2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on Does this mean Tezzeret, AOB is dead?
    Tezz's price has sharply dropped in price, probably because none of the new spoilers have any synergies with Tezz. There are few good artifacts in this set, essentially killing off any hope of breaking Tezz.

    Does this mean Tezz is dead? No more Tezz decks post-rotation?
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on [ISD] Even More Spoilers: Feral Ridgewolf, Geistflame, and more
    Quote from triqui
    Past of Flame is awesome good. In Philly Pro-tour, there were at the very least 4 decks in the top 16 (including Jon Finkel cheap awesome deck), and 5 in top 32 that would use it without a doubt. Talking about "playable cards"

    Saying it's not good becouse it's not Yawgmoth's Will is like if WotC print a "Grey Lotus" that cost 1 and gives 2 of any color and people complaint becouse Black Lotus is better.


    There's a difference between "not sure if this is playable in any format" and "this belongs in every vintage deck," ie the difference between Flame and Yawg.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [ISD] Past in Flames
    Quote from Zephynoir
    Everyone that cried/was upset about Snapcaster not being Red - HA!

    I love this card so hard~


    No dude, this card still sucks in comparison to Snapcaster. Again, this won't be used in Vintage or Legacy at all.
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on [ISD] Even More Spoilers: Feral Ridgewolf, Geistflame, and more
    yawg's will is broken. this is not.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [ISD] Even More Spoilers: Feral Ridgewolf, Geistflame, and more
    LOL@everyone comparing it to Yawg will.

    Past in Flames is not playable in its current state. We're talking dollar-bin mythic here. Yawg's will is amazing because it lets you cast 0cmc and alternative casting costs from your graveyard, including things like LED, Black Lotus, and Force of Will. Flames costs 1 more, only includes sorceries and instants, and doesn't let you pay alternative costs.

    I'd say this on the same level as Recoup.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [ISD] No Deep Analysis! Boo..
    With the latest revealed cards, we know that there's no more Deep Analysis. Sad, but true. That spot has been filled by Delver of Secrets.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on Snapcaster Mage Shenanigans
    I think what he means is that you can't flash Snapcaster Mage into play against an aggro deck and then ponder during your opponent's turn. So, you either play Snapcaster like a sorcery and then cast ponder, or surprise your opponent with snapcaster and get the ETB bonus on an instant.
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on [ISD] Deep Analysis
    How likely do you guys think it is that we have a Deep Analysis in this set?

    There is exactly one card between Curse of the Bloody Tome and Deranged Assistant, and Deep Analysis fits!

    Hmm...
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on Molten-Tail Masticore.. Better when INN is out?!
    All we really need is a reprint of Deep Analysis.
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on Planar Chaos timeshifted borders.
    They're probably not coming back.

    If you look, they take up more ink than the recent cards. That was the whole reason they changed to the "new" borders in the first place--to save ink/money.
    Posted in: Magic General
  • posted a message on Is anyone sick of all the love blue is getting?
    Quote from JCricket
    It wouldn't even have been anything particularly new. Red occasionally gets similar cards, like Recoup and Surreal Memoir.


    Yes, but the problem with that is that Snapmage is much, much, much better than both of those cards. Combined.

    Snapcaster:
    1) Is a 2/1 at instant speed in addition to its ETB ability.
    2) Instant speed, as opposed to recoup/surreal's sorcery speed.
    3) Can target both instants and sorceries.

    If Recoup was instant speed and could target instants/sorceries, they'd be about the same, since snapcaster is a 2/1 and Recoup has flashback. But the way Recoup and Surreal are right now, nobody is going to play them in any decks. Especially when you have the option of running Snapcaster.
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on Red mana accel
    Into the Furnace - R
    Instant
    As an additional cost to cast Into the Furnace, sacrifice a permanent.
    Add RRR to your mana pool.

    Waste makes haste.
    Posted in: Custom Card Creation
  • posted a message on Is anyone sick of all the love blue is getting?
    Quote from BLu
    I don't see how any of the above cards except for Snapcaster do anything useful in eternal formats which is what you claimed to be complaining about.


    Sorry if you wanted me to keep my area of complaint narrow. Let me rephrase my post:

    All these great mechanics, and all going to blue. Snapcaster

    Really? What does red have so far? Into the Maw of Hell? lol.
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on Is anyone sick of all the love blue is getting?
    All these great mechanics, and all going to blue. Snapcaster, Cackling Counterpart, Laboratory Maniac, Skaab Ruinator, etc..

    Really? What does red have so far? Into the Maw of Hell? lol.
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on Laboratory Maniac, Obstinate Familiar & Removal
    If I have Laboratory Maniac and Obstinate Familiar out with no cards in my library, does the opponent have to kill both or just one card to win?

    I guess what I'm confused about is, when does it trigger? And does it trigger multiple times?

    If I would draw a card, I can win the game or not draw, right? So, if I choose to draw, can my opponent use removal on Lab Maniac and have me lose, or can I then choose not to draw the card because of Obstinate Familiar? This is all a little confusing @_@
    Posted in: Rumored Card Rulings
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.