, I'm a little afraid of the outcome of this lynch. But in a sense, EtR himself is keeping my vote on him. He's right in saying that we have no other clear suspects. Certainly nobody with a great case made against them. The only thing in the past few posts from EtR that I don't like is him saying that it would be okay if I died, but I think that's just because I don't want to die. I'm not sure what my point really is here, as I've been drinking a bit tonight, but mostly I just wanted to put it out there that the last few posts from EtR are making me a bit nervous.
Oh gosh, can you get more fence-sitty? What's that saying about alcohol lowering your inhibitions? Think we're witnessing an implosion.
On top of this sudden offering up of himself by LoT, I'll note that EtR's behavior here is not matching what I've seen from scum EtR in recent games. Despite a clear tone of him sounding defeated, he hasn't self-voted or conceded that the jig is up.
He's genuinely upset that his case was *about* to do him in.
We've plenty of time to turn this around, and gain information on EtR as well if LoT flips scum.
I'll claim now and answer any outstanding questions later when I'm at a PC.
I am Hideki Tojo, Vanilla Town.
Flavor wise you might remember me as the PM and military leader of Japan from WWII. I was executed for my part in the war when it was all said and done.
Ultimately, I loved my country and the people of Japan. I was hoping that this gathering of FHF would be my chance at redemption.
That's rather uninspiring...
I'm sure you know that, but still. Can't say that changes my vote.
1. I'm not really into the idea of claiming right now unless you can expand on your reasoning for asking me to. Also, if I'm going to name-claim, we might as well have a mass name-claim.
No, it specifically relates to you, and could help me figure out a very key point about this game.
Nameclam, please.
(this may later be expanded into a mass-name claim, but one name is good enough for now)
B'seder. My character is Winston Churchill. Am I going to be let in on why I'm claiming though?
You are very eager to know why you are name-claiming, but not interested enough to refuse Seppel. Why are you so interested in appeasing the request of one person?
Oddly enough your blatant refusal to comply to a simple request makes me think you're more likely town than not.
Where this:
Quote from AlphaInsidious »
How magnanimous of you.
Quote from AlphaInsidious »
Besides breathing?
generates the opposite reaction.
My post to you was not regarding your request of Rick Santorum, but rather you telling the rest of the game that they could comment on those players only after Rick did. It felt an awful lot like you were dictating who could speak their mind, which I don't particularly take kindly too.
Especially considering you had a long list of players there.
As for the second part, are you calling it out because you think I was making a joke or being indignant? Because it's definitely one of the two.
You've been gone for 4 days and conveniently you post after the daykill has gone through. How's it feel to get PM notification that your buddy died?
Not that I think you're scum or anything... but has the mod ever PM'd you to announce the death of a teammate?
Nope. I slung mud at Alpha. Instead, I should have called him out on his lurking.
Well, you called me out on lurking too. Which again, shouldn't surprise you.
And it's not even meta...if you can find a game where I didn't lurk, that would be impressive. I don't do it intentionally, it's just hard to find the time to be as prolific as most players are these days.
That being said, it's been a long time since my lurking has caused replacement, so I feel it's not detrimental. Feel free to let me know if you think it is.
Regarding my "defeatism". It was more that I was just Pi**ed off. I put some effort into that post on Rhand and everyone thinks it's garbage. I was actually kind of happy with it. Keep in mind we were only a couple hundred posts in, so it's not like he could have killed Lincoln yet. I was working with what I had and my previous experience.
Working hard on a post doesn't make it necessarily good reasoning or laudable.
You are also being hyperbolic saying "everyone" thinks it's "garbage." This is a game of picking apart people, and people picking apart cases, as you well know. To be so upset over a few people panning your case to the point of throwing in the towel seems overly dramatic.
Quote from EtR »
@Wessel - Do I still think that Rhand is scum? Yes, I do. The main reason that I wouldn't would be his interactions with Captain T. But my thoughts there are that he wouldn't think anything of bussing a buddy this early on day one. That kill was certainly unexpected. He had plenty of time to back off his buddy...Oh wait, he already did but also claims that Captain T had unanswered questions. Overall, I don't like his play so far.
You seem to contradict your own thoughts here. Why entertain his interactions as absolving him, just to say that he was more than likely bussing?
I have been thinking about what the others said about your play and slept on it. I believe I've been tunneling you. I've been operating on a "guilty until proven innocent" principle which is terrible, since there's about 3/4ths of the town that are innocent. Looking at you from an "innocent until proven guilty" view, your posts read extremely new player. I can't be positive you're not scum, but that doesn't mean I need to tunnel you, since if you are scum, you'll slip up later. Unvote
Do you typically start from a "guilty until proven innocent" principle when judging people?
Massive town points for Rhand, not even counting EtR's poor and strangely persistent case on him.
This doesn't seem like a question from Rhand that a buddy would ask, since it's designed to invite outside pressure.
Looking back, Tyzmo's post doesn't even make any sense. He even calls 3/4 of "the town" innocent, which now seems like an obvious slip. Considering he was referencing Lennonmint, that also bodes well for him.
I don't consider inconsistency to strictly be irrelevant based on experience. But, other factors are making me reconsider your motive.
My motive? Enlighten me.
Simply put, I'm trying to separate your whimsy from filler. One side is just your personality, while the other could be subtly nefarious; hence, motive.
Or, even more plainly stated, I suspect that you are playing up the reputation you've gained in your short time playing this game for the town points others are giving you.
Do town claim this defense anymore? Seems I rarely see it.
It's a pretty safe play, I'll grant EtR. You have an out no matter how you interpret "the reaction". If you see something you can attack, then you do so, and if the reaction is milquetoast, no harm and no foul. After all, you weren't attacking him for real...just gauging his reaction!
I believe your post changed how Lennon was reacting and now that you have unvote Lennon makes me believe the two of you are know more about this game than the rest of the town.
So now you think that both of us are scum? I could have found his reaction to be more townie, and have unvoted him as such. Why specifically is that coaching, especially since if we were scumbuddies, I could have done that out of thread?
So the scum have daytalk?
The fact that Mr. Santorum jumps to the conclusion that Anak is talking about Day Chat without any sort of reference to when the scum can talk is a jump in logic.
So...how is the bolded above not a clear reference to when the scum can talk? It seems pretty evident that Anak was presupposing a situation where he and Lennon are mafia members.
I also feel that Void, and others didn't take the smiley as an indicator of Rick Santorum not being entirely accusatory. Which is strange.
The fact that Mr. Santorum jumps to the conclusion that Anak is talking about Day Chat without any sort of reference to when the scum can talk is a jump in logic. The catch of the slip without a vote doesn't mesh up together. Based on this posting from Mr. Santorum and the lack of voting I would believe him to be a good candidate (no pun intended :laugh:) of being a scum buddy to Anak.
Void, here you have Anak, Lennon and Rick Santorum as scum. Who else would you peg as their buddies? Finding all of the scum Day 1 would be awesome.
It's difficult to peg the tone of the last part of Tyzmo's post. Is he showing reverence to Void's opinions? Or is this him trying to mock Void's choices?
I don't see any indicators that would tell me he's being sarcastic, so I'm going to assume the former.
Town (may need to double check these with Iso's flip) TJ (innocent posting)
So these are your only mentions of Teh_JeY in your notes, though there aren't accompanying post numbers, with the overall conclusion being town due to innocent posting.
Can you give any more explanation?
Especially considering her latest post has some of the most blatant Seppel sucking up I've seen in some time.
Seppel is clearly on another spectrum from me - grand newbie compard to what appears to be a grand ruler. Okay, maybe that's a bit much, but I like quite a lot in your catch-up post (Except where you shortened me to "TJ", I'd rather much prefer JeY as I've explicitly noted before >_> sorry if I seem angry, I take names seriously). You know a lot about other games and therefore experience and I'm like a little bunny just looking for delishush carrots. I'll find them eventually!
Not to mention her pushing the innocence factor into super-megan-foxy-awesome-hot overdrive with her bunny talk.
Wow. Who else but Seppel? *Sitcom jingle*
I was just posting to check in quickly since I'm running to work. That's quite the entrance!
I should have a longer post up by Wednesday night.
It takes a kill to get you to post?
You've been gone for 4 days and conveniently you post after the daykill has gone through. How's it feel to get PM notification that your buddy died?
You also welcomed me in your previous post.
Ah, so apparently is has been too long since we've last played. You've forgotten that 4 days absences from me are exceedingly common. As in, say, the very last game I played.
I planned to make a check-in post before I took my pre-work shower, and now came out to see your latest post. I can't help the timing.
I'm not going to pile on with a vote at this point, but I would like to hear more from Swishh regarding his comment.
EtR]Hmmm. I didn't vote because I didn't think it was really worthy of a vote. I didn't see the action as scummy but was interested in his thoughts from the statement.
And furthermore, I don't see these 2 posts jiving here from EtR. From starting your response to Vox with "Hmmm", it stood out as you being careful, and then you go on to say you didn't think it was worthy of a vote.
But I see your statement about not wanting to pile on "at this point" to mean that you didn't vote only because it would be seen as piling on, not because you didn't think it was unwarranted.
That's your last bit of analysis (on the 17th) other than talking with TJ for your remaining two posts and dropping a question to Tzymo that went nowhere.
This is a bizarre release of pressure from Eron, who is so obviously scum now that he needs to be lynched now, no questions asked. You should know better than to think that everything makes sense in these Eron quotes.
You will be lynched Day 2.
By release of pressure, you mean what? You've obviously misread my post, which is calling out the fact that ETR was being inconsistent, and also self-conscious with his "piling on" comment.
And now, if you don't mind, I'd like to not be late for my shift.
Wow. Who else but Seppel? *Sitcom jingle*
I was just posting to check in quickly since I'm running to work. That's quite the entrance!
I should have a longer post up by Wednesday night.
Captain t and alpha, what are your definitions of the word 'flailing'?
To me, it's typically a deviation from their normal posting style and/or clear desperation tactics. I really didn't see anything changing from post to post for Lennon, nor did his posting feel desperate.
I'm actually liking Teh JeY's posts so far. She's been posting a lot, and I'm not getting the feeling that she is taking much time to consider her posts before throwing them out there. That strikes me as more of a townie mindset, or a very comfortable scum. The wildcard in this is that she obviously has outside experience.
Why do you say she obviously has outside experience? I have no experience playing with her, but she does mention that she's never played before:
Forgive me, it's been never since I last played this >_>
I'm surprised it took so long for someone to actually catch/interpret that. AlphaInsidious, as I've seen referenced as simply AI, guess you're just more observant. Nice. Though, have played or not played is not entirely definitive, right? I mean, there were a few claims that I'm new to here, not Mafia.
You're right that there are different levels. Having played on a different site, for example, would make you experienced, but not used to the particular style of play on this website.
I have to say, your stream of consciousness posting is making it difficult for me to discern what you mean.
But, can you tell me why you would think RobRoy would be voting Lennon simply because he hadn't posted? Was pretty early in the game, and he wasn't the only one with low or no posts.
Not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing!
Umm... No idea. First thing that popped into my head, really. Decided 'why not'.
Hmm. Okay. So I'm getting that you've been quick to offer theories as they occur to you. Which does jive with your posting thus far.
The point I was making was that you had nothing to add (supposedly), but then suddenly did not long after, without pointing out the motive you claimed you wanted to see. It was the inconsistency that caught my eye, not the vote.
I'm not entirely sure I follow this. Elaborate for clarity's sake?
Oh, I read it again , I get it now. silly me. I don't know what you want me to add about this having discussed that initial post already, I already said the first post was made for the sake of making a post, of course it's inconsistent. The flak for it however has taught me a valuable lesson.
Now this is the post that a new player makes, so that meshes, at least.
Agreed that her unique posting style has made it less likely to be contrived. And I believe that she believes what she's saying.
But that doesn't make her inconsistent actions any less noteworthy.
...I thought this would make more sense now that the cat's out of the bag (me being new), but I guess not.
I don't consider inconsistency to strictly be irrelevant based on experience. But, other factors are making me reconsider your motive.
Oops, missed the bluff calling - actually I thought it was because Lennon never posted still - I checked the entire topic previous to that post 2-3 times and didn't see his name, but he actually had one tiny post so meh. By the time I realized it, I found a much better engage to pursue.
I have to say, your stream of consciousness posting is making it difficult for me to discern what you mean.
But, can you tell me why you would think RobRoy would be voting Lennon simply because he hadn't posted? Was pretty early in the game, and he wasn't the only one with low or no posts.
Like I said, there were three really good accusations started, but if I had nothing to add, why post at all? Perhaps I was a bit excited to play, but yeesh a costly mistake for such a trivial emotion. Still, I wasn't going to sit for long.
The point I was making was that you had nothing to add (supposedly), but then suddenly did not long after, without pointing out the motive you claimed you wanted to see. It was the inconsistency that caught my eye, not the vote.
Quote from Teh_JeY »
The worst thing is these attacks barely warrant anything scum-worthy to mention. Of course the fence-sit post went ignored for a while but a person without too many previous posts in the discussion brings it up, followed by two more people without too many previous posts, hardly bandwagoning as opposed to staking a really good claim. Perhaps I'm missing something fishy?
These are strange points. What does my number of posts have to do with my analysis?
I also don't think you would be so self-aware of if you're being fishy or not as town.
I'm actually liking Teh JeY's posts so far. She's been posting a lot, and I'm not getting the feeling that she is taking much time to consider her posts before throwing them out there. That strikes me as more of a townie mindset, or a very comfortable scum. The wildcard in this is that she obviously has outside experience.
Why do you say she obviously has outside experience? I have no experience playing with her, but she does mention that she's never played before:
unvote Teh JeY. I think I misread her enthousiasm for nervousness.
The pressure didn't bring her off balance. The posting of her whole thought process makes what she types very hard to fake.
Agreed that her unique posting style has made it less likely to be contrived. And I believe that she believes what she's saying.
But that doesn't make her inconsistent actions any less noteworthy.
Quote from Wessel »
POST #169
Wessel had a lot of very interesting things to say in this post, and I found myself agreeing with much of it. I do disagree with his conclusions on Teh_JeY at this juncture however.
Let me remind you that the word 'reactions' exists. I was genuine when I said that something I wanted to see was missing in your post, and being claimed that it doesn't make sense feels like you're ignoring the point. Someone recently... seemed much less applicable by saying what you seem to be missing.
The whimsical strawberry nature of your posts aside, I'll need to get this on record. No skirting that you are simply looking for reactions. At the time you voted Cyouni, was it because you felt he was scum?
It was meant to mean that at this point I didn't see it necessary to vote, but depending on his response I may. I didn't see the comment as scummy but more curious. Being as this is Swishh's first game, I needed more before I considered placing a vote.
That's fair enough. That perspective at least helps me make sense of the dichotomy I saw.
I just want to get this clear. You all think Lennon is just a noob that's flailing? I mean, I can accept that I might be wrong, it was just that all his reactions seemed... off to me.
I fail...to see the flail. What about his reactions felt like scum flailing?
That's a far cry from "confirmed not SK".
Unvote: killjoy.
Didn't realize that would put him at L-1; reading the vote count is svg tech.
This is a sound observation. Hard to say when we'll hear from killjoy on the subject though...he's not exactly been posting up a storm lately (not that I have much room to talk).
The sugar on top is that his defense was incredibly weak; attacking the "feel" of Void's post, and even feeling the need to decode his reasoning with a "is what I'm trying to say."
Vote: Killjoy
Why make this public? I know you explained that you didn't expect anybody to step forward, but I don't see the logic for offering this information so immediately. Seems like a useful thing to keep close to your chest as a trap possibility, and also keeps you from giving away information about your night.
It would seem to place Vox in a position of likely town or SK. I don't see mafia claiming their kill regardless of the situation; compounded by the fact that Vox went from denying his hand in the kill to making it public knowledge in 6 posts flat, simply because a few voices asked the party to claim.
Doesn't make sense from a mafia perspective to me.
Please explain your reasoning here. You seeing Anak as scummy yesterday is not doing it for me.
Well, that does little to change anything. Vanilla claim, yadda yadda.
The misspelling doesn't really bother me as much as the brevity of this claim post does, after not posting for 6 days and merely popping in to lay down the bare minimum.
And he's hasn't responded to anything after that claim. I get the feeling LoT feels the less he says at this point, the better.
I missed that you mentioned Seppel's analysis, but it was an off-hand comment thrown in, and you didn't explain what you liked about his analysis.
This is a pretty solid case, especially the parallels between LoT's and Vox' post regarding EtR. I'd like to hear Vox' response to it.
You don't even mention the recent push on LoT. Where exactly do you see commitment to the EtR "pot" at this point?
I understand your reasoning, but I don't think it matches with the kill as a null tell. Consider that you say it doesn't make Seppel 100 percent town, which I and most people seem to agree with, along with the fact that you are leaning town on Seppel yourself. If the kill is a complete null tell for you, what leads to your leaning town read?
That's a pretty absurd statement. What do you base it on? It's not like LoT was on the verge of being lynched.
Let me be clear, the possibility of Seppel replacing in and shooting a buddy for town points exists, but should be remote enough to push it far above a null tell.
While it's much more likely than not that Seppel is town, I really don't buy your reasoning as coming from a town perspective. You're just coming across as trying to be cooperative, and it smells of inside information on Seppel to boot.
Oh gosh, can you get more fence-sitty? What's that saying about alcohol lowering your inhibitions? Think we're witnessing an implosion.
On top of this sudden offering up of himself by LoT, I'll note that EtR's behavior here is not matching what I've seen from scum EtR in recent games. Despite a clear tone of him sounding defeated, he hasn't self-voted or conceded that the jig is up.
He's genuinely upset that his case was *about* to do him in.
We've plenty of time to turn this around, and gain information on EtR as well if LoT flips scum.
Unvote EtR, Vote Lord of Tresserhorn
So...ignoring me, then?
That's rather uninspiring...
I'm sure you know that, but still. Can't say that changes my vote.
You are very eager to know why you are name-claiming, but not interested enough to refuse Seppel. Why are you so interested in appeasing the request of one person?
My post to you was not regarding your request of Rick Santorum, but rather you telling the rest of the game that they could comment on those players only after Rick did. It felt an awful lot like you were dictating who could speak their mind, which I don't particularly take kindly too.
Especially considering you had a long list of players there.
As for the second part, are you calling it out because you think I was making a joke or being indignant? Because it's definitely one of the two.
Well, you called me out on lurking too. Which again, shouldn't surprise you.
And it's not even meta...if you can find a game where I didn't lurk, that would be impressive. I don't do it intentionally, it's just hard to find the time to be as prolific as most players are these days.
That being said, it's been a long time since my lurking has caused replacement, so I feel it's not detrimental. Feel free to let me know if you think it is.
You didn't answer my questions to you about your read on Teh_JeY. Did you miss them, or are you willfully ignoring?
Emphasis mine. @Swishh - What is your end goal for being on this bandwagon? It doesn't sound like you are interested in a lynch.
Working hard on a post doesn't make it necessarily good reasoning or laudable.
You are also being hyperbolic saying "everyone" thinks it's "garbage." This is a game of picking apart people, and people picking apart cases, as you well know. To be so upset over a few people panning your case to the point of throwing in the towel seems overly dramatic.
You seem to contradict your own thoughts here. Why entertain his interactions as absolving him, just to say that he was more than likely bussing?
Vote: EtR
Massive town points for Rhand, not even counting EtR's poor and strangely persistent case on him.
This doesn't seem like a question from Rhand that a buddy would ask, since it's designed to invite outside pressure.
Looking back, Tyzmo's post doesn't even make any sense. He even calls 3/4 of "the town" innocent, which now seems like an obvious slip. Considering he was referencing Lennonmint, that also bodes well for him.
Simply put, I'm trying to separate your whimsy from filler. One side is just your personality, while the other could be subtly nefarious; hence, motive.
Or, even more plainly stated, I suspect that you are playing up the reputation you've gained in your short time playing this game for the town points others are giving you.
Do town claim this defense anymore? Seems I rarely see it.
It's a pretty safe play, I'll grant EtR. You have an out no matter how you interpret "the reaction". If you see something you can attack, then you do so, and if the reaction is milquetoast, no harm and no foul. After all, you weren't attacking him for real...just gauging his reaction!
So...how is the bolded above not a clear reference to when the scum can talk? It seems pretty evident that Anak was presupposing a situation where he and Lennon are mafia members.
I also feel that Void, and others didn't take the smiley as an indicator of Rick Santorum not being entirely accusatory. Which is strange.
It's difficult to peg the tone of the last part of Tyzmo's post. Is he showing reverence to Void's opinions? Or is this him trying to mock Void's choices?
I don't see any indicators that would tell me he's being sarcastic, so I'm going to assume the former.
So these are your only mentions of Teh_JeY in your notes, though there aren't accompanying post numbers, with the overall conclusion being town due to innocent posting.
Can you give any more explanation?
Especially considering her latest post has some of the most blatant Seppel sucking up I've seen in some time.
Not to mention her pushing the innocence factor into super-megan-foxy-awesome-hot overdrive with her bunny talk.
How magnanimous of you.
Besides breathing?
Ah, so apparently is has been too long since we've last played. You've forgotten that 4 days absences from me are exceedingly common. As in, say, the very last game I played.
I planned to make a check-in post before I took my pre-work shower, and now came out to see your latest post. I can't help the timing.
By release of pressure, you mean what? You've obviously misread my post, which is calling out the fact that ETR was being inconsistent, and also self-conscious with his "piling on" comment.
And now, if you don't mind, I'd like to not be late for my shift.
I was just posting to check in quickly since I'm running to work. That's quite the entrance!
I should have a longer post up by Wednesday night.
To me, it's typically a deviation from their normal posting style and/or clear desperation tactics. I really didn't see anything changing from post to post for Lennon, nor did his posting feel desperate.
You're right that there are different levels. Having played on a different site, for example, would make you experienced, but not used to the particular style of play on this website.
Hmm. Okay. So I'm getting that you've been quick to offer theories as they occur to you. Which does jive with your posting thus far.
Now this is the post that a new player makes, so that meshes, at least.
I don't consider inconsistency to strictly be irrelevant based on experience. But, other factors are making me reconsider your motive.
It's been a while, Seppel. Welcome!
I have to say, your stream of consciousness posting is making it difficult for me to discern what you mean.
But, can you tell me why you would think RobRoy would be voting Lennon simply because he hadn't posted? Was pretty early in the game, and he wasn't the only one with low or no posts.
The point I was making was that you had nothing to add (supposedly), but then suddenly did not long after, without pointing out the motive you claimed you wanted to see. It was the inconsistency that caught my eye, not the vote.
These are strange points. What does my number of posts have to do with my analysis?
I also don't think you would be so self-aware of if you're being fishy or not as town.
Why do you say she obviously has outside experience? I have no experience playing with her, but she does mention that she's never played before:
Agreed that her unique posting style has made it less likely to be contrived. And I believe that she believes what she's saying.
But that doesn't make her inconsistent actions any less noteworthy.
Wessel had a lot of very interesting things to say in this post, and I found myself agreeing with much of it. I do disagree with his conclusions on Teh_JeY at this juncture however.
Still, goodposting.
The whimsical strawberry nature of your posts aside, I'll need to get this on record. No skirting that you are simply looking for reactions. At the time you voted Cyouni, was it because you felt he was scum?
That's fair enough. That perspective at least helps me make sense of the dichotomy I saw.
I fail...to see the flail. What about his reactions felt like scum flailing?
Grats!