2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on Pick vs. Pick Thread [Alara Edition]
    Quote from Casual
    Those are the only ones I remember being tough picks.


    LOL I think it's safe to say that 60% of the tough picks in this format have to do specifically with oblivion ring.
    Posted in: Limited Archives
  • posted a message on pack 1 pick 1
    Still, you probably will open or get passed another oblivion ring, you are far less likely to obtain a kill condition than you are to obtain more removal.
    Posted in: Limited Archives
  • posted a message on pack 1 pick 1
    I would have taken predator dragon because he's a rare and I'm a raredrafter.

    But he also happens to be the right choice imo because predator dragon is a bomb and bombs are scarce in this format.

    It also makes sense to pick oblivion ring because that's the best removal and devour = card disadvantage. And you could devour a bunch of stuff and then get bone sharded or the like. I did that to someone's devour 3 creature this week at fnm after he sacked everything to it. That felt good.

    Still, oblivion ring is not a rare.
    Posted in: Limited Archives
  • posted a message on [MMO] Are we getting a MTG MMO?
    I think a Magic MMO would be lame, and mtgo needs attention and might suffer because of it.

    I like magic as a ccg better, but I guess I can see the market for an mmo.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on [CON] 2nd set in Alara block: Conflux
    Quote from NuTamFu
    Could the progression work the other way?

    Shards = 3 colors
    Conflux = 2 colors
    3rd = "single color"


    This would be awesome. I hope it's this.
    Posted in: Rumor Mill Archive
  • posted a message on [ALA] The Structure of Alara
    especially if those deckbuilding restrictions are true.


    What deckbuilding restrictions?
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Uberboys destroying FNM for local shops
    I have never head the term uberboy or uberjerk outside of this thread. Did the op make it up?
    Posted in: Magic General
  • posted a message on stupid unfair PTQ
    LOL, how would you even be able to communicate with the players and judges? You probably don't speak Chinese. I have always wondered this about playing overseas.

    Anyway, you're in one of the best countries to visit, make the most of it.
    Posted in: [LOR-SHM] Lorwyn, Morningtide, Shadowmoor, Eventide
  • posted a message on Is it possible to make A Mono-Green Villian?
    It does seem really hard for the color of nature, abundant life, and prosperity to harbor a villain. I can't think of a good personality for a green villain at all.
    Posted in: Magic Storyline
  • posted a message on To hell with poverty!
    Macgyver, are you at all interested in addressing the argument, or are you going to try and score ridiculous rhetorical points?

    "I'm not gold" indeed. If you're not going to at least make the pretense of intellectual honesty, I'm really not sure why anyone should waste any of their time further trying to explain to you why the gold standard is a terrible idea.


    I'm going to score ridiculous rhetorical points WHILE addressing the argument.

    It's really easy to go "TO HELL WITH YOU MACGYVER! YOU'RE DISHONEST Q.E.D. NO NEED TO WASTE ANY TIME EXPLAINING WHY!" but it doesn't prove anything.

    If you are saying I'm dishonest, you could at least point out where. (P.S. I'm not interested in the pretense of intellectual honesty, I'm here for the real thing.)
    Posted in: Debate
  • posted a message on Breaking the C[ARD]s You Wouldn't Touch (And We Still Win)
    Here's my pre-ban Shahrazad deck, which is the only deck I have left after my collection was stolen by an ogre. However, I am currently constructing a Helix Pinnacle deck for Lorwyn block and several Elder Dragon Highlander decks.

    Posted in: Retired Clan Threads
  • posted a message on Opening up a Shop/Business
    Quote from Rembr
    My friend, who used to work at a store, said majority of the store's revenue came from their aggressive buying/selling cards online, ebay et al


    The owner of a shop I went to up until Ravnica told me the exact same thing.

    In my opinion, it's really not a good time to open up a game store in the United States. Our dollar is so weak, and the economy is so poor, that a lot of people don't have the kind of money for games as they used to.

    But, if you think you have a strong enough business plan, go for it!
    Posted in: Magic General
  • posted a message on To hell with poverty!
    Gold doesn't speak for itself.


    Then what does it say? "I'm not gold!"?

    Gold is worth nothing more than what a moderately rare metal used for certain circuitry is worth by itself.


    So, you mean, gold is worth nothing more than what gold is, which is a moderately rare metal used for certain circuitry? Yes, I agree completely.

    It's only speculation that gives gold it's meaning.


    No, it's existence as a certain kind of matter (Au) gives it it's basic, objective value. Speculation gives it it's market value.

    It's practical value is only a fraction of it's speculative value


    Doesn't matter. Then someone is speculating wrong.

    You might as well argue that cash can be used to start fires, or to replace wallpaper.


    It can.
    Posted in: Debate
  • posted a message on Can someone provide a list of all non Basic Lands?
    Heh, I want to collect a playset of all the nonbasics. Then I'll build a land deck!
    Posted in: Magic General
  • posted a message on To hell with poverty!
    Quote from Horseshoe_Hermit
    So we already have that "objectively valuable" is a nonsense utterance.


    Quote from Horseshoe_Hermit
    Basically I'm turning this argument on the gold itself. Apparently everything works because there is trust that other people will trade for the gold you could obtain for your Dollar. That sounds like it's made of nothing, too.


    Quote from SSJ Alakazam
    No, nothing is objectively valuable, if by that you mean is equally valued by everyone.

    Without demand for gold, it's small supply would not make it valuable.


    It's not nonsense. Gold will always be worth it's weight in gold. It doesn't need any external guarantee. Certificate money requires someone to promise someone something. Fiat money requires someone to force someone to accept something as money. Gold speaks for itself.

    What I mean by objective value is that it is equally valuable whether anyone thinks it is or not. All matter has that kind of value. Because we can use it for something, it also has a practical value (speculative value, or market value also makes sense) which is affected by what we think something is worth. And to argue on the behalf of gold being worth something: it is really shiny and cool looking, and can be made into badass electronics (which we're all using right now).

    Is anyone really trying to argue that gold doesn't have value? Then what does?
    Posted in: Debate
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.