2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on [M19][CUBE] Exclusion Mage
    Quote from Metamind »
    IDK if I want two Man-O-War as Aether Adept wasn't good enough. Perhaps over Blink of an Eye?


    The cost is the real difference, Aerther Adept would've been much easier to play at 2U
    Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion
  • posted a message on [M19][CUBE] Exclusion Mage
    I don't think it's better as bouncing your own creatures is a real application (maybe not the main, but it has been done plenty) and playing it out onto a dead board seems just as if not more niche, but it's definitely awesome and I'm definitely excited to run it.
    Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion
  • posted a message on [M19][CUBE] Patient Rebuilding
    Quote from bmholle »
    Quote from Salmo »
    ... fueling my opponent's GY shenanigans.


    This was one of my first thoughts but I think the "always loot" maxim applies and the effect is neutral. There is an equal chance that you mill stuff they don't want in their graveyard (their reanimation effects, etc.) as there is that you mill stuff they do want (fatties).


    Depends on the percentages, as looting is a bit different since I get the choice of what I keep. If there are 2 reanimation spells left and 3+ reanimation targets/things that care about the GY, the math on that never works out in favor of hurting my opponent. At best you have the neutral 'always loot' aspect against decks where they can't use the GY, but that's a poor ceiling.
    Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion
  • posted a message on [[Peasant]] The Peasant Cube Discussion Thread (C/U/)
    Quote from Leelue »
    I can't count how many times a card has vastly under or overperformed over the years. Especially weird ones, like vehicles or good auras.

    So, theory only gets you so far.


    Definitely. It's close to impossible to get a real sample size that could be considered accurate with a card while playing in person or just playing regularly in general.
    Posted in: Pauper & Peasant Discussion
  • posted a message on Planeswalker density, is it a problem or not?
    I have 31 in a 540. As much as I think 'slippery slope' is a real concept, PWer density is not one I apply it to especially since I could see myself cutting a number of them in the future and not necessarily for more PWers.
    Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion
  • posted a message on Planeswalker density, is it a problem or not?
    Quote from steve_man »
    I’m pretty maxed out on planeswalkers / 2-cmc mana rocks and my meta is still very healthy and aggro is still one of the most consistently winning archetypes. If your cube has aggressive strategies from Goblin Guide to Oath of Druids, planeswalker saturation shouldn’t be a problem.


    It helps in your cube to have the higher powered stuff which is frankly fine but also puts pressure on the durdle do-nothing PWer superfriends decks that can show up. There are some unpowered lists where it might be oppressive--see some MODO lists where highpowered spells are removed but there are a million PWerss--but when I can channel or tinker or aggro etc it then the slower aspects of planeswalkers don't grind everything else/dominate the format.
    Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion
  • posted a message on Random Cube Card of the Day Thread
    Hitting lands is overall a pretty niche application--you want to hit creatures since green has no real creature removal, and then the rest of the options. I don't run it anymore as is played out like a bad expensive path to exile that you could counter. The other day for example my opponent song'd my opposition, and then I flickerwhisp'd the opposition back, and just one of the multiple common ways Song can be nullified. Unlike O-Ring, I can't pay for my Flickerwhisp with O-Ring.

    Too much great music! This is my Spotify ever-growing playlist of all songs I've enjoyed from the past or new ones I've found through their discover feature:

    https://open.spotify.com/user/salmoilla/playlist/3QSfz207EYTHW8xyVoxZUA?si=GseT76I7SwqFtazNfZS9RQ
    Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion
  • posted a message on [M19] [Cube] Demon of Catastrophes
    In some decks with Bitterblossom or Ophiomancer, this could be sick.

    In other decks with without this, this could be *****.

    As much as I'm 'meh' on Kalitas, at least he's a stats monster I don't have to pay extra costs for.
    Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion
  • posted a message on [M19][CUBE] Patient Rebuilding
    Quote from majikian »
    Quote from akroma44 »
    I wonder how much a mono blue enchantment that just drew a card on your upkeep would cost.


    Honden of Seeing Winds


    Honden is like this card except more consistent at the cost of flashyness, and I'm not going to maybe win a game off the milling at the cost of fueling my opponent's GY shenanigans.
    Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion
  • posted a message on Planeswalker density, is it a problem or not?
    TBH it hasn't felt like a problem yet, so I haven't really thought about it. It helps that I like planeswalkers unlike some cube owners, so I'm not really looking for a reason to reduce them. I like the amount I have, and I would be open to expanding though not by extreme amounts.
    Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion
  • posted a message on [M19][CUBE] Patient Rebuilding
    How many 5 mana blue win conditions do we need? Probably one of the tightest spots in cube, it takes serious business to crack into that spot. Mystic Confluence, Bribery, Treachery, Meloku the Clouded Mirror, honorary always-splash-this card Fractured Identity, depending on if you have un-cards there's another set with Arcane Savant and our blue god Clocknapper. Even Tidings, not played by a lot of people, is probably overall better since you get the cards and move on with your life. It would be tough to justify a spot for a card that's really only good in one match up where those other cards are still pretty good there too. The power level on this feels kinda low compared to these options, with 5 mana cards I need to be incentivized to pick & play them and it's tough to find a good reason here.
    Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion
  • posted a message on [BBD][CUBE] Inclusions and Testing Results
    He's really good.
    Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion
  • posted a message on Random Cube Card of the Day Thread
    I still run it, but it's my next cut. After playing a bunch of decks where it should be good, it ended up being just worst than other filtering and draw effects. I would re-add it if I ever went to 720, but I don't see myself making that decision.

    My Spellbook (things I've been playing a lot lately/forever):

    Purphoros
    Monastery Mentor
    Recurring Nightmare
    Fractured Identity
    Fiery Confluence
    Dark Confidant
    Dack Fayden
    Strip Mine
    Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion
  • posted a message on [BBD][CUBE] Inclusions and Testing Results
    I think Will is great without Rowan.
    Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion
  • posted a message on [M19][CUBE] Patient Rebuilding
    Quote from majikian »
    I feel like it'll compare poorly to e.g. Tidings outside of grindy control mirrors.


    Yeah I think drawing 4 once for the same cost is prob better, especially since milling my opponent is only as bad as their deck lets it be. Considering I haven't seen a tidings in a 540 or less in years, I imagine this has tough competition even at bigger builds.

    Also, is that an 18% chance of drawing 0 cards?
    Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.