To be fair, though, vintage bomberman decks these days don't even bother with pyrite spellbomb. They just draw their entire deck, play a bunch of creatures and then time walk and swing.
Here is the latest and greatest to come out of the rumor mill. Both the written written idea on the first page and the blurry photo at the end fail to pass muster.
I thought the blurry photo was intended as a joke; especially because you can sense the sarcasm in what the last poster was saying.
The fact that people always get so defensive about this fact, just goes to show how deep in denial they are.
If people call me out for playing magic, then I needn't associate myself with those people any more. If they could be that shallow, then I'm usually the one taking pity on them.
Unless the person is someone in a high place, like a potential employer. In that case, they would NEVER find out (much like the rest of my personal life, actually).
I honestly do not see a reason for the deck to be constructed as it was. Bubble Matrix > Pariah > Malignus = half-assed bumrushing elemental deck.
logic doesn't compute.
I don't understand... This is Group Make a Deck. Not everyone has to be a sheep and follow the first person to open their mouth. People are entitled to their suggestions and are also given the power of a vote. There's no need to say to us after the deck is done, "oh I woulda done it this way..." because you had the power all along to suggest whatever and vote out the cards that you didn't like.
Some people actually appreciated the suggestion of elementals. From then on, people agreed that was how we were going to build the deck. Nobody else decided they would speak up.
This suggestion may be voted out fast but I'm just going to throw it out there
I basically said I wouldn't be upset if enough people thought my card was out of place. But you know what? Nobody did (Muzzy had a question about trample working, and that was it...)
Lastly, remember, you're in the casual forum. Why do you have to care that some random decklist that you're never going to buy, is "wrong"? Regardless, if I ever want to play this list, I'm not going to blindly netdeck it... I'm going to tweak it to suit.
Voting out:
Sunflare Shaman: Why did it have to be a pinger that randomly sacrificed itself? Also, I don't see THAT many elementals in our graveyard. (gone)
Elemental Mastery: Counter-intuitive to what we're trying to accomplish. The creatures that were chosen get around bubble matrix already. This feels a little too cute for me. (gone)
No, trample works You only have to assign an amount of damage that would be lethal and then assign the rest to the defending player. It doesn't matter if it gets prevented. When you are assigning the damage, all you care about is the toughness of the blocker.
Auriok Salvagers + Black Lotus + Pyrite Spellbomb
To be fair, though, vintage bomberman decks these days don't even bother with pyrite spellbomb. They just draw their entire deck, play a bunch of creatures and then time walk and swing.
He only said that to point out why using the term "fight" was incorrect in this situation. He wasn't trying to say that was the answer.
It's a hypothetical land that taps for colourless, but counts as a basic land (To make the domain mechanic better)
Here you go, an article all about it
http://www.wizards.com/magic/magazine/article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/mm/25
I thought the blurry photo was intended as a joke; especially because you can sense the sarcasm in what the last poster was saying.
If people call me out for playing magic, then I needn't associate myself with those people any more. If they could be that shallow, then I'm usually the one taking pity on them.
Unless the person is someone in a high place, like a potential employer. In that case, they would NEVER find out (much like the rest of my personal life, actually).
Whoa cannot be unseen!!!
I have a feeling that should such a card be printed, it would need to be a green (simic) card to fit thematically.
Instead of getting rid of Mother of Runes, I can vote off Nemsis mask, Fountain watch and Pariah and we can be done with this?
I don't understand... This is Group Make a Deck. Not everyone has to be a sheep and follow the first person to open their mouth. People are entitled to their suggestions and are also given the power of a vote. There's no need to say to us after the deck is done, "oh I woulda done it this way..." because you had the power all along to suggest whatever and vote out the cards that you didn't like.
Here, look:
Some people actually appreciated the suggestion of elementals. From then on, people agreed that was how we were going to build the deck. Nobody else decided they would speak up.
Also:
I basically said I wouldn't be upset if enough people thought my card was out of place. But you know what? Nobody did (Muzzy had a question about trample working, and that was it...)
Lastly, remember, you're in the casual forum. Why do you have to care that some random decklist that you're never going to buy, is "wrong"? Regardless, if I ever want to play this list, I'm not going to blindly netdeck it... I'm going to tweak it to suit.
Sunflare Shaman: Why did it have to be a pinger that randomly sacrificed itself? Also, I don't see THAT many elementals in our graveyard. (gone)
Elemental Mastery: Counter-intuitive to what we're trying to accomplish. The creatures that were chosen get around bubble matrix already. This feels a little too cute for me. (gone)
4 Bubble Matrix
2 Boros Signet
3 Nemesis Mask (-1)
Creatures: 25
4 Flamekin Harbinger
4 Wall of Glare
3 Mirror Entity (1 @-1)
3 Fountain Watch (-1)
2 Glory
3 Nova Chaser (1 @-1)
2 Malignus
4 Mother of Runes
3 Pariah (-1)
2 Oblivion Ring
Spells: 4
3 Faithless Looting
1 sudden disappearance (-1)
Land: 23
13 Placeholder
3 boros garrison
4 Clifftop Retreat
3 Sunhome, Fortress of the Legion
It's okay, like I said, I realised it might be gone very shortly after I added it. If you think it doesn't fit, go ahead and vote for it
Also, I don't quite get Mark of Asylum. It prevents the stuff like lightning bolt and not much else?