2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on Was this Play Legal?
    Actually, legality of the play depends on the order the Fiend Hunter triggers were stacked. The way Thought Criminal stacked them, it works, the other way, player B would have 2 choices:
    1. Emrakul stays exiled
    2. Emrakul never leaves the battlefield
    In neither case is Emrakul re-entering the battlefield

    Here's why:

    Stack after Fiend Hunter returns:
    TOP
    LTB trigger (Return Steel Helkite
    ETB trigger (May Exile Emrakul)
    BOTTOM

    LTB trigger resolves:
    TOP
    ETB trigger for Hellkite from the plane (targeting Fiend Hunter)
    ETB trigger (May Exile Emrakul)
    BOTTOM

    Fiend Hunter dies, and we have
    TOP
    LTB trigger (Return Emrakul)
    ETB trigger (May Exile Emrakul)
    BOTTOM

    So either Emrakul gets exiled forever, or it never gets exiled at all.
    Posted in: Magic Rulings Archives
  • posted a message on [[GTC]] DailyMTG Previews 1/14: Ooze Flux & Blind Obedience
    What no one seems to have realized is that the Ooze Flux doesn't just interact with evolve, it also interacts with UNDYING!!! If you have a Geralf's Messenger with a +1/+1 counter that's about to die, just remove the counter for 1G and it comes back.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Populate and triggers?
    Both the creation of the 3/3 and populate happen during the spell's resolution. So there is no chance to respond between them.

    This is similar to any other spell that does several things, like Ponder. There is no chance for any player to cast spells between the different things the spell does.

    As a side note, there are no triggers involved in the situation you describe.
    Posted in: Magic Rulings Archives
  • posted a message on [DKA] DailyMTG Previews 1/12: Havengul Lich; Thalia, Guardian of Thraben
    Lich seems like it could be broken by someone (I'm not saying that it will) possibly some kind of self-mill deck?
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [DKA] DailyMTG Previews 1/9: Loads of cards!
    Some more cards (from Visual Spoiler)
    Posted in: Rumor Mill Archive
  • posted a message on Box Mapping -- Innistrad Edition [ISD]
    Here's my most recent box:

    Left Column


    Witchbane Orb/Garruk Relentless
    Gavony Township/Village Ironsmith
    Curse of the Stalked Prey/Screeching Bat
    Endless Ranks of the Dead/Villagers of Estwald
    Rooftop Storm/Ulvenwald Mystics
    Woodland Cemetery/Thraben Sentry
    Heretic's Punishment/Delver of Secrets
    Moorland Haunt/Gatsaf Shepherd
    Skirsdag High Priest/Instigator Gang
    Undead Alchemist/Village Ironsmith
    Tree of Redemption/Daybreak Ranger
    Runechanter's Pike/Tormented Pariah

    Middle Column

    Reaper from the Abyss/Grizzled Outcasts
    Dearly Departed/Mayor of Avabruck
    Bloodgift Demon/Delver of Secrets
    Creeping Renaissance/Hanweir Watchkeep/Foil Sulfur Falls
    Cackling Counterpart/Tormented Pariah
    Back from the Brink/Delver of Secrets
    Past in Flames/Hanweir Watchkeep
    Blasphemous Act/Villagers of Estwald
    Unbreathing Horde/Grizzled Outcasts
    Olivia Voldaren/Reckless Waif
    Dearly Departed/Villagers of Estwald
    Laboratory Maniac/Grizzled Outcasts

    Right Column


    Parallel Lives/Reckless Waif
    Heretic's Punishment/Tormented Pariah
    Mikaeus, the Lunarch/Gatsaf Shepherd
    Elder of Laurels/Thraben Sentry
    Creepy Doll/Village Ironsmith
    Sulfur Falls/Civilized Scholar
    Snapcaster Mage/Foil Village Ironsmith
    Mentor of the Meek/Cloistered Youth
    Elite Inquisitor/Foil Bloodline Keeper
    Clifftop Retreat/Tormented Pariah
    Charmbreaker Devils/Thraben Sentry
    Geist-Honored Monk/Screeching Bat

    Mythics = Dark orange, Rare DFC = Blue
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on [ISD] StarCityGames.com Preview - Skaab Ruinator
    Quote from pandafarmer
    I don't even think he's good in Pod. Pod was testing Myr Superion for a while and dropped it because it was a dead draw and also was something that would stop pod chains dry. You'd much rather have a continuous chain of creatures that do things when the CIP or die.


    Myr Superion is dead draw since you will usually pitch your mana creatures to Pod. This is usually not a dead draw because your opponent will have killed some of your creatures and if you have pod out you will be putting more creatures into the graveyard, so exiling 3 from the 'yard is not a problem.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Have we lost all non-green mana fixing?
    Quote from RanDomino
    Check the spoiler again.


    Plague Spitter is right, there are 6 lands remaining: numbers 239 and 243-247.

    I suspect we'll get 1 special land (it might be something like Evolving Wilds, which actually fits in that slot) in 239 and a cycle (1 or 2 colored) in the 243-247 range, the cycle will most likely have the same first word (like Vivid lands did, which unfortunately do not fit there :().
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on Commander - Limited
    Looking at the list of public events for PT-Philadelphia, I saw the following two entries:

    Commander - Constructed $5 4 2 boosters per eliminated player
    Commander - Limited $30 4 2 boosters per eliminated player

    I assume that Commander-Constructed is just your garden variety commander, but what is Commander-Limited? Does anyone know or have ideas?
    Posted in: Commander (EDH)
  • posted a message on Training Ground - SOMEBODY BREAK THIS NOW
    Quote from onewheelwizzard
    So, does this mean that an activated Lavaclaw Reaches now reads:

    "1: +3/+0"

    ???

    Because that would be pretty silly. Stack multiple Training Grounds and Lavaclaw Reaches becomes absolutely terrifying. IF THIS WORKS, then with 4 Grounds down, Reaches activates for 1BR and then you pay 1 to make it an 11/2, 2 to make it a 20/2. Ridiculous.

    Am I missing something, or does this combo work?


    That works :evillol:.

    Now to make a scary grixis land deck
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on The Great M10 Rules Change Discussion Thread (Rules, Not Opinion)
    Quote from Seth Dracovitch
    So here's a question that I'm unsure on. Let's say I have a creature with a pump ability. Putrid Leech is a good example. I know that If my opponent has a Grizzly Bears and declares it as the blocker. I can pump the leech to a 4/4 before damage thus killing the bear and keeping my leech alive. But what about a "no blocker" scenario? Can my opponent declare "no blockers" during the "Declare Blockers" step and before damage is dealt pump my Leech to a 4/4? For instance

    Player {A} declares Ptrid leech as the attacker.
    Player {B} has no creatures and thus delcares no blockers.
    Player {A} pumps the leech to a 4/4 and hits the opponent for 4.

    Is that scenario right? Or is the Leech not able to be pumped since there are no blockers and thus only deals 2 damage?


    Yes, that i still valid, since you will still receive priority in the declare blockers step
    Posted in: Magic Rulings Archives
  • posted a message on Lim-Dul the Necromancer
    Quote from Marcel
    For the first question, no. Both creatures are being placed in the graveyard at the same time.


    You are correct in that they go to the graveyard at the same time, BUT the ability still triggers. (see the example for CR 410.10d for a similar situation). Clarification: yes you can take control of the bears.

    ~demon
    Posted in: Magic Rulings Archives
  • posted a message on [M10] Compilation of Known Info
    Two new M10 arts from today's article one is from a new card, one from a reprint.

    EDIT: Here's the original article.
    Posted in: Rumor Mill Archive
  • posted a message on Cascade + Split cards
    Quote from Apex
    Zomg, not another one of those Cascade questions :D.

    But seriously, if I Cascade into a Boom with, let's say with a Bloodbraid Elf, can I play the Bust part for free? I mean, I should be able to right? Since the cmc of Boom/Bust is 2 and 6, like, similar how you can imprint Research on Isochron Scepter and play Development off of it right?


    I believe that this does in fact work, but I may be wrong, we need to wait for the FAQ/Comp Rules update to answer this question definitively (since we still don't know the exact rule wording for cascade).
    Posted in: Rumored Card Rulings
  • posted a message on [ARB] Maelstrom Nexus
    Something no one has yet mentioned (as far as I've seen): this says every turn, that means even what you play on opponents' turns can get cascade from this. (Say hello to an instant Cruel Ultimatum off of Broken Ambitions) Smile
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.