- noshadowkick
- Registered User
-
Member for 14 years, 1 month, and 8 days
Last active Sat, Nov, 7 2020 20:06:47
- 1 Follower
- 2,314 Total Posts
- 539 Thanks
-
3
Fredo posted a message on [SCD] Squee, Goblin NabobWe tried to cut original Masticore recently, but it wouldn't let us. True story.Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion -
1
Monkey D Luffy posted a message on [SCD] Squee, Goblin NabobI'll probably play 1 more masticore at 450. At 360, though, molten tail is the only one worth running. And well, it's close to staple, if not a staple.Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion -
2
dschumm posted a message on [[SCD]] OphiomancerPosted in: Cube Card and Archetype DiscussionQuote from KonfusiusYou are right.
What I want to do now that I know it triggers each upkeep is throw all those snakes at my opponent with Goblin Bombardment or Blasting Station. Yay, fun times!
I've actually thought long and hard about Mortarpod. More expensive to use but tapping is for wussies.
And for everyone thinking of adding in more ways to kill their own creatures. Please add Abyssal Persecutor he misses you. -
1
hardb0dy posted a message on [[SCD]] Unexpectedly AbsentThis has a fun interaction with Ashiok!Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion -
1
BetweenWalls posted a message on Getting tired of Magic, how about you?Magic's high prices prevented me from ever seriously considering the traditional 60-card competitive formats. (Vintage, Legacy, Modern, Standard) The only format that I can really compete fairly in is Pauper, but I've found singleton formats to have a much more interesting dynamic. Gaming isn't nearly as stale, (seeing the same cards over and over) and deckbuilding is also more interesting. Commander is the only majorly popular singleton-constructed format, so I of course play that. Otherwise, I've had a lot of fun with custom-made limited environments and big-stack variants such as Cube and Danger Room. I'm not tired of raising prices. I ignore them and play formats that don't need (or want) the expensive stuff. High quality proxies allow me to use the occasional card that's outside my budget, too.Posted in: Opinions & Polls
Your poll doesn't have a choice that fits this, so I thought I'd share. -
1
Trancebam posted a message on The other charmsIt's not going to be reanimate. I can see raise dead though. But reclaim? That's almost exactly the same thing.Posted in: Speculation -
1
bLatch posted a message on Should cities be allowed to ban businessesPosted in: DebateQuote from Cyan
However, it is worth noting that city governments have been 'deciding' which businesses should be in their respective cities for quite awhile. So even if the mayor of Boston does decide not to allow a Chick Fil A to build there, it won't be anything unprecedented.
This isn't quite accurate. City governments have been deciding what types of business should be in their respective cities for quite a while. Not what specific businesses.
Trust me, there is absolutely no way a city government could bad chic-fill-a and not other fast food restaurants and have it pass legal muster. Especially if they state explicitly that its because of the political views and actions of chic-fill-a
Quote from Cyan
I reject the idea that their marriage undermines mine; I actually feel the opposite. The notion that reality TV marriages hold more validity than marriage between two genuinely loving individuals bothers me. I want to be taking part in a social bond extended to all loving couples, not one artificially limited to my benefit.
Marriage also carries a specific definition and "romantic coupling between two consenting individuals" isn't, and hasn't ever been, that definition. The point being that its great, and I appreciate that you want to participate in a social bond that extended to all loving couples... but thats not what "marriage" is. I'm saying such unions shouldn't be recognized -- or even that they shouldn't have the exact same legal benefits. I'm saying the union between two men isn't a "marriage" anymore than a bus is a car. They share many similarities both in function and form, and if we want to confer benefits to both we should use a term that covers both. If only there was some term that could confer civil benefits on a union between any two people.
Yes, I think the "benefits" legally conferred by marriage should be changed to being provided to any civil unions. Then, the government should stop recognizing a difference except where its legally necessary (biological parent issues is about all I can come up with where it would be necessary). -
1
wtwlf123 posted a message on This or That discussion.I like the Lich more myself. It seems much more fun and interesting.Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
1
2
1
4
1
1
This land is definitely no Treetop Village, but could be a decent blocker in control decks. Is the poor activation rate worth being able to play this in any deck?
1
1
I personally don't think I'll mess with this guy, but if I did I'd make his -2 as expansive as possible to spice things up.
1
2
SO GLAD TO GET A NON 4 DROP!