2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on New Kiora Planeswalker
    I hope her ultimate is something like: Draw a card for each island you control. You get an emblem which doubles mana from lands.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on Announcing Duel Decks: Zendikar vs Eldrazi
    I suspect that the Eldrazi that gives all of your Eldrazi spawn +2/+1 is a likely rare reprint for this.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Ghostfire Blade
    Quote from sirgog »
    Quote from jace19 »
    am i missing something? Bonesplitter is a bad card. I love equipment, i use plenty of it in lots of builds, it sucks. if your target is morphed (aka, useless), an artifact creature (probably big already) or Eldrazi (so anything else is win-more)this is BETTER, not good, even if the next set is full of goodies for it, which i would love, it is still too small. i want to be wrong and i easily could be, but i'm pretty sure about this one


    Bonesplitter was a widely-played card in Mirrodin-era Standard, a format where Bonesplitter was more likely to be killed by artifact destruction spells than the present day Standard. In Mirrodin standard, it was one of four widely played equipment (Splitter, Empyrial Plate, Loxodon Warhammer, and the now-forgotten 'draw 2 discard 1' equipment), and still saw some play even after Darksteel sent Standard's power level into the stratosphere.

    I don't see this getting played in today's Standard. I do, however, see it being widely played after Fate Reforged, as it looks like a clear forward-synergy plant for a set with a lot of colourless cards (Ugin is colourless-aligned in the lore).


    I've seen at least one deck that plays it in standard (mono blue robots)
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [New Info] Duel Decks: Speed vs. Cunning
    Quote from DemonDragonJ »
    Is there any chance of tainted peak being reprinted in this set? It is the only "tainted" land that has not yet been reprinted in the modern card frame, and each other land of that cycle was reprinted in a Duel Deck or other supplementary product, so I believe that it would be very nice, indeed.


    Probably not, because tainted peak needs a deck with swamps dominating it to make a good home (which is why it couldn't go in Tibalts deck, which was mainly red). The Speed deck will be WBR, with red as the dominant colour (and in any case there wouldn't be enough swamps in a three colour deck to justify it). Sadly it will probably have to wait until next years duel deck, or a supplementary product.

    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [[M15]] Mothership 7/3/14: Doom and Trees
    Quote from DTG »
    Quote from Hiss »
    That Treefolk is surprisingly efficient. 12 Power spread out over two bodies for a mere cost of 6 mana? There is no "Cast from your hand" clause either, making the card all the more worthwhile.


    It's worse than Armada Wurm's 10 power spread out over two trampling bodies and that never saw play. Sweet card but the format would have to be super slow for it to see play IMO.


    I thought that Armada Wurm DID see play, especially in early RTR block standard before dragons maze and gatecrash.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [[M15]] Sliver Hive
    Why do you think its just a 1/1 for 5? Its only that if you control a sliver, and if you control a sliver its much better than a 1/1, unless your sliver is a metallic sliver.
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on [[M15]] Aggressive Mining
    Quote from chipanddale45 »
    Don't really like it, If it was a Fireblast variant it would be better sacrifice a land, deal 4 damage.


    This looks like a top down design, for mining, and mining gets you resources, not damage.
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on [[CNS]] What does a 35 card draft deck look like?
    If they print something like elixir of immortality in CNS, and you pick one up, there is that problem gone. But you'd probably try and win before you deck yourself.
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on [[CNS]] Announcing - MTG: GVYJTHQXGR (Conspiracy)
    Quote from Northjayhawk
    Quote from Lowynd
    Quote from AvatarofBro
    Maybe:
    +1 Faithless Looting
    -2 Act of Treason
    -6 Reverberate Emblem


    It is clear that his -2 ability has only one text line, so there is certanly no room for "until end of turn. Untap it and it gains haste until end of turn." clause. So, -2 ablility is to steal something forever. The best guess is that it's an artifact.


    Wouldn't "gain control of target permanent" be pushed and too strong for standard?


    Isn't Conspiracy not standard legal?
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Huey/Dewey/Louie confirmed new Plane
    Quote from signofzeta
    How was Dragon's Maze drafted again?

    Maybe, just maybe, this new block structure will be similar to Return to Ravnica's Large Large Small structure, but when you draft the third set, that is, a small set, there won't be a booster pack from the first set.

    Remember Zendikar and Innistrad blocks, with the third large set being drafted alone, and the first and second sets drafted together? Maybe this time, the first set is drafted alone, and the second and third sets are drafted together.


    Dragons maze was DGM-GTC-RTR. Because GTC and RTR were both large sets, and DGM had support for all 10 guilds, it made more sense than DGM-GTC-GTC or DGM-RTR-RTR, since that would leave half the guilds in DGM with no support outside of DGM.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Duel Decks: Divine vs Demonic Series 2
    Re-assembling skeleton is nice for something to sacrifice, (although the only sacrifice outlets are Victimize and Painwracker Oni), but there are only 5 creatures in the angel deck that it can block (the 5 Kor). Maybe something like Grimclaw Bats or Stinkweed Imp?

    It does seem a little weird that the angels deck has more ressurection than the demon deck does. Maybe some graveyard hate for the demons (Withered Wretch?)
    Posted in: Custom Set Creation and Discussion
  • posted a message on [TIB]-Tibalt's Saga [23/237]
    I think the : is just an artefact of the new forum. It happens when you put anything that isn't either t, wubrg, X, hybrid or 1-9 within [mana] tags (I may have missed some).

    You could swap Amrits +1 to be gain life for each opponents creature, the -2 to be a fog effect, and make the ultimate either "All/opponents creatures lose all abilities" or "Creatures cannot attack or block unless controller pays 1 mana". Most planeswalker ultimates are meant to be very powerful, but even nuking all creature abilities will give you a huge advantage.
    Posted in: Custom Set Creation and Discussion
  • posted a message on [[BNG]] Event Desk list Underworld Herald
    Can't wait for some aspiring upstart to buy this, enter an FNM and go 0-X, then file a million-dollar lawsuit against Wizards.

    After all, people could already file a lawsuit against McDonald's over napkins; I don't see why the same couldn't be done here. Be careful of the word usage when promoting your stuff, Wizards.


    Do they say anywhere that this deck is 'sure to win'? I thought all they say is something along the lines of 'ready to play', which more or less means you have a curve, appropriate amount of lands and some sort of deck strategy.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [[BaseSpec]] I think BNG and Theros are Probably the WORST Sets in History
    Literally no thought went into the thing.


    You might want to rethink the word literally.
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on Next Duel Decks Theme?
    Khan vs the crew of the U.S.S Enterprise!
    Posted in: Speculation
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.